More Illegal Immigration Talk

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
WASHINGTON - During a White House visit, Mexican President Felipe Calderon on Wednesday condemned Arizona's tough new immigration law, calling it discriminatory to Mexicans.

Calderon said Mexico and the United States should work together to develop an immigration policy that did not force people to live in the shadows "with such laws as the Arizona law, which is forcing our people to face discrimination."



Calderon, whose remarks were translated from Spanish, was speaking at the start of a state visit to the United States during a joint press conference with President Barack Obama.





Obama also stepped up his criticism of Arizona's controversial immigration law Wednesday, calling it "misdirected" and warning that it has the potential to be applied in a discriminatory fashion.







Speaking at the news conference with Calderon, Obama called for overhauling the nation's immigration laws but said that can't be done unless Republicans support it.





The controversy over the Arizona law, which would make it a state crime to be in the country illegally, hung over Calderon's visit. Both leaders oppose the law, with Obama directing the Justice Department to review it for possible civil rights violations, and Calderon's government issuing a travel warning for Arizona, out of concern that Mexicans face an adverse political environment there.





Calderon said the Arizona law criminalized migration and could encourage discrimination. He also called for the U.S. and Mexico to work together to solve the complex, politically sensitive immigration issue.





"We can do so if we create a safer border, a border that will unite us instead of dividing us, uniting our people," Calderon said. "We can do so with a community that will promote a dignified life in an orderly way for both our countries."





Almost twice as many people support the Arizona law as those who oppose it, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll this month. It found that 42 percent favored it, 24 percent opposed it and another 29 percent said they were neutral.







Obama has promised to start work on an immigration overhaul, but he's also warned that Congress may not have the appetite to take on the sensitive issue this year. He pointed out Wednesday that he can't get the 60 votes he would need in the Senate to pass an immigration bill unless some Republicans step forward. That Republican support could be hard to come by for Obama in an election year.





The two leaders spoke during a joint news conference in the White House Rose Garden following a private meeting. Obama will host Calderon at a state dinner Wednesday night.



No it is not discriminatory towards Mexicans, unless Senor Presidente you are suggesting the Mexicans make up the majority of the ILLEGAL immigrants. See it just discriminates towards illegal immigrants, whether mexican or any other ethnicity.



No it doesn't criminalize migration. It criminalizes ILLEGAL migration. The issue isn't even remotely complex, it is actually extremely cut in try, if you are here illegally you broke the law. Doesn't get much simplier than that.



I get it the path to citizenship is long and is a very broken system. I get it, it needs to be overhauled, I won't argue there but this is a case of two wrongs don't make a right. To get citizenship is broken and wrong; coming here illegally is wrong. So in the end illegal immigration isn't right.



Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,207
"We can do so if we create a safer border, a border that will unite us instead of dividing us, uniting our people," Calderon said. "We can do so with a community that will promote a dignified life in an orderly way for both our countries."



Safer by letting huge amounts of drug to pour in? Fix your own fucking country and quit dumping your garbage here.



[quote name="supraman"]

Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?[/quote]



I've never even heard of anyone having a problem with LEGAL immigration. We are all included in that group at some point in our family history.
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dpAcUeC6js[/youtube]
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
[quote name="Tater"]



[quote name="supraman"]

Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?[/quote]



I've never even heard of anyone having a problem with LEGAL immigration. We are all included in that group at some point in our family history.[/quote]



Exactly I have a friend who is Venezulan. She has her green card. She works and pays her taxes. So I see her no differently than anyone other citizen that has a positive impact on society.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
[quote name="supraman"]

Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?[/quote]



In my case, being brown skinned, I was born in California, I am all for legal immigration, as long as the papers are evidence that it was legal, even though that alone is an oxymoron.

There really isn't such thing as "Legal" or "Illegal". Its still immigration, no matter which way you look at it.



I've been far to the right on this issue and I blame the rise of unemployment and constant wastes of money due to them thinking they're entitled to government subsidies. I also don't like their stupid intentions to breed more than 3 kids, within that also being their sense of entitlement as a result. That really is the problem here.



As they say, one bad apple ruins it for everyone else.
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,671
Liked Posts:
3,041
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
[quote name="CLWolf81"]
[quote name="supraman"]

Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?[/quote]



In my case, being brown skinned, I was born in California, I am all for legal immigration, as long as the papers are evidence that it was legal, even though that alone is an oxymoron.

