- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,967
- Liked Posts:
- 697
No Mendy No Rizzo No watching
Well, not watching much of it..
Not smart!
No Mendy No Rizzo No watching
Well, not watching much of it..
Lol.. been watchingNot smart!
If near no-hitters (7IP + ) was a real stat I'm pretty sure Arrieta would be leading. I think this is #3 for him
What did Brandon Phillips do in this game? Read a lot of comments about him being an asshole. I know he is, just wondering if something particular happend tonight
I was kinda hoping they invited manny up not so much to see him get a few AB ( PH ) which would of been cool but more so to continue coaching with the kids especially Baez now..
Now that you mention it he does have a quick glove, I have no complaints about his defense thus far..I would venture to guess that Manny and Baez will have a long summer together.
I want to say this that no one brings up. Baez may have the quickest slap tag in the game. I never really paid attention when he was in the minors but since he has been up. His tags have been incredible. He wastes little time between him catching the ball and slapping the tag. He was the reason Billy Hamilton was out the other day. I know most people dont notice but he may have one of the quickest hands I have ever seen in this game. No bullshit. He kils Castro in that department and I am a Castro protecter.
Now that you mention it he does have a quick glove, I have no complaints about his defense thus far..
Wonder if it just coincidence or has Baez helped a bit with castillo run of catching would be stealers, taking nothing away from castillo of course.
Baez is much better at defense than Castro from a SS perspective. I think we see Castro get moved over to 2B or flipped for pitching this winter. I read an article comparing the two but I recall which site it was on, but was a big edge to Baez. Baez still needs to prove he can hit ML pitching consistently before we should trade Castro IMO.
Castillo has been great. No lie. He has caught like 13 out of 15. He was horrendous in the first half. Castillo is actually a great defensive catcher as much as people dont want to see it. But, Baez glove is special with those tags. He is so quick which is why people dont worry about him hitting. Now, he is Castro like with making mistakes at short but his skills are tremendous.
Let the bat play. He will always strike out but Im gonna say about 200 at bats into next year the light will come on. I meant what I said that he has pitch recognition. Since he has been in the majors, he has decided to swing before recognition. I would like him to calm down and show his special ability. I know this sounds weird and I may be completely wrong but I think it takes one at bat for him to take off.
Baez is much better at defense than Castro from a SS perspective. I think we see Castro get moved over to 2B or flipped for pitching this winter. I read an article comparing the two but I can't recall which site it was on, but was a big edge to Baez. Baez still needs to prove he can hit ML pitching consistently before we should trade Castro IMO. Obviously love his potential but I don't want to trade a 3x AS and put all the money on a guy with a 46% K rate.
Not sure who you think is saying this but the only comments to the contrary I've heard is with respect to Castillo's pitch framing.
As I've said elsewhere, not sure why you'd trade Castro before Baez at this point. Castro is a grand total of 3 years 8 months and 8 days older and already proven to be at the very least a fringe all-star player year to year and some would argue he's more than that. I'm not amazingly high on Castro as I think he's more a 3-4 WAR/season player but comparatively to Baez who's yet to show he can hit over the mendoza line it's fairly risky to bank on Baez. Even if you believe Baez will get better by that point he's maybe what 1-2 years younger than Castro is now? And that ignores the risk involved with him.
Not sure who you think is saying this but the only comments to the contrary I've heard is with respect to Castillo's pitch framing.