John Scott To Rangers

Status
Not open for further replies.

derosabomb

Joecawks is a dope
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
9,066
Liked Posts:
3,630
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
Man, I'm lost -why is that funny? You do know that the Rangers have been known as the Broadway Blueshirts (granted usually by some really old guys), right? Or did you think they were talking about themselves and were wrong?

Or did they get the height and weight wrong? Or was it that since they were supposedly in Canada that they had no business not using metric?

:shrug:

yeah wrigley cawks why is that shit funny you needed to post it twice?
 

Gunzaan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Mar 27, 2011
Posts:
5,224
Liked Posts:
1,865
Scott is an asset for the regular season as protection for the "superstars," but he has no place on the playoff roster, so no big loss, considering how the team is playing in the regular season.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
There's a replacement that will be announced tomorrow. Not as big as Scott, but can skate play and kill penalties.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Man, I'm lost -why is that funny? You do know that the Rangers have been known as the Broadway Blueshirts (granted usually by some really old guys), right? Or did you think they were talking about themselves and were wrong?

Or did they get the height and weight wrong? Or was it that since they were supposedly in Canada that they had no business not using metric?

:shrug:

Because all they can possibly say positive about Scott is that he is big and they try to make it sound like he is something actually worth wile.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats

derosabomb

Joecawks is a dope
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
9,066
Liked Posts:
3,630
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
i just wanna know why you thought it was funny
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
Anyone else see the TSN Analysts rip on the Rangers (and Scott) for this deal? I found it humorous.

Sather seems to have a love affair with guys who can fight but can barely play hockey. He gave Boogard a ridiculous contract for a player of his skill.
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
they went from nash to scott. funny shit

Sather's still their GM -and he doesn't exactly have a reputation for doing sane things ... so it sorta fits.

I did read some material - from 300 Level blog today (it was posted a couple of days back I think) - about front office shenanigans with the Hawks, about how Stan was ticked off at Quenneville (and other things) -for not using the personnel provided (or something along those lines) - that to me said Scott all over it - as over the past season plus it was clear that Quenneville was not that big on using a guy like Scott in the lineup -or probably more accurately didn't agree with the philosophy of skating a goon -and tried jamming a square peg into a round hole. Scott was and is a goon, not a hockey player.

When you have a goon on your team and dress him, you cannot ever try skating 4 lines. The entire 4 lines thing is something I am not quite sure that Quenneville has ever quite managed to get. You don't really need 4 lines, if your top 3 are effective -but I've written that particular line before.

Trying to make Scott a hockey player, was not a particularly workable idea, but Quenneville tried and tried again. Stan signed Scott to a 2 year contract, and I'm fairly sure that came from a lack of communication between the GM and the coaching staff- as clearly last season, a guy like Scott didn't fit in the plans of the coaching staff. . . I do figure that maybe the Prez (marketing-guru) is basically Pulford v 2.0 -excepting one big fact -and that was that Pulford did play the game, and played it in the Original 6 ... so Pulford knew hockey (still does to a degree -but the line written about how a game passes guys by over time -is something that applied to Pulford).

IIRC Pulford had a pretty decent record as head coach in the 70's (I'm thinking with the Kings back in their purple and gold days). . . that's something that no one can ever say about the former Cub Prez (unless the Hawks sign him as a free agent and then skate him a few games ...which itself might actually be some worthwhile mareketing).

Anyways -Scott -well, his time with the Hawks seem to point to the validity of behind the scenes issues within the organization.
 

GrinderBall41

Sox/B'Hawks/Bears/Purdue
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
666
Liked Posts:
166
Location:
NW Indiana
Funny convo between two meatheads on the other team after my hockey game monday:

Meathead forward:"Did we make any moves today?"

Meathead goalie: "We traded John Scott"

Meathead Forward: "Whaaaaaat?!?!? For who?"

Meathead goalie: "A second round 2012 pick I think"

Meathead Forward: "Ugh, and it will be like the last pick in the second round too. We are stupid."


This prompted me and Dmelt36 to rush out of the building before we started bleeding from our ears.
 

Captain Iago

Giver of Occular Proof
Donator
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
5,905
Liked Posts:
1,974
Man, I'm lost -why is that funny? You do know that the Rangers have been known as the Broadway Blueshirts (granted usually by some really old guys), right? Or did you think they were talking about themselves and were wrong?

Or did they get the height and weight wrong? Or was it that since they were supposedly in Canada that they had no business not using metric?

:shrug:

I don't know what's funny about it - but I can think (and remind you, I bet) of something ironic.

Smurfs. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top