Bearshomer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,517
- Liked Posts:
- 1,503
I'd expect the player to want to play and I'd expect the HC to protect him from himself.Honestly, I don't know if players are supposed to play injured or not. When they are pulled by the coach, the player gets criticized. If they stay in and play like hot garbage, the coach gets criticized.
I'd expect the player to want to play and I'd expect the HC to protect him from himself.
Same here, but in the end the decision made will get criticized.
Mike Shanahan is essentially a slave owner forcing other negros to fight each other
There definitely was in this situation. The story already broke before the game that Shanahan had ignored the doc's advice. When seeing RG3 further aggravated the injury, the decision should have been obvious. You also have a backup that has proven himself capable. Why the **** are you so hesitant to hand him the reigns with a 14 point lead? Seattle did what they should and game planned according to the Griffin injury from there. Not only did Shanahan jeopardize the health and welfare of his franchise QB but he put his team in a bad position.There was no winning in that situation like ijustposthere stated
i thought the whole nfl was slave trade?