Let the "Moss to Chicago" calls begin ... Vikes waive Moss

Status
Not open for further replies.

WearShades

New member
Joined:
Jan 28, 2010
Posts:
560
Liked Posts:
47
Would not be shocked to see Dallas claim him. Not that they need WRs, but they're beyond desperate and Jones is not the type to worry about paying him the prorated salary he's making this year.
 

USCChiFan

Crow's Nest
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
8,003
Liked Posts:
1,105
Location:
Behind you
I want the Bears to pick Moss up, but they likely won't. They're too enamored w/ Johnny Knox and Devin Hester running the wrong routes and watching Jay Cutler getting intercepted.
 

Derkach77

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 11, 2010
Posts:
1,293
Liked Posts:
266
Location:
Chicago
We never want to pickup a proven veteran receiver...never.
 

JJ-28

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
548
Liked Posts:
97
Location:
Loveland CO
Any team can put a claim in for him, but the order in which he is picked up does go by team record, from worst to best. Which I why I think he lands in San Diego for the rest of the season, they are still playing for the post season.

Sorry but I believe your wrong, the rules change after the trade cut off date. What you said only cover a player before the trade cut off date and after that it does go worst to best team.

NFL waiver order
Team Win Loss Tie Percent Schedule strength Opp record
1. Buffalo Bills 0 7 0 0.000 0.667 34-17-0
2. Carolina Panthers 1 6 0 0.143 0.519 27-25-0
3. Dallas Cowboys 1 6 0 0.143 0.549 28-23-0
4. San Francisco 49ers 2 6 0 0.250 0.508 30-29-0
5. Denver Broncos 2 6 0 0.250 0.559 33-26-0
6. Detroit Lions 2 5 0 0.286 0.538 28-24-0
7. Minnesota Vikings 2 5 0 0.286 0.549 28-23-0
8. Cincinnati Bengals 2 5 0 0.286 0.571 28-21-0
9. Cleveland Browns 2 5 0 0.286 0.640 32-18-0
10. San Diego Chargers 3 5 0 0.375 0.583 35-25-0
11. Arizona Cardinals 3 4 0 0.429 0.566 30-23-0
12. Jacksonville Jaguars 4 4 0 0.500 0.414 24-34-0
13. St. Louis Rams 4 4 0 0.500 0.441 26-33-0
14. Oakland Raiders 4 4 0 0.500 0.450 27-33-0
15. Washington Redskins 4 4 0 0.500 0.500 28-28-0
16. Seattle Seahawks 4 3 0 0.571 0.407 22-32-0
17. Chicago Bears 4 3 0 0.571 0.431 22-29-0
18. Miami Dolphins # 4 3 0 0.571 0.500 25-25-0
19. Philadelphia Eagles # 4 3 0 0.571 0.500 27-27-0
20. Green Bay Packers # 5 3 0 0.625 0.439 25-32-0
21. New Orleans Saints # 5 3 0 0.625 0.439 25-32-0
22. Tennessee Titans 5 3 0 0.625 0.467 28-32-0
23. Houston Texans 4 2 0 0.667 0.535 23-20-0
24. Indianapolis Colts 4 2 0 0.667 0.545 24-20-0
25. Kansas City Chiefs 5 2 0 0.714 0.380 19-31-0
26. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 5 2 0 0.714 0.431 22-29-0
27. New York Giants 5 2 0 0.714 0.438 21-27-0
28. Baltimore Ravens 5 2 0 0.714 0.440 22-28-0
29. Atlanta Falcons 5 2 0 0.714 0.451 23-28-0
30. New York Jets 5 2 0 0.714 0.471 24-27-0
31. Pittsburgh Steelers 5 2 0 0.714 0.608 31-20-0
32. New England Patriots 6 1 0 0.857 0.420 21-29-0
 
Last edited:

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Vikings claim him from themselves. jk
 

Cover3

wat
Joined:
Jun 4, 2010
Posts:
269
Liked Posts:
31
Location:
windy city
i'm on the fence about this one (whether we should pursue moss or not)
 

Rush

Fuck it, Go Deep
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
13,285
Liked Posts:
7,400
Location:
North Carolina
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Carolina Hurricanes
  1. Duke Blue Devils

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
The Bears did not put in a claim for him.
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
The Bears would have won too. I don't think it would of hurt. He's making a little under 4M and the defense would keep an eye on him and other recievers would be open. It really wouldn't hurt. If it did not work, the Bears could just sit him or place him on waivers again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top