Luke
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 25, 2016
- Posts:
- 1,986
- Liked Posts:
- 1,857
I can't watch. Is Membou available at 10 in this draft? I really want him.
yeah, he will be gone before the 10th pick.
Last edited:
I can't watch. Is Membou available at 10 in this draft? I really want him.
I don't see how Carolina passes on him, aren't they still considering 35 year old Adam Thielen as their #1 receiver? Seems like they would want to upgrade there asap.Carter at 4 would be a hell of a win for NE. It's not too unlike MHJ falling to 4 (though I was a Nabers guy). Since we don't really have an active draft thread... I'll drop this hear and hope he finds a way into the top 9 so we can have someone else fall to us. I'd love as many options as possible on the board when we pick.
to whom?yeah, he will be gone before the 10th pick.
NE, Jax, LV, Jets, NOto whom?
They do have Legette, who they took in the 1st, so I could see a bit of apprehension to taking a WR in the 1st again. That said, at 8 overall, McMillian might be the best blend of ceiling and floor. I can't imagine their fans would hate it. Sanders or McMillian finding their way into the top 9 is music to my ears.I don't see how Carolina passes on him, aren't they still considering 35 year old Adam Thielen as their #1 receiver? Seems like they would want to upgrade there asap.
Pros about drafting OL at #10
Address OL in round 1
Possible future combo LT/G
Need youth/depth
Cons about drafting OL at #10
Seems like none of these OL guys overall rating justifies a typical top 10 pick
Could have #1 rated rb/te available to pick...and both rated higher overall than the OL.....and either prob contribute immediately (con on Jeanty is that it's a deep class for rb and one could be had in round 2/3)
End of day.....can see Poles/BJ moving to warren/jeanty vs OL at #10
I'm coming around on this. I do want the Bears to focus on building depth on the OL. However, if the guy isn't a clear BPA, we can just build depth later in the draft. At minimum, I know there will be plenty of good guards. OT seems to be a tough one this year. The con to this approach is that we may be desperate for an LT this time next year if Braxton and Kiran don't pan out.Cons about drafting OL at #10
Seems like none of these OL guys overall rating justifies a typical top 10 pick
I'm coming around on this. I do want the Bears to focus on building depth on the OL. However, if the guy isn't a clear BPA, we can just build depth later in the draft. At minimum, I know there will be plenty of good guards. OT seems to be a tough one this year. The con to this approach is that we may be desperate for an LT this time next year if Braxton and Kiran don't pan out.
More than likely if you draft a tackle at #10 this year they will be sitting on the bench for a year(or a good part of 2025) as its not likely they would outplay braxton as a rookie.
Not sure thats the best use for that pick if you want to compete now
Why im getting a bad feeling its going to be jeanty even tho it should be OL/DL.
A good combine workout isn't going to make NE pass on any of the top 4 players in this draft for Membou.NE, Jax, LV, Jets, NO
I like Banks @ 10. What I like more is the flexibility that the Bears' free agency, and the number of early picks the Bears have, has created.
Just don't pick Jeanty. But even that pick I could live with.
Yea, the part I keep thinking about is that it’s somewhat of a necessary evil to get a LT in the first if you want a good one. There are few exceptions in the top 15 or so LTs. I am probably just experiencing some FOMO right now, but it all really comes down to there being a legitimate LT there or not. If there is one, like maybe Membou will become one, then it's hard for me to pass. I guess similar can be said of a lot of premium positions.More than likely if you draft a tackle at #10 this year they will be sitting on the bench for a year(or a good part of 2025) as its not likely they would outplay braxton as a rookie.
Not sure thats the best use for that pick if you want to compete now
Why im getting a bad feeling its going to be jeanty even tho it should be OL/DL.
I’m pretty sure Caleb, Rome, and Wright will all be impact players. These are the only first round picks he’s had. Gordon is pretty damn good and well respected around the league. Brisker looked like the MVP of the defense before the Carolina game. He even caused a turnover on his way to IR.I don't care what position that we draft... but its time we add an IMPACT player somewhere.
Poles has had a ton of premium picks and this team doesn't have premium talent. I am not saying Poles didn't add anything.. just not enough for all the draft capital he had.
If Caleb has a great year all will be forgiven, but if he is still a question mark at the end of the season critics are going to look very hard at this selection. I think Jeanty will be gone and just adding an average tackle isn't going to cut it.
I don't know enough about CAR to be sure they would take McMillan, but I think if you look at their skillsets Tet would pair well with Legette. I liked Xavier in college but I do think he's more of a rich mans gadget guy/poor mans DJ Moore than a true #1 outside receiver like McMillan looks like he can be.They do have Legette, who they took in the 1st, so I could see a bit of apprehension to taking a WR in the 1st again. That said, at 8 overall, McMillian might be the best blend of ceiling and floor. I can't imagine their fans would hate it. Sanders or McMillian finding their way into the top 9 is music to my ears.