beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,750
- Liked Posts:
- 3,741
IMO, Happ will have a better career than Schwarber or Almora
Think that's fair assumption on Almora though i think it kind of depends on what you're looking for. People are far to down on Almora. He could very easily be a 3+ win player which is approaching all-star level that typically starts around 4. He was worth 1.2 wins in 323 PAs last year. And while that is sorta cherry picked because Maddon purposefully started him vs LHP more often than a normal player would see their preferred pitcher, there's reason to believe he's not as platoon heavy as some would have you believe. He was 12-62(.193) vs RHP with 3 walks(4.5%) and 11 K's(16.7%) in april and may last year. The rest of the season he was 39-126(.309) with 3 walks(2.2%) and 25 k's(18.9%). And to increase the sample size some, he hit .286/.324/.400 vs RHP in 2016 over 74 PAs with 5.4%/20.3% bb/k rates.
So, when people suggest he can't lead off I'm not sure I agree. He definitely can lead off vs LHP. He's a career .320/.377/.503 hitter vs LHP over 168 PAs with 8.3%/13.1% bb/k rates. Clearly he has a little work to do with regard to RHP but we're talking about a guy with 440 career MLB PAs. RHP wasn't something that killed him in the minors. In his best 2 years in the minors(2013 and 2015) he hit .308/.350/.473 and .257/.297/.384 at A and AA. Keep in mind that his BABIP in 2015 was .291 for a guy routinely well above that(career .331 in MLB).
Simply put, I think at this point you can probably safely argue for Happ's bat being a far safer bet. But, I think you shouldn't sleep on Almora. His ability play well above average defense in CF along with a better than average bat is a good recipe for value. Kevin Kiermaier is a career .262/.319/.431 hitter and has average over 4 wins a season. Granted I think you could make the case that he's better defensively than Almora but I think Almora has a chance of being better offensively.
As for Happ vs Schwarber, that's a tough sell in my book. Happ isn't going to offer you much more defensively than Schwarber. That is to say he's better but it's not like the gap between them is huge and a lot of people would argue defense is overrated(not me personally but the case can be made). Regardless, if you're comparing their bats then I think it's worth mentioning that in pretty much a nearly ideal rookie season Happ hit .253/.328/.514 with .261 ISO and was worth 113 wRC+. Schwarber's career numbers are .222/.329/.471 with .249 ISO and was worth 112 wRC+. And I think it's more than fair to suggest the player Schwarber was for 277 first half PAs out of his 764 career PAs(36%) is not the player he is. Also Happ's .261 ISO isn't sustainable. Mike Trout's career ISO is .260.
As with Almora, I think people are sleeping on Schwarber's upside. You could legitimately make the case that he was a better minor league hitter than Bryant. Bryant hit .327/.426/.667 in the minors. Schwarber hit .334/.432/.619. So you're talking better average and on base and while Bryant did show more power, Schwarber's .249 ISO in the majors as compared to Bryant's .240 ISO would suggest Schwarber has a touch more power. Clearly Schwarber hasn't developed in the majors as quickly as Bryant has. But we've all seen glimpses of that kind of hitter in Schwarber. He's a career .311/.408/.623 hitter over 71 postseason PAs when you're facing the best of the best in terms of pitching. Thing is he's only had 1437 PAs as a pro(665 in the minors). Happ as an example of a guy who pretty quickly made it to the majors had 978 minor league PAs. Factor in Schwarber missing almost a full year adding to some of the rust early last year and it's not all that surprising he's taken a bit to come into his own.
Either way, it's obvious the front office thinks the guy that he was in the minors is the guy he's going to be. They effectively dealt Eloy over him and Eloy was a top 5 prospect in all of baseball. Theo and company haven't always been right on pitching but they really haven't made many mistakes when it comes to hitting. Basically every hitter they've taken high in the draft or signed to decent IFA money has become good with the exception of Eddy Martinez though he still has time. You could argue Soler is a bit of a disappointment but as a player he's not really that bad. It's the fact he can't stay on the field.