Joe johnson v Ben gordon

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
and here we go!

Joe johnson save for one year, has shot 35-38% from the 3pt line. 1 year in pheonix he shot 40%. His career average is 37% which coincidentally is also what he's shooting this year. Last years percentage was 36. He's not a great shooter. More than anything he's not a catch and shoot, shooter. he's more of an isolation kinda guy.

On the other hand, ben gordon has gone below 40% shooting ONCE in his career. it's this year in detriot. This year has been the worst year BG has shot from the 3pt line. IT"S THE VERY WORST! HE HAS BEEN SHOOTING! with that said, he's shooting at 38%. Yeup. BG at his worst is better from JJ at his best at the 3 pt line. Also, he can catch and shoot.

Derrick rose likes to run. this is a running team. we're great on a fast break. JJ is an older player. towards the end of his huge contract, he's going to look really bad. really bad. Here's why. How man shooting guards do you know that are 245 lbs? I know of only one. JJ. Yeah, he has a great post up game, but how good is a 250lb shooting guard going to look at 32? Age creeps up on us all, and i'm not sure JJ will be able to play the sg position later in his career. The speed of the game is getting quicker and quicker, and JJ will just get slower and slower. his size isn't helping him.

i'd rather have gordon's speed than johnson's strength. Have i mentioned gordon is younger than johnson?

On the other hand, JJ is averaging 4.6 rbs to gordon's 2.9. Cause that's what you really want from your guards. rebounding.

To boot johnson is a better ball handler than gordon. he averages two fewer turn overs per game than gordon.

JJ is averaging 1.3 more assists per game than gordon. i'm not sure if that's more or less impressive given atlanta's tendency for isolation offense. Also if you look at gordon's only year playing with rose, he did average 1.5 more assists per game for the season.

Furthermore JJ's getting you 2 extra ppg. Although his career number is 18ppg, it'd be more legitimate to consider it to be 20ppg. BG gives you 18 ppg. I'm not sure who i would give more credit to. BG has been the focus of a terrible offensive system. He's taken more difficult/clutch shots. MORE IMPORTANTLY! bg wasn't always playing starters minutes. he's often been asked to come off the bench.

Besides this year, in which johnson is shooting 46% from the field, johnson hovers betwen 44-45%. his career average is 44%. On the other hand ben gordon gives you: 43% for his career shooting percentage. YES, that number includes his absolutely awful year in Detroit. Interestinglty gordon shot 42@ twice. This year and the year the team broke down. he shot 41% his rookie year. Asides from that his range has been 43% -45%.

However, gordon is a better ft shooter.

his rookie year he shot 90 more ft's than johnson at : 86% to johnson 75%

SADLY, in o5/06 Johnson shot 60 more ft's than gordon. Also he shot 79% to ... sadly gordon was at a carreer low with 78% yeup. career low of 78%

in 06/-07 gordon shot 126 more ft's than johson. he shot them at a thunderous 86%!!!!! johnson shot 74. yeah.. seeing a trend?


In 07/08 Gordon was money at the line. he shot 90%!!!!! Johnson shot 83%. Sadly he shot 86 more free throws that year. Have i mentioned johnson plays 10 minutes more per game than gordon? Also he's handling the ball more than gordon? hmm. i guess i should have. not only does it explain the small dip, it also amplifies how much better gordon is at getting to the line.

In o8/09 Gordon made 20 more free throws than johnson. He shot 86%, and johnson shot 82%.

Since gordon plays 10 entire minutes less, that's practically an entire quarter(!!!!!), than johnson; and he's a better shooter than johnson at the line, i'm declaring gordon the hands down better player at generating fouls. More importantly, in spite of few minutes, from the day that gordon came into the nba, johnson has been to the line more often ONLY for 2 seasons in his career.

Here's an interesting fact, after coming over from Phoenix, Johnson's team has made the playoffs twice! Since gordon was playing for the bulls, the bulls missed the playoffs once. we got rose that year.

since he's come to atlanta. JJ has made it the playoffs twice. In o7/08 he gave 20 ppg of 40% shooting. 44% behind the arc.
Obviously the bulls didnt make the playoffs that year. the year before the bulls made it to the second round. :) !!! Gordon scored 20.4 ppg at 41% fg% and shooting 43% behind the arc.