There really isn't such thing as "Legal" or "Illegal". Its still immigration, no matter which way you look at it.



I've been far to the right on this issue and I blame the rise of unemployment and constant wastes of money due to them thinking they're entitled to government subsidies. I also don't like their stupid intentions to breed more than 3 kids, within that also being their sense of entitlement as a result. That really is the problem here.



As they say, one bad apple ruins it for everyone else.[/quote]

The only problem would be, say one day, because you're, in your own words, "brown", you go out one day without any identification and some Cop who hasn't been laid since the bicentennial tries to deport you because "you looked like an illegal immigrant."



Like it or not, the people that are going to enforece this are human, and they will profile someone else because they are just as prejudiced as the rest of humanity.



As long as the 4th amendment holds true for all citizens, it's a great reinforcing idea, but the minute some overzealous government agent breaks it I can see an epic shitstorm. The law would have been better if it was "the owner of any business hiring on an illegal alien will spend time in pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they can drive a cement mixer up their pooper.
 

Rdrhwke

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
1,428
Liked Posts:
0
[quote name="supraman"]



No it is not discriminatory towards Mexicans, unless Senor Presidente you are suggesting the Mexicans make up the majority of the ILLEGAL immigrants. See it just discriminates towards illegal immigrants, whether mexican or any other ethnicity.



No it doesn't criminalize migration. It criminalizes ILLEGAL migration. The issue isn't even remotely complex, it is actually extremely cut in try, if you are here illegally you broke the law. Doesn't get much simplier than that.



I get it the path to citizenship is long and is a very broken system. I get it, it needs to be overhauled, I won't argue there but this is a case of two wrongs don't make a right. To get citizenship is broken and wrong; coming here illegally is wrong. So in the end illegal immigration isn't right.



Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?[/quote]



Well, apparently Senor Presidente doesn't give a rat's ass about any other type of immigrant or that is exactly what he is saying. Then again, do Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson give a flying **** about anyone who isn't black? Unless it translates into TV face time for them.



What really incenses me is that some of these people are screaming as though they are owed citizenship. On what grounds? On the grounds they've lived here illegally for years and haven't been caught? They want to talk about how they have been paying taxes for years so therefore they should be granted citizenship no questions asked? Bullshit. I suppose they're paying for the education their kids are getting? Nope. doubt it.



As far as the lame ass argument that the illegals only take jobs that Americans wouldn't want anyways, the bleeding hearts should think about this. Maybe those fucked up ass low paying jobs wouldn't be so fucked up and low paying if not for the employers who knew they could get illegals to work for dogshit wages and basically put up with anything.





Like eveyone else has said, legally becoming a citizen can be a royal pain and the process could use improvement. But there is no excuse for not making the effort and just living in this country for years illegally and taking advantage of everything this country has to offer.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
[quote name="LordKOTL"]
[quote name="CLWolf81"]
[quote name="supraman"]

Here's a question to the board members, do any of you oppose LEGAL immigration? Do any of you have any problems whatsoever with legal immigrants?[/quote]



In my case, being brown skinned, I was born in California, I am all for legal immigration, as long as the papers are evidence that it was legal, even though that alone is an oxymoron.

There really isn't such thing as "Legal" or "Illegal". Its still immigration, no matter which way you look at it.



I've been far to the right on this issue and I blame the rise of unemployment and constant wastes of money due to them thinking they're entitled to government subsidies. I also don't like their stupid intentions to breed more than 3 kids, within that also being their sense of entitlement as a result. That really is the problem here.



As they say, one bad apple ruins it for everyone else.[/quote]

The only problem would be, say one day, because you're, in your own words, "brown", you go out one day without any identification and some Cop who hasn't been laid since the bicentennial tries to deport you because "you looked like an illegal immigrant."



Like it or not, the people that are going to enforece this are human, and they will profile someone else because they are just as prejudiced as the rest of humanity.



As long as the 4th amendment holds true for all citizens, it's a great reinforcing idea, but the minute some overzealous government agent breaks it I can see an epic shitstorm. The law would have been better if it was "the owner of any business hiring on an illegal alien will spend time in pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they can drive a cement mixer up their pooper.[/quote]



I was adopted, so I don't know where the hell I came from. Some say I'm hispanic. Others think European or South American. Others Middle Eastern. Either way, I have no idea.



Fact of the matter is, I have my identification, my birth certificate, my social security, and whenever I can afford it, my passport. I'm an American citizen. Nuff said. This won't apply to me unless they politely ask me. I certainly won't mind showing the authorities as long as they themselves cooperate.



