- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 18,865
- Liked Posts:
- 4,659
Restructuring the next two years would be tricky until after the next CBA.One reason the Mack trade made sense was that it wasn't just a win-now move it also is one of the rare times you're signing a six year contract and you have a lot of flexibility with it. Even assuming the Bears restructure the next two years, you're still in a fairly decent position to have flexibility to get away from the last year (Mack's 10th year, age 32 season). You likely will keep Fuller (age 27) and Jackson (turns 26 in December) through the life of that deal. With those three, assuming just normal talent around them and you're fine defensively.
The Bears should be spending every waking moment trying to find a long-term QB capable of winning because THEY HAVE THE LONG TERM D capable of winning right now. All this team needs is a solid QB and they're set the next five years. Obviously every resource should go to finding and securing that.
30% rule.