ClydeLee
New member
- Joined:
- Jun 29, 2010
- Posts:
- 14,829
- Liked Posts:
- 4,113
- Location:
- The OP
A rangers beat reporter eh, suure that makes sense.
Why must I be Ladd? via da Tapatalk
Why must I be Ladd? via da Tapatalk
So besides Anisimov, who goes to Pittsburgh? Kruger? Ok, but they'll want more.Ima throw it out there.... back in 2009.... nobody thought Chicago would go get Jay Cutler.
It was treated with the same "Lol sure" as we talking about Malkin.
Then Jerry Angelo gave up the fucking world to get Jay Cutler.... don't assume this can't happen lol.
It might work out similarly horribly for the team.... but don't assume shit like this can't happen.
So besides Anisimov, who goes to Pittsburgh? Kruger? Ok, but they'll want more.
Hammer, Seabrook, Panarin?
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
So besides Anisimov, who goes to Pittsburgh? Kruger? Ok, but they'll want more.
Hammer, Seabrook, Panarin?
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
Yeah no.
Ares, your like my best friend IRL, but I will say this is a less than 1 percent chance it happens. Not enough prospects, not enough cap space, and we would lose Panarin.
Kobe was undoubtedly the best player in the game at that time. The same cannot be said about Malkin. I don't pay attention to hockey like I do the NFL or NBA, but I would think trading the rookie of the year for Malkin would be considered a bad trade.Giving up Panarin in this deal is like the stupid Kobe Trade rumor.. The proclamation is Malkin would ok his nmc to go to Chicago because he'd like to play with Panarin.
It's back in 08-2010 whenever that was where Kobe to Chicago was rumored to be okay if he was traded to Chicago. He was all about okay the deal to Chicago if he could play with Deng... yet everyone talking trade details would be throwing Lou Deng into the trade offers. And Kobe having the right to deny or agree to the trade made any Deng included offer make no sense, it all had to be Gordon, Heinrich, whoever the hell else. But of course the Bulls didn't have anyone good enough to put in an offer but Deng so of course that went nowhere.
Personally I would trade Kane before I traded Panarin, but that's why I just got traded to Carolina.
Yep agreed. This trade makes no sense. It's a luxury move, but it kills our depth.I would guess we would need to give up Panarin... I would hate it.
Yep agreed. This trade makes no sense. It's a luxury move, but it kills our depth.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
I would guess we would need to give up Panarin... I would hate it.
Panarin is the future young star for the Hawks. I'd say he is untouchable.
https://twitter.com/stevezipay/status/745327502357372928
"Hearing Blackhawks seriously kicking tires on Evgeni Malkin. Will be interesting to see how they create cap space..."
Why won't this rumor die? This is just getting weird now.
All of the rumors created by the clickbait bloggers said the only reason Malkin wanted to go here was to play with Panarin.Unless Malkin told Pitt trade me or I'm going to Russia, then we could maybe get something done. Other than that I do not want to give up Panarin for him, cause if I'm Pitt that's who I'm asking for.