- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
They are desperste given they lost Rice, Hollywood, and Juju. Dont think Hopkins offers much but guess we will see.
- Joined:
- Jan 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 6,872
- Liked Posts:
- 4,282
- Location:
- Chicago
Have you looked at their OFF?
Levis/Rudolph—both bad
Pollard—okay; Spears—okay.
Ridley, Boyd, NWI—pretty bad
Chig—okay
Seems pretty bad to me
Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 15,343
- Liked Posts:
- 19,809
The rbs are fine (literally who gives a shit even if they aren't, rbs are produced from every round of the draft and udfa yearly).
Qb is obviously abysmal.
Ridley is a good 2. Boyd is a good slot and Westbrook would be the bears 4th wr.
Chig is fine, lots of teams are fine at TE.
The right side of the OL and qb are their biggest holes. Qb is hard for lots of teams to solve. Bears have spent the last 80 years trying to figure it out.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,830
- Liked Posts:
- 9,039
We see how it goes, but a lot of players somehow find the miracle pill when they go to contenders.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 42,133
- Liked Posts:
- 34,881
Read as:
"It’s happening: Titans and Chiefs are working to finalize a tragedy that would send WR DeAndre Hopkins to Kansas City, league sources tell ESPN."
Brane was like "Godamn Schefty is a drama queen"
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
@dbldrew notice snaps being used to refer to a WR.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 42,133
- Liked Posts:
- 34,881
But how many snaps TAKEN.
This whole trade will clearly be dictated on how many direct snaps the WR takes on trick plays.
SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 6,653
- Liked Posts:
- 6,468
I’m sure they could acquire other receivers especially considering Hopkins can’t even run anymore. Kinda weird, like why not just call anyone up from the practice squad?
I guess Brett veach and Andy Reid weren’t one of the anonymous GM’s claiming d hop literally can’t run.
TL1961
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2013
- Posts:
- 33,986
- Liked Posts:
- 18,542
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
Not sure your point. Other WRs likely cost more. DHop hasnt done anything for the Chiefs yet? So not sure why you prematurely celebrating. Let's revisit if he actually plays well for KC.
SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 6,653
- Liked Posts:
- 6,468
The simple fact that the best team in the nfl, with one of the best HC and GM, targetted this player continues to make a mockery of the redarded article you shared and defended stating d hop can’t even run anymore.
Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 15,343
- Liked Posts:
- 19,809
The fact he went over 1000 yards with bad qb play last year kind of drove home that was nonsense
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
No it really doesnt. He hasnt done shit for the Chiefs yet and every GM and coach makes mistakes. So this proves nothing about his ability to run. He has to actually play well for the Chiefs. This should be obvious.
Most likely he was brought in to be a contested catch guy like Allen is. Allen like Hopkins looks slow but both can still be useful because of their contested catch ability which is what was said.
Last edited:
dbldrew
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 5,750
- Liked Posts:
- 2,439
Notice it's lacking the word take
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
Funny how all the reports below lack the word take too.
Bears Trade QB Justin Fields to Steelers for Conditional Draft Pick
The Chicago Bears are finally making a trade for their starting quarterback, sending him to the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Could a conditional 4th-round pick be the reason for Fields' benching?
Could the possibility of the Steelers owing the Chicago Bears a fourth-round pick be responsible for Justin Fields benching?
steelerswire.usatoday.com
Grading the Justin Fields trade: The Bears misread the market, and the Steelers took advantage
The Bears traded the quarterback to the Steelers for a 2025 conditional draft pick. Is that really the best Chicago could do?
www.espn.com
Last edited:
dbldrew
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 5,750
- Liked Posts:
- 2,439
Remy I know you desperately want to catch me in some lie to attempt to even the score because you got caught a few times lying but this is not going to work.
Funny how all the reports below lack the word take too.
Bears Trade QB Justin Fields to Steelers for Conditional Draft Pick
The Chicago Bears are finally making a trade for their starting quarterback, sending him to the Pittsburgh Steelers.www.si.com
Could a conditional 4th-round pick be the reason for Fields' benching?
Could the possibility of the Steelers owing the Chicago Bears a fourth-round pick be responsible for Justin Fields benching?
Grading the Justin Fields trade: The Bears misread the market, and the Steelers took advantage
The Bears traded the quarterback to the Steelers for a 2025 conditional draft pick. Is that really the best Chicago could do?
I don't care about being wrong here, in fact I would rather be wrong. I hope I heard wrong or the score was wrong because that means that we can still get a 4th for RB1 playing his natural position as RB..
Me remembering wrong or mishearing is not even close to the same as you embarrassing yourself when you lied about playing football so this attempt to "even the score" won't work.
Have a good day Remy
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
So you finally admit you were wrong. Got it.
dbldrew
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 5,750
- Liked Posts:
- 2,439
You do like to ignore words that change the meaning of a sentence don't you? Like "take" or when I say "I hope"
Actually now that I think about it. There was the report that there was a higher offer that poles passed on. The score must of been talking about that offer when I heard them say he needed to "take" the snaps. That must be why poles passed on it right?
If you had an option of a 6th turning into say a 3rd but he needed to "take" the snaps (play QB) vs just be on the field to get a 4th with the Steelers deal. It makes perfect sense now why Poles went with the lower offer.
Poles knows that Fields was a shitty QB so there was no shot at getting anything if he needed to play QB. So he took the RB option that the Steelers offered.
Yeah that seems to make sense, that's probably what I heard on the score, they also where talking about how stupid Fields cult members are who lie about playing football as well in that segment.
Last edited:
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 45,614
- Liked Posts:
- 34,888
My favorite teams
I heard he's playing Sunday, which is amazing to me.
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,342
- Liked Posts:
- 38,989
