Keith Law Rates Sox as #12 Minor League System

Parade_Rain

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
9,995
Liked Posts:
3,624
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
It's trolling because you are inferring something about your team in a Sox thread.

I'm thrilled where we are as an organization
I have not inferred anything about "my team" in this thread. I even went so far as to mention the Cardinals. That fact remains that #12 is a long way from #1. Instead of being a crying baby, perhaps you could handle a little baseball discussion as to the difference in prospects of a #12 versus the difference in prospects in a #1. In the end it's unproven talent.
 

Parade_Rain

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
9,995
Liked Posts:
3,624
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
Is Castro out of jail yet?
When was Jason in jail?

The Cubs finished 1st in what league? Who knew? Who was President back then? Or better yet, was the United States even formed yet? Was it Rounders that they won in? What was their name back then?
I didn't mention the Cubs. The Sox are rated #12 in Law's eyes. Who is #1 isn't relevant, except that it's a long way from #12 to #1. You'll find that out checking out the Top 100 Prospects list.

Um....... and when has that happened for your team?
That's not relevant. The fact is managing a decent farm system that has prospects that are desirable in trades or prospects that can come up and help the club is tough on any team. As Dews had mentioned, there just need to be enough prospects in the system as a team competes and needs to make trades. Look at the Yankees. Even a team that can buy their way to championships dried up their system by trading most of the quality/potential big leaguers away. Hahn, Epstein, Cashman, Duquette, etc. It doesn't matter. It's a tough act to balance.

You should also note that I gave the Sox GM a compliment. It's easy to see why the baseball forums devolve around here. Dews has his hands full with the rays of sunshine posting in this forum.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I have not inferred anything about "my team" in this thread. I even went so far as to mention the Cardinals. That fact remains that #12 is a long way from #1. Instead of being a crying baby, perhaps you could handle a little baseball discussion as to the difference in prospects of a #12 versus the difference in prospects in a #1. In the end it's unproven talent.
I didn't cry but you've never shown to be adept at figuring things out like that on here.

I'd not be surprised at all if the#1 team is behind the#12 team at seasons end. It's that close. Now maybe that isn't close for you
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
These ranking are pretty much ...to me and anything that has the Cubs ranking #1 in anything good makes me really question it.
They have below avg pitching but I agree with Law in that they have some ultra rate quantity and quality of hitting prospects. Haven't seen a team that stacked since maybe the mariners of the late 80s
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
When was Jason in jail?

I didn't mention the Cubs. The Sox are rated #12 in Law's eyes. Who is #1 isn't relevant, except that it's a long way from #12 to #1. You'll find that out checking out the Top 100 Prospects list.

That's not relevant. The fact is managing a decent farm system that has prospects that are desirable in trades or prospects that can come up and help the club is tough on any team. As Dews had mentioned, there just need to be enough prospects in the system as a team competes and needs to make trades. Look at the Yankees. Even a team that can buy their way to championships dried up their system by trading most of the quality/potential big leaguers away. Hahn, Epstein, Cashman, Duquette, etc. It doesn't matter. It's a tough act to balance.

You should also note that I gave the Sox GM a compliment. It's easy to see why the baseball forums devolve around here. Dews has his hands full with the rays of sunshine posting in this forum.
Like Hahn did with his farm in getting another Ace this off-season
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I didn't cry but you've never shown to be adept at figuring things out like that on here.

I'd not be surprised at all if the#1 team is behind the#12 team at seasons end. It's that close. Now maybe that isn't close for you
As Dews said its NOT being number one...the minors only purpose its to help the major squad with call ups and trades
 

Parade_Rain

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
9,995
Liked Posts:
3,624
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
I didn't cry but you've never shown to be adept at figuring things out like that on here.

I'd not be surprised at all if the#1 team is behind the#12 team at seasons end. It's that close. Now maybe that isn't close for you
The #1 "Minor League System" is going to be behind the #12 "Minor League System" at the end of this season? I don't see how that happens unless the Sox stink up the joint and Hahn trades away every MLBer for prospects. Fat chance there.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
The #1 "Minor League System" is going to be behind the #12 "Minor League System" at the end of this season? I don't see how that happens unless the Sox stink up the joint and Hahn trades away every MLBer for prospects. Fat chance there.
The Sox prospects aren't ready yet..they may spend much of if not all of the year down the minors. And that would mean the big club was healthy and probably contenders which is a good thing. Add to it a top pick in the draft and they move up. Now for the#1 squad they lose ratings of guys that start or will be starting shortly with the big club. That's a good thing really. So what are the chances? I don't know but it's a lot more probable than your implying
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
I'd say that's how it should go...you don't want to always to be a top five farm...it probably means the big league club is not good...I think you want your teams to be say top half and if you move to top five to be like a wave with ups and downs in efforts to get the big club moving to the top five spots
 

Parade_Rain

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
9,995
Liked Posts:
3,624
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Illinois Fighting Illini
I'd say that's how it should go...you don't want to always to be a top five farm...it probably means the big league club is not good...I think you want your teams to be say top half and if you move to top five to be like a wave with ups and downs in efforts to get the big club moving to the top five spots
The Cardinals were the 6th ranked MiLB system in 2014 and #1 the year prior. That's why I suggested using them as a bell weather. I want the best farm possible and develop talent down on the farm, not just to trade away. Using the farm to trade is why the Yankees depleted it all. Hahn doesn't want to do that. The Cards are the gold standard here. Both Chicago teams would be wise in the long run to build the teams via the farm and sprinkle with a few vets.
 
Last edited:

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
The Cardinals were the 6th ranked MiLB system in 2014 and #1 the year prior. That's why I suggested using them as a bell weather. I want the best farm possible and develop talent down on the farm, not just to trade away. Using the farm to trade is why the Yankees depleted it all. Hahn doesn't want to do that. The Cards are the gold standard here. Both Chicago teams would be wise in the long run to build the teams via the farm and sprinkle with a few vets.

with the cardinals its not that everyone is this soon to be stud in the beginning. IMO they develop better than any other team.


Sent from My Iphone 6 Plus Using Tapatalk
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
The Sox prospects aren't ready yet..they may spend much of if not all of the year down the minors. And that would mean the big club was healthy and probably contenders which is a good thing. Add to it a top pick in the draft and they move up. Now for the#1 squad they lose ratings of guys that start or will be starting shortly with the big club. That's a good thing really. So what are the chances? I don't know but it's a lot more probable than your implying

pending on how many cubs players play all year in the bigs could drop them in rank.


Sent from My Iphone 6 Plus Using Tapatalk
 

Top