If Vikes offered Jefferson and #23 for #9, would you take it?

Would you take it?

  • No.. it helps them get a franchise QB

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • Yes.. in a heartbeat

    Votes: 29 78.4%
  • Yes but ask for better compensation

    Votes: 4 10.8%

  • Total voters
    37

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,411
Liked Posts:
7,606
Hypothetical and unlikely scenario. Some mocks have them giving their 11, 23 and Jefferson to Patriots for 3 and 68. So this is not as dumb as you think
No, this is as dumb as I and others think. It just shows that people will vomit out anything for clicks by creating dumb mocks.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,338
Liked Posts:
4,847
Why wouldn't they just offer pick number 11 and a second?

Fucking stupid.
 

hyatt151

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
13,100
Liked Posts:
3,979
That's just bad value for JJ. They'd never do that trade either.

Think of the Tyreke Hill trade as an example. And, I believe the Vikings need even more than KC got for Hill. And that said, both these trades value JJ as only a 2nd round pick. They need a return of value of around a top 15 pick at minimum in my opinion.

Also consider… two 1sts this year plus JJ is probably better return than we got last year from the Panthers for the first. Obviously, it worked out great for us cause we landed number 1 again, but in terms of trade value at that time, the future Panthers pick was probably more so calculated around a future 5-10 pick which is like current value of ~pick 40. So… No. 9 plus a future 1st is probably less than picks 11 and 23 in the current year. As I said, JJ should return top 15 value, where Moore was probably more like late 1st value… maybe less? Anyway, that difference in WRs about makes up the 2nd round picks in the Panthers trade. I know the above proposal returns a third, but the difference between the 1st pick and the 3rd is trade chart value of roughly two 2nd round picks which squashes that 3rd.

Either way, bottom line is neither trade would realistically happen. The 11 & 23 picks alone are almost equal to the 3rd pick. Throwing in JJ to return a 3rd is nuts.
quit pissing on the fanbois alternate reality
 

hyatt151

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
13,100
Liked Posts:
3,979
So the Vikes making the moves they did to get Houston's pick means they're trying to trade in the top 5, not the back end of the top 10.

Justin Jefferson wants 30+ mil a year, to be the highest-paid WR in the history of the NFL, and its time to pay him. Absolutely not, because big money WRs don't win superbowls. That, and he, DJ, and Keenan would be useless and a complete waste when the bottom 10 OL gets Caleb killed.

Fans will revolt when none of them are 1000 yard WRs, go full diva and complain about lack of opportunities, kill the clubhouse lockerroom, and Ryan Poles would get appropriately fired when the offense is hot garbage yet again, and the DL after Sweat sucks balls, kind of like the last GB game of last year when they took him out of the game and nobody could make a play.

But....I'd kind of like that, because then every last dipshit who's been screaming "WR separation" the past X amount of years as the problem won't have any more excuses, and then they'll have to acknowledge that you can't half-ass the OL. Or, they'll be just as dumb as before and will deserve never to see a winning team, because the game is won and lost in the trenches, not the secondary. If even a few of said dipshits can see that, then that's a win.

I'm sure your Madden dynasty franchise or your fantasy football team loves the move.
any injury to Johnson or Sweat and this defense will implode, same goes for the OL IF Any injury to the Tackles or Center
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
38,218
Liked Posts:
37,016
Hey, already this poll has more votes than the ones by @Anytime23
The number of times youve @‘d me today exceeds the number of times you’ve made a woman cum in your entire life.

Tell me, did you become *** the first time you were rejected by a woman like you turned into a Lions fan after CCS rejected your first post?

Oh sorry, did you become fake **** lololololololololol. Signed up to a lifetime network message board to act like he’s never been into woman. So cool!
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,338
Liked Posts:
4,847
The number of times youve @‘d me today exceeds the number of times you’ve made a woman cum in your entire life.

Tell me, did you become *** the first time you were rejected by a woman like you turned into a Lions fan after CCS rejected your first post?

Oh sorry, did you become fake **** lololololololololol. Signed up to a lifetime network message board to act like he’s never been into woman. So cool!
Sadlittleman23 and his 12 year old sex humor.

Yawn
 

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
38,218
Liked Posts:
37,016
You ain’t breaking anything. The dumbest are the ones on here that some poor schmuck wasted hours on preparing.
Yep! But it’s an A+ grade with all of the players they never watched!
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
48,964
Liked Posts:
27,540
It's time to stop making threads, Diaper. Each thread I've seen you make smells and feels like a full diaper.
Hypothetical and unlikely scenario. Some mocks have them giving their 11, 23 and Jefferson to Patriots for 3 and 68. So this is not as dumb as you think
 

EDPeezy

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 5, 2014
Posts:
2,220
Liked Posts:
1,133
What’s the point is discussing something that would never happen? If you trade for Jefferson you have to pay him. How are the Bears paying Justin Jefferson? They going to have 40% of their cap going to WR’s? We don’t really want the fist page flooded with a bunch of unrealistic pointless trade scenarios that could never happen.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,605
Liked Posts:
2,964
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
I don't even want a WR at 9 but if that was offered, all bets are off take Jefferson and put the rest of the draft on auto-select
 

Bearly

Guest
Some mocks have them giving their 11, 23 and Jefferson to Patriots for 3 and 68. So this is not as dumb as you think.
Yes it's crazy, it's like giving us an extra 1st.

By the chart, they'd be giving NE a 1860 point differential plus Jefferson for the #3 pick worth 2200 points . Jefferson -340 for #3.

The Bears pick is worth 1350 and the Vikes value would be 2110. Jefferson +760 for the #12? Never. That's 1100 more point value or the equivalent of pick #14 extra for the trade to the Bear. It's literally an extra 1st round more value.

It's not remotely the same.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top