In fact ben gordon has been playing this way for a while now. BG in his second year in the league, 05/06, he shot 40% fg% 36% from the 3, but he scored 21 ppg. Both their rookie playoff years were rather terrible (in spite of that ben gordon's was significantly better. 40% v 27%. In spite of the fact that gordon played few minutes than johnson, and was still a rookie. i believe johnson was in his second/third year in the nba. )

But enough of the past, lets get to the latest playoff games. Keep in mind that Gordon was injured during the playoff series against the celtics. Last year johnson averaged 16.4 ppg at 40% shooting and 33% from the 3pt line. he shot 66% from the free throw line. that's really really really bad. In fact everyear except 04/05 johnson has shot below 69% from the free throw line. WHAT THE CRAP!!!!! last year he has 2.9 turn overs per game

on the other hand gordon took a bit of a dip in terms of efficiency, but a lot of that was the injury. he scored 24ppg on 38% fg% while shooting 37% from the 3pt line. he shot 85% from the ft line. in fact for the past couple years in the playoffs gordon's worse performance from the line was 25-36. Gordons usually money from the line during the playoffs. In o4/05 he shot 20-25, 06-07 he shot 58-63 last year he shot 49- 56. conversely johnson was 12-35.
 

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
if you had signed ben gordon at 8 million assuming JJ get's the max offer, you're not getting much more bang for you buck than you would have gotten with gordon.

also his rebounding numbers, steals, and blocks, he's not giving you more there either. really i dont see how this guy is a max player.
 

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
pinkizdead wrote:
But enough of the past, lets get to the latest playoff games. Keep in mind that Gordon was injured during the playoff series against the celtics. Last year johnson averaged 16.4 ppg at 40% shooting and 33% from the 3pt line. he shot 66% from the free throw line. that's really really really bad. In fact everyear except 04/05 johnson has shot below 69% from the free throw line. WHAT THE CRAP!!!!! last year he has 2.9 turn overs per game

on the other hand gordon took a bit of a dip in terms of efficiency, but a lot of that was the injury. he scored 24ppg on 38% fg% while shooting 37% from the 3pt line. he shot 85% from the ft line. in fact for the past couple years in the playoffs gordon's worse performance from the line was 25-36. Gordons usually money from the line during the playoffs. In o4/05 he shot 20-25, 06-07 he shot 58-63 last year he shot 49- 56. conversely johnson was 12-35..

despite the fact that johnson's team made it to the second round, they played 4 more games than the bulls. Jonhson only scored 10 more points last season than gordon. Johnson had 180 pts in a total of 428 minutes.

Ben gordon had 170 pts in 304 minutes.

really? you want to five this guy a max offer? why?
 

Dpauley23

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
1,496
Liked Posts:
4
pinkizdead wrote:
if you had signed ben gordon at 8 million assuming JJ get's the max offer, you're not getting much more bang for you buck than you would have gotten with gordon.

also his rebounding numbers, steals, and blocks, he's not giving you more there either. really i dont see how this guy is a max player.

Where are you getting this 8 million offer from
 

Dpauley23

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
1,496
Liked Posts:
4
pinkizdead wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
But enough of the past, lets get to the latest playoff games. Keep in mind that Gordon was injured during the playoff series against the celtics. Last year johnson averaged 16.4 ppg at 40% shooting and 33% from the 3pt line. he shot 66% from the free throw line. that's really really really bad. In fact everyear except 04/05 johnson has shot below 69% from the free throw line. WHAT THE CRAP!!!!! last year he has 2.9 turn overs per game

on the other hand gordon took a bit of a dip in terms of efficiency, but a lot of that was the injury. he scored 24ppg on 38% fg% while shooting 37% from the 3pt line. he shot 85% from the ft line. in fact for the past couple years in the playoffs gordon's worse performance from the line was 25-36. Gordons usually money from the line during the playoffs. In o4/05 he shot 20-25, 06-07 he shot 58-63 last year he shot 49- 56. conversely johnson was 12-35..

despite the fact that johnson's team made it to the second round, they played 4 more games than the bulls. Jonhson only scored 10 more points last season than gordon. Johnson had 180 pts in a total of 428 minutes.

