Let's say Front Office decides Fields isn't the answer and drafts a QB. Smart play is to still Start Fields next year.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mighty Joe Young

Living in Troll's Heads Rent-Free for Decades
Joined:
Feb 8, 2021
Posts:
11,964
Liked Posts:
10,008
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
To me, here's why.

Right now, when you look at the state of the Bears, the offensive line is shit and the coaching is shit.

Let's say they draft whomever QB x is, and replaced the coaching staff with better coaches.

Start Fields, and let the rookie sit at least half the year, up until the trade deadline.


By doing that, you take a situation where if you didn't Fields walks away for nothing, and instead you have this situation:

Fields begins the season starting. Lets say you draft new offensive linemen. They will need time to gel. You need time to see what you got. Let Fields take the beating from those growing pains instead of your shiny new toy.

If Fields starts out bad in the new offense, you make the call by game 3-4 and switch QBs, by which the offensive line, if the draft got it right, is now solid for your rookie QB to play behind. You let the rookie learn on the job the rest of the year and Fields walks.

If Fields catches fire, and looks good for the first half of the season, now you have flexibility. Do you want to trade him before the deadline? You might get some actual value out of him if this scenario happens. Or, he could just end up being so damn good, that the GM and staff determine it was bad coaching holding him back this whole time, and you re-sign Fields and have a situation where you now have the flexibility to either trade or just hold onto your first round overall pick.



Thoughts?


*Edit* - Yeah, I thought Fields was in his 4th year, not his 3rd. I changed the title and adjusted the post because I still think starting him next year is the right move, no matter who we draft, for the reasons I stated.

For you trolls who think I can never admit when I make a mistake, there you go.
 
Last edited:

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,629
Liked Posts:
9,293
Location:
Laughing at Tom Brady
You want to Andy Dalton Fields? It just sounds overly complicated and highly unlikely to work out. Seems like something the Bears would do!

Cleanest thing to do is just trade him after the season once they are sure they can get Williams or maybe Maye. Keep Bagent as a developing QB2 game manager. You don’t need a worthless vet like Peterman as QB3, don’t we have a QB coach?

I think with another offseason they can fix the oline completely. The next rookie will be coming into an entirely different situation than Fields did. Poles for as bad as he is set himself up with outs, something Pace wasn’t smart enough to do.
 

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,629
Liked Posts:
9,293
Location:
Laughing at Tom Brady
I’ll say this as well. If they finish outside of the top 2 and can’t get one of these QB it isn’t out of the realm to just keep Fields. Maybe give him a Jordan Love type deal for two years. Yes he has flaws but he is still a starter in the NFL with potential. I’m not giving him up until I know I have a new option.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
10,087
Liked Posts:
4,266
His fifth year option is going to be an astronomical number and fully guaranteed once the Bears offer it. **** no to this idea.
 

mattb78

My threads are FTO !
Joined:
Sep 18, 2012
Posts:
3,968
Liked Posts:
4,452
Location:
Orlando
His fifth year option is going to be an astronomical number and fully guaranteed once the Bears offer it. **** no to this idea.
Its 23 million. A 23 million dollar option to have a guy sit the bench instead of getting help for your starting QB?

Draft a QB this year and let him sit all next year while Fields finishes up his time here in Chicago.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
10,087
Liked Posts:
4,266
If your premise is that Justin Fields ain't the guy I just don't see why you wouldn't trade Justin Fields for a second this off-season and blow the money on a one-year deal for Kirk Cousins. Take the picks now, spend the money while you have the flexibility and if your attitude is "**** it he's not the quarterback we have in our long term plans anyways" then there's really not a lot of harm in giving Cousins the reins.
 

Sparks500

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 28, 2014
Posts:
2,897
Liked Posts:
2,267
Trade him NOW! Teams are getting desperate for QBs. His value, even injiured, is at its highest point. He’s doesn’t have IT.
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
19,300
Liked Posts:
17,877
Location:
MICHIGAN
If your premise is that Justin Fields ain't the guy I just don't see why you wouldn't trade Justin Fields for a second this off-season and blow the money on a one-year deal for Kirk Cousins. Take the picks now, spend the money while you have the flexibility and if your attitude is "**** it he's not the quarterback we have in our long term plans anyways" then there's really not a lot of harm in giving Cousins the reins.
The new hc and hopefully new gm shouldn’t be handcuffed to anyone on this roster. If new hc wants a new qb fields should be traded and they have the picks and money to easily move on.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
19,985
Liked Posts:
4,823
You have to offer the fifth year option in the off-season between the third and fourt hyear.
May of next year, which, is after the 2024 draft. if the Bears did draft Williams, it would be stupid to pick up his 5th year option. They could still tag him if I miracle happened later in the year.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
10,087
Liked Posts:
4,266
Trade him NOW! Teams are getting desperate for QBs. His value, even injiured, is at its highest point. He’s doesn’t have IT.
If the intention is to trade him in the off-season then this is the correct take. If someone believes in him they will want to secure him ASAP.
 

Mighty Joe Young

Living in Troll's Heads Rent-Free for Decades
Joined:
Feb 8, 2021
Posts:
11,964
Liked Posts:
10,008
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Its 23 million. A 23 million dollar option to have a guy sit the bench instead of getting help for your starting QB?

Draft a QB this year and let him sit all next year while Fields finishes up his time here in Chicago.

For some reason, I thought Fields was in year 4 already. I adjusted my post, because I do still see value in starting him next year for my stated reasons. But no, I would not in this case pick up the 5th year option.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
46,558
Liked Posts:
35,794
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
You have to offer the fifth year option in the off-season between the third and fourt hyear.
Is there a hard date to that? As in, the official start of the league calendar?
 

HeHateMe

He/Himz/Hiz
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
59,789
Liked Posts:
52,774
For some reason, I thought Fields was in year 4 already. I adjusted my post, because I do still see value in starting him next year for my stated reasons. But no, I would not in this case pick up the 5th year option.
So, you don't watch the games and don't pay attention to what year it is, yet post these essays on what you think should happen. Do you have dementia?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top