Jordan Love

coolio

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 4, 2019
Posts:
705
Liked Posts:
476
No QB should want to sit and learn for years. It’ll make them lose out on money. I think packers will end up trading him if Rodgers has another elite year
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
13,789
Liked Posts:
9,584
He’s an unknown commodity what could the packers get for love? No one is giving up a 1st for him
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,992
Liked Posts:
9,441
Packers have a better eye for evaluating QB talent. trade for him. he'll cost less in draft picks huh
 

JP Hochbaum

Well-known member
Joined:
May 22, 2012
Posts:
2,041
Liked Posts:
1,279
I made a thread about this very thing. I could see giving up two second round picks or him and having him play behind Foles or take over for him.
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
I made a thread about this very thing. I could see giving up two second round picks or him and having him play behind Foles or take over for him.
Thank God you are the Bears GM........LMFAO

2 2nd rd picks for a third stringer
 
Last edited:

Midwaymonster75

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 3, 2013
Posts:
2,602
Liked Posts:
2,239
I made a thread about this very thing. I could see giving up two second round picks or him and having him play behind Foles or take over for him.
Hes not playing behind Foles. Anyone who trades for Love is or at least should be looking at him to start day one.
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Packers have a better eye for evaluating QB talent. trade for him. he'll cost less in draft picks huh
So why did they take one last year when they have one for the foreseeable future right in front of their eyes?
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Hes not playing behind Foles. Anyone who trades for Love is or at least should be looking at him to start day one.
He’s not playing behind Rodgers either....he was the third stringer
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,082
Liked Posts:
6,901
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
I made a thread about this very thing. I could see giving up two second round picks or him and having him play behind Foles or take over for him.
Ummm what? Giving up 2 second recliners for Love? Even Pace is laughing at you.
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
No QB should want to sit and learn for years. It’ll make them lose out on money. I think packers will end up trading him if Rodgers has another elite year
Him and Rodgers both have contracts signed until 2023......Who do you think will be resigned or extended?
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,992
Liked Posts:
9,441
So why did they take one last year when they have one for the foreseeable future right in front of their eyes?

Rodgers will leave at any moment. he's not Tom Brady. he's not playing until he's 50.

Favre was the same age when Rodgers was drafted. for posterity.
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Rodgers will leave at any moment. he's not Tom Brady. he's not playing until he's 50.

Favre was the same age when Rodgers was drafted. for posterity.
He has 104 million due the next 3 years. I think he’ll be around to collect.
 

mecha

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
12,992
Liked Posts:
9,441
He has 104 million due the next 3 years. I think he’ll be around to collect.

you might be onto something there, pal. therein lies the difference between him and Brady lol

if only Rodgers married a rich broad that generates a lot of money huh
 

Hutch1975

Active member
Joined:
Oct 2, 2020
Posts:
405
Liked Posts:
194
My favorite teams
  1. Milwaukee Brewers
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Edmonton Oilers
  1. Brigham Young Cougars
I made a thread about this very thing. I could see giving up two second round picks or him and having him play behind Foles or take over for him.

Two seconds?

No.

The 2022 second-round pick and the two compensatory 6th-rounders the Bears have this year.
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Two seconds?

No.

The 2022 second-round pick and the two compensatory 6th-rounders the Bears have this year.
For a third stringer?
 

Hutch1975

Active member
Joined:
Oct 2, 2020
Posts:
405
Liked Posts:
194
My favorite teams
  1. Milwaukee Brewers
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Edmonton Oilers
  1. Brigham Young Cougars
For a third stringer?

He is a former first-round pick, and they were sitting him deliberately. Rodgers was able to play all 16 games this year... so there is potential upside.

I'd probably make it more a conditional pick... but if pressed, I'd go one second-rounder to go with the two late-round picks.
 

Leomaz

Pissing people off the right way!
Donator
Joined:
Jul 15, 2012
Posts:
14,948
Liked Posts:
6,826
Location:
In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Indiana Hoosiers
  2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
He is a former first-round pick, and they were sitting him deliberately. Rodgers was able to play all 16 games this year... so there is potential upside.

I'd probably make it more a conditional pick... but if pressed, I'd go one second-rounder to go with the two late-round picks.
He is a former first round pick who didn’t play in 1 game as Rodgers played in 16 and Tim Boyle, an UDFA played in 8 games.....very little I might add. So he is still a third stringer. I give a 5th at best.

Plus how many games was Love on the active roster?
 
Last edited:

Anytime23

Boding Well
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
36,950
Liked Posts:
35,653
The Packers have had decades of QB competence. If they're willing to trade a high round QB after 1 season, especially with this Rodgers drama, that should tell you to stay away.
 

Top