Ben gordon had 170 pts in 304 minutes.

really? you want to five this guy a max offer? why?

Who said they wanted to sign Johnson the max?
 

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
I know of no one who wants to sign him to a max contract...the question is "is he an upgrade over Ben Gordon or any other shooting guard this team has had since 1998..." the answer is yes, not even close.

Also, do you know WHY he had dismal playoff numbers last year?

Comparing Gordon and Johnson is not fair...to Gordon. Johnson is a better player, plain and simple...I need no stat sheets. ONe is a specialist, the other, an allstar.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
Ben Gordon is entirely irrelevant to the discussion on Joe Johnson. Joe Johnson is a free agent, Gordon is under contract to Detroit. We only have a choice between signing Joe Johnson or not signing Joe Johnson, we don't have a choice between signing Joe Johnson or signing Ben Gordon.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Dpauley23 wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
if you had signed ben gordon at 8 million assuming JJ get's the max offer, you're not getting much more bang for you buck than you would have gotten with gordon.

also his rebounding numbers, steals, and blocks, he's not giving you more there either. really i dont see how this guy is a max player.

Where are you getting this 8 million offer from

I think he means 9 mill as in the 6/54 deal.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Shakes wrote:
Ben Gordon is entirely irrelevant to the discussion on Joe Johnson. Joe Johnson is a free agent, Gordon is under contract to Detroit. We only have a choice between signing Joe Johnson or not signing Joe Johnson, we don't have a choice between signing Joe Johnson or signing Ben Gordon.

Its a hypothetical since we had a chance to sign BG and will likely have a shot at signing JJ. Its also a reasonable premise since letting one go was used as rationale in pursuing the other.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
We didn't let Gordon go to get Joe Johnson. We let Gordon go to get LeBron, Wade or Bosh.
 

Dpauley23

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
1,496
Liked Posts:
4
houheffna wrote:
I know of no one who wants to sign him to a max contract...the question is "is he an upgrade over Ben Gordon or any other shooting guard this team has had since 1998..." the answer is yes, not even close.

Also, do you know WHY he had dismal playoff numbers last year?

Comparing Gordon and Johnson is not fair...to Gordon. Johnson is a better player, plain and simple...I need no stat sheets. ONe is a specialist, the other, an allstar.

Why don't you tell us why he had dismal playoff numbers. If he just faced the Heat I would off said ya Dwade just shut this guy down, but he frickin faced Delonte West
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Shakes wrote:
We didn't let Gordon go to get Joe Johnson. We let Gordon go to get LeBron, Wade or Bosh.

And if none of those guys are available, who are we going after? JJ is supposedly one of our back up options.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
TheStig wrote:
Shakes wrote:
We didn't let Gordon go to get Joe Johnson. We let Gordon go to get LeBron, Wade or Bosh.

And if none of those guys are available, who are we going after? JJ is supposedly one of our back up options.

Joe Johnson for the max would be worse than getting nothing, so hopefully not him. David Lee and a cheaper SG is my plan B, because that seems like the best bang for the buck. Also I doubt the Knicks try to retain Lee, they need to use their cap space on new players so they can tell their fans that all the selling off of assets and sucking has been worth it.
 

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
Basically everything stig said. sorry i meant 9. i've been doing that all day today. JJ turned down a pretty big deal from the hawks, so i'm assuming he wants more cash. i think it was 4 years/60 million?
 

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
i think we'll see a lot of bad contracts next year. Besides the big 3, the next tier of agents shall be over payed.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
pinkizdead wrote:
Basically everything stig said. sorry i meant 9. i've been doing that all day today. JJ turned down a pretty big deal from the hawks, so i'm assuming he wants more cash. i think it was 4 years/60 million?

