- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,076
- Liked Posts:
- 579
- Location:
- The open road
i agree with this to an extent. what the cubs needs is the location and the features. but as far as the actual field, it's a dump and should be demolished, in my opinion. they could easily build a new ballpark with the same features in the same location: open outfield, stand configuration roughly the same, proximity of seats to the field, charming architecture, ivy. but make the facilities better, get more bathrooms, vendors, etc. in there. i think if you build a new wrigley or a new camden yards for instance, and put it out in the suburbs, the cubs will actually lose a huge percentage of their fanbase. let's face it, people like the urban location and all that entails.
not for nothing, wrigley is one of the two biggest destination ballparks for visiting fans. if you lose the location, reds fans aren't necessarily going to drive out to lombard (i'm just picking burbs) to see a game.
maybe there's a case that if they built something new even with the same features, the charm won't be there anymore? maybe? i'm on the fence here a bit. i've seen tons of cubs game there, and it's a dump. sure, it's our dump, but it is still a dump. the concrete is failing down, there's posts, seats are uncomfortable, facilities for both men and women stink. undeniable charm though!
I don't like Wrigley too much personally... Either scrap it or vast repairs are needed that I don't see why you would do. The place is so rich on history... But so was Busch, original Yankee stadium, etc. Etc. Teams can move on from a stadium but the Cubs unfortunately won't until there is either an accident or we win a World Series... I actually feel like that's the only aura that keeps the place up is that it never saw a winning team personally.
sent from Jimmer range using Tapatalk