didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 21,350
- Liked Posts:
- 10,160
Again, the Packers do have the leverage in that they don't have to trade him YET. They can wait till June. As long as they are ok with the compensation coming in next years draft. The Jets can't wait that long to sign Rodgers.
But once you get to a certain point, the Packers risk losing Rodgers for next to nothing.
Do the Packers really want to hold a HOF QB hostage though that played 18 years for them just to squeak out an extra draft pick? Does their relationship with him matter over the next 50 years? Personally, I think the Packers are going to do the right thing and trade a player that wants to be traded sooner rather than later. And they might not get the exact compensation they want, but at least it will be in this year's draft.
But once you get to a certain point, the Packers risk losing Rodgers for next to nothing.
Do the Packers really want to hold a HOF QB hostage though that played 18 years for them just to squeak out an extra draft pick? Does their relationship with him matter over the next 50 years? Personally, I think the Packers are going to do the right thing and trade a player that wants to be traded sooner rather than later. And they might not get the exact compensation they want, but at least it will be in this year's draft.