- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 42,161
- Liked Posts:
- 51,305
Not expecting a SB.
Just thought we'd have more than a "meh roster" 7 years in.
And I thought you'd shut the fuck up a couple hundred posts ago..... and yet here we are. ?
Not expecting a SB.
Just thought we'd have more than a "meh roster" 7 years in.
Hardly. He's not that important imo.
Trading Hicks would also allows a Robinson extension.
He's a dick.Yeah but have you met Peter?
That was the 'pre-Mack' yearsSo if we had had more picks, but hit on a lesser percentage of them, that would be acceptable?
He's signed thru 2023 with a $7M cap hit this season.Is Goldman coming back? Whats his contract status.
Hicks isn't what holding up a Robinson extension. Extending Robinson would lower his cap hit a bunch for 2021.Hardly. He's not that important imo.
Trading Hicks would also allows a Robinson extension.
Ppl are entitled to have an opinion.And I thought you'd shut the fuck up a couple hundred posts ago..... and yet here we are. ?
I think there is an extra year with Covid opt outHe's signed thru 2023 with a $7M cap hit this season.
Ppl are entitled to have an opinion.
Put me on ignore, rather than hurl insults.
This. Would give 18M back to the Bears (minus whatever guaranteed money/Salary to Arob)Hicks isn't what holding up a Robinson extension. Extending Robinson would lower his cap hit a bunch for 2021.
Offer a solution with $9m in cap space and limited draft picks?@halftime, you might be better received if you actually gave solutions or even ideas for improvement instead of constantly complaining. It takes you from being objective and intuitive, to just sounding like a whining bitch. Hence the negative feedback from folks.
That said, does anyone have an idea which FA’s currently out there would make our team better than it would be with Hicks? I find it hard to believe a worse/less consistent pass rush can be shored up by any of the FA CB’s currently out there. The closest player that could “possibly” improve the team (on offense) that I’ve seen anyone say is Moses, and even that is suspect. He’s not replacing a guy we’re paying 4.25 mil to at RT, so at most he would be an expensive depth signing incase Jenkins goes down with an injury?
Perhaps I’m missing the point and everyone ok with not competing this year?
I personally would rather they at least go to the plate and take their swings as opposed to just forfeiting and taking the L.
Whatever.100% agree.
My opinion is your opinion's suck.
Well in the ditch Hicks scenario, it would be closer to $19mil would it not? lol What then do you think? Could we improve? Or is it just a signal to the rest of the players that the Org is giving up on them this year already and they haven’t even taken a snap? That’s not the way I would lead, but then again, I can understand that some people here have never lead and therefore they don’t always take everything into consideration.Offer a solution with $9m in cap space and limited draft picks?
Might not be a good one.
I doubt they get someone to take Hicks. I would just keep him for the season rather than get a 5th round pick.Well in the ditch Hicks scenario, it would be closer to $19mil would it not? lol What then do you think? Could we improve? Or is it just a signal to the rest of the players that the Org is giving up on them this year already and they haven’t even taken a snap? That’s not the way I would lead, but then again, I can understand that some people here have never lead and therefore they don’t always take everything into consideration.
Ppl are entitled to have an opinion.
Put me on ignore, rather than hurl insults.
Mind your own business, busy body.Nowhere there did he hurl an insult. Since you're so thin skinned why don't YOU put him on ignore.
If you have more picks and hit on the same level of picks you have more players on cheap rookie contracts.So if we had had more picks, but hit on a lesser percentage of them, that would be acceptable?