didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,989
Or do you go with Mac Jones? Or maybe a non QB like Slater?
Yeah…in hindsight and present,Feels like the snake eating it's own tail or a chicken or egg type question.
I don't believe Justin is anything resembling a good QB, but there's always that what if just floating in the back of your head. Mainly because the Bears appear to be incompetent at developing QB's, and Fields in theory would be set up much better for success with a coach from an offensive background, not to mention the weapons the Vikings have(And I actually 'mostly' like what Flus has done although he was smoking crack last week with some of those decisions).
It honestly feels like whoever the Bears draft at QB is destined to be ass, so in hindsight I probably wouldn't trade any kind of picks for him.
Yeah…in hindsight and present,
It’s time our desperation for a Qb get layer to rest and we focus on winning a long term battle of strut ion (think years of protecting assets through team build and play style and draft and free agent strategy.)
Bellicek lost Brady and put these tactics into over-drive. He built a team and gave a QB a chance but didn’t sell out for him.
The model to do this with free agency, comp picks, trades and play style is right there demonstrated by the goat coach recently doing a rebuild.
I doubt Bill is even sold on Mac, but it doesn’t matter, he built a team. He fortified the trenches. He called games to protect his players.
Once he had a core he went on a free agent shopping spree.
He’s back to simmering the pot right now. If he transitions from Mac it will be seemless.
If we build it a QB will come. (I should follow this advice about a wife.)