It wasn’t Fields fault

Was Fields the reason for the L?

  • No, Claypool let him down

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, DJ Moore let him down

    Votes: 1 3.6%
  • No, offensive line let him down

    Votes: 5 17.9%
  • No, playcalling let him down

    Votes: 11 39.3%
  • No, defense let him down

    Votes: 1 3.6%
  • No, Mooney let him down

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not too sure

    Votes: 10 35.7%

  • Total voters
    28

Novoitus

Mitch Trubisky Fan
Joined:
Sep 14, 2012
Posts:
3,525
Liked Posts:
2,435
This loss was not on Fields. But I want to know if you all agree

Please be respectful of peoples choices in the poll
 

gallagher

Ave Atque Vale
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
8,207
Liked Posts:
7,305
Location:
Of Semi-Fixed Address
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
Fields has his faults and there were plays he clearly wants back. Right now he is overmatched. He has good plays but if he cant turn those into consecutive scoring drives that keeps the pressure on the other team, then he is good as gone and on another team with his next contract.

I think our OC is overmatched. If I am Poles, I imagine that I would want to go out and offer another team's OC our HC job next year. We have one WR that is 100% dog and this game plan needs to be about feeding him. Our RBs are adequate but nothing that you can build an identity around. The OL has two players that I would keep into next year. Kmet doesnt look like he is worth his contract.

I go with Playcalling let Fields down because it is the single biggest problem, in my view.
 

Jester

White Guy
Joined:
Aug 21, 2010
Posts:
7,637
Liked Posts:
3,697
The Chicago Bears Organization let him down, just like the previous dozens of QBs before him.
 

Spitta Andretti

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,792
Liked Posts:
14,400
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Fields has his faults and there were plays he clearly wants back. Right now he is overmatched. He has good plays but if he cant turn those into consecutive scoring drives that keeps the pressure on the other team, then he is good as gone and on another team with his next contract.

I think our OC is overmatched. If I am Poles, I imagine that I would want to go out and offer another team's OC our HC job next year. We have one WR that is 100% dog and this game plan needs to be about feeding him. Our RBs are adequate but nothing that you can build an identity around. The OL has two players that I would keep into next year. Kmet doesnt look like he is worth his contract.

I go with Playcalling let Fields down because it is the single biggest problem, in my view.

The offensive coordinator can't throw the ball for him. Can't stop him from not throwing and taking unnecessary sacks.
 

Jester

White Guy
Joined:
Aug 21, 2010
Posts:
7,637
Liked Posts:
3,697
What do you do with a quarterback who can't process what's happening in front of him? The Bears have lots of problems. Fields is, unfortunately, one of the biggest.
He is definitely part of the problem, but the first responsibility of an organization is to build a team that doesn't put the entirety of winning football games on the QBs shoulders. That is why I believe Justin Fields is not the primary problem with this team.

I'm not absolving Justin Fields of all responsibility for winning games.
 
Last edited:

Forty-six

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 8, 2020
Posts:
645
Liked Posts:
1,026
The o-line is an abomination, two years running. However, Joe Burrow had a brutal o-line in his year one and yet he popped. You knew right away he had "it."

My support for JF is on the ropes.
 

sevvy

Get rich, or try dying
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
13,926
Liked Posts:
20,294
Location:
Charlotte, NC
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
I don't know if I care anymore. Just get rid of everyone and let's see who they bring in to continue the TRADITION of being a fucking circus.
 

The Galloping Ghost

Guest
He is definitely part of the problem, but the first responsibility of an organization is to build a team that doesn't put the entirety of winning football games on the QBs shoulders. That is why I believe Justin Fields is not the primary problem with this team.

I'm not absolving Justin Fields of all responsibility for winning games.

They have problems everywhere. The issue is when you have guys open, decent protection and your quarterback just stands there like a deer in headlights it doesn't matter what's around him.

We're seeing that asking Fields to run a modern NFL offense is simply not sustainable. He's just sooooo slow at everything that matters. His checks, his audibles, his drops, his processing... There's zero urgency. Its impossible to succeed on offense with those deficiencies.
 

Calabis

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
19,879
Liked Posts:
11,082
Location:
Texas
He is mentally shattered and at this point if something positive doesn't happen, he is done.
 

freddylamar

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 22, 2012
Posts:
832
Liked Posts:
1,093
I just don’t see a leader in him unfortunately. No expression on his face, no holding people accountable. I don’t see him rallying the offense. Just looks like he’s not interested in the game. Another jersey to add to the umpteen other bears busts that take up the back of my closet. I’m truly over this team, unfortunately. A lifetime wasted rooting for mediocrity. I’m deflated already, after two weeks.
 

wonky73

4th round grade on Trubisky
Joined:
Dec 7, 2016
Posts:
3,562
Liked Posts:
3,095
"It's all a problem" - John "sleepy" Fox
 

Jester

White Guy
Joined:
Aug 21, 2010
Posts:
7,637
Liked Posts:
3,697
They have problems everywhere. The issue is when you have guys open, decent protection and your quarterback just stands there like a deer in headlights it doesn't matter what's around him.

We're seeing that asking Fields to run a modern NFL offense is simply not sustainable. He's just sooooo slow at everything that matters. His checks, his audibles, his drops, his processing... There's zero urgency. Its impossible to succeed on offense with those deficiencies.
I guess I look at it like this. I agree with what you state above, but I am in the school of thought that QBs need to have a period of time to learn the game not laying on their back or running for dear life. Rhythm and establishing on field relationships with your receivers is critical. The OC needs to set them up for that success, and I don't believe they have done a good job of it.

If I were the OC with a rookie Justin Fields I would start him off slowly by running the ball of course, and setting him up with short high percentage passes. I would also leverage his mobility and encourage him to use it to throw the ball and buy time. I would work this in the offseason until the routes became mechanical to him. When an Oline and OC are as bad as they have been on the bears any non HOF bound QB is going to be bad. They failed him in his rookie year and beyond that, and I think it's breaking him.

You may be right, his processor may very well be slow, I definitely think Mitch's processor was slow. However, there are so many other problems that I'm not confident he has even been given a reasonable chance for us to make that determination.
 
Last edited:
Top