Yeah I think he turned down 15 million per year. It's pretty clear he's going to be aiming for the max. Between the Hawks and the Knicks, it's hard to see him not getting it from someone. The Hawks are the "young team on the rise" and will be killed by their fans if they don't try to keep JJ, the Knicks will be desperate to use their cap space.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Shakes wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
Basically everything stig said. sorry i meant 9. i've been doing that all day today. JJ turned down a pretty big deal from the hawks, so i'm assuming he wants more cash. i think it was 4 years/60 million?

Yeah I think he turned down 15 million per year. It's pretty clear he's going to be aiming for the max. Between the Hawks and the Knicks, it's hard to see him not getting it from someone. The Hawks are the "young team on the rise" and will be killed by their fans if they don't try to keep JJ, the Knicks will be desperate to use their cap space.

I wouldn't rule out the heat either. If they can convince Utah or Phoenix to take MB for Amare or Boozer, getting JJ at the max makes them a contender with a halfway decent center.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
TheStig wrote:
Shakes wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
Basically everything stig said. sorry i meant 9. i've been doing that all day today. JJ turned down a pretty big deal from the hawks, so i'm assuming he wants more cash. i think it was 4 years/60 million?

Yeah I think he turned down 15 million per year. It's pretty clear he's going to be aiming for the max. Between the Hawks and the Knicks, it's hard to see him not getting it from someone. The Hawks are the "young team on the rise" and will be killed by their fans if they don't try to keep JJ, the Knicks will be desperate to use their cap space.

I wouldn't rule out the heat either. If they can convince Utah or Phoenix to take MB for Amare or Boozer, getting JJ at the max makes them a contender with a halfway decent center.

Hmm, I guess if they send James Jones + Bealey they would have enough space to absorb Amare/Boozer and sign Wade/JJ. Interesting idea, but they'd basically be three guys and scrubs, not sure how far they could go with that.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
Shakes wrote:
TheStig wrote:
Shakes wrote:
pinkizdead wrote:
Basically everything stig said. sorry i meant 9. i've been doing that all day today. JJ turned down a pretty big deal from the hawks, so i'm assuming he wants more cash. i think it was 4 years/60 million?

Yeah I think he turned down 15 million per year. It's pretty clear he's going to be aiming for the max. Between the Hawks and the Knicks, it's hard to see him not getting it from someone. The Hawks are the "young team on the rise" and will be killed by their fans if they don't try to keep JJ, the Knicks will be desperate to use their cap space.

I wouldn't rule out the heat either. If they can convince Utah or Phoenix to take MB for Amare or Boozer, getting JJ at the max makes them a contender with a halfway decent center.

Hmm, I guess if they send James Jones + Bealey they would have enough space to absorb Amare/Boozer and sign Wade/JJ. Interesting idea, but they'd basically be three guys and scrubs, not sure how far they could go with that.

They don't even have to do anything with james jones. They have option and can cut him. They are also pretty much set at the 1-4. Chalmers is good enough to start with that group, all he has to do is shoot open jumpers. In future years, they will spend the mle and boozer won't call for a max deal. He will get 12 mill per year max and a starting salary of about 10, leaving them with about 8 mill left and will be able to offer a near mle deal. Riley knows how to put together teams. NY also scares me because they will resign TMac for the min and if even remotly healthy, him and tow max guys is dangerous too. Thats why I wanted to clear room for another guy. Rose and Noah are both better than both the number 3/4 guys on either of those teams.
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
I'm not sure Boozer will go that cheaply. Utah can afford to give him a decent deal with AK coming off the books after next year, so there's competition for him. Also if I'm Boozer and I see Joe Johnson getting a max deal then I wouldn't be willing to sign for that team for significantly less.

NY don't scare me too much unless they get LeBron. Any plan that revolves around TMac being healthy seems about as realistic as the previous "if Eddy Curry comes into camp in shape" plans. They also have the problem of having sold off all their future assets, so what's a team of JJ, Amare and Gallinari ever going to do? Second round maybe.
 

Top