That said, I won't be going to Arizona for awhile anyway, but I'm one of the few who actually approves of that law. Oddly enough, my partner who is Puerto Rican, also approves of it and he's from Texas... I know Puerto Rico is a US territory, so it doesn't really apply, but he's still considered "hispanic" by cultural heritage, ironic as it sounds. He's basically in agreement with me on this matter.



We'd go to Arizona if there were a reason, but there isn't at the moment, so we don't intend on it anytime soon.
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
The really sad thing is that when you give something away it is never appreciated as much as something you worked for to achieve.



It is also when of the things that really gets me upset is the lack of respect for our nation, our flag, our laws, our benefits and pride as a nation. When you try to be all things to all people you dilute what you really stand for as a nation. We are a melting pot and a beacon to the rest of the world but that does not mean you are welcome to come here and do as you please with a lack of respect for what the rest of us have worked so hard to achieve.



Our forefathers that immigrated here took pride in our nation, learned its history and language and many immediately jumped in defending our freedoms in the world wars. I am disheartened by those that think they are "entitled" no matter their reason.
 

jakobeast

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,903
Liked Posts:
21
Location:
yer ma's pants
If the government actually wanted to stop the illegal Mexicans(hey, lets face it, Arizona wants to stop the Mexicans) from entering the U.S., they would go after the businesses that hire them. And go after them hard.
 

jaxhawksfan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
2,490
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Back in Jax
KOTL, it may be late and I am tired so forgive the question if I have it wrong. Are you saying we shouldn't have this law because there are people who might not follow it to the letter?



There are cops out there right now who break procedure and do what they want all the time. This law does nothing to encourage more of it IMO.



Something has to be done, and if the Federal Gov't. isn't going to do the job then perhaps more states will start to. Some great suggestions have been presented by many people but the Federal Gov't. will simply not act upon them.



1. CLOSE THE FUCKING BORDERS (North and South). You can't dry the carpets until you stop the flood.

2. Build some fences that aren't easily climbed or cut through.

3. Put businesses that hire illegals out of business, and jail the employers. May also want to fine the shit out of them.

4. Stop all government aid and handouts to illegals except for emergency medical care.

5. Stop printing government paperwork in foreign languages. If you can't read the fucking paperwork, then you better find someone you trust who can help you.

6. No more "free" public schooling for your illegal kids. Yes, they need to be in school, but the extra stress you put on the teachers and the system requires more money and you will pay up front for your child's education. Don't like it? Go back home.



These are just suggestions that people have made as a place to start. When you no longer make it profitable and desirable for illegals to flood our nation, they will stay home in large part.



Are there people who have lived here illegally for many years that probably deserve to stay after some stiff penalties and fines? Sure, but they pay the fines, then move to the back of the line and undergo a different set of requirements than the people who didn't break the law to begin with.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
[quote name="CLWolf81"]
[quote name="LordKOTL"]
[quote name="CLWolf81"]



In my case, being brown skinned, I was born in California, I am all for legal immigration, as long as the papers are evidence that it was legal, even though that alone is an oxymoron.

There really isn't such thing as "Legal" or "Illegal". Its still immigration, no matter which way you look at it.



I've been far to the right on this issue and I blame the rise of unemployment and constant wastes of money due to them thinking they're entitled to government subsidies. I also don't like their stupid intentions to breed more than 3 kids, within that also being their sense of entitlement as a result. That really is the problem here.





IHF, I have to be honest the whole "melting pot" statement is out of date IMO. We were a melting pot for a long, long time and we aren't anymore. Previously we were a country searching for its own unique identity because let's face it we are still a relatively young country. But we have found our identity now, we have our own unique culture now.

As they say, one bad apple ruins it for everyone else.[/quote]

The only problem would be, say one day, because you're, in your own words, "brown", you go out one day without any identification and some Cop who hasn't been laid since the bicentennial tries to deport you because "you looked like an illegal immigrant."



Like it or not, the people that are going to enforece this are human, and they will profile someone else because they are just as prejudiced as the rest of humanity.



As long as the 4th amendment holds true for all citizens, it's a great reinforcing idea, but the minute some overzealous government agent breaks it I can see an epic shitstorm. The law would have been better if it was "the owner of any business hiring on an illegal alien will spend time in pound-me-in-the-ass prison until they can drive a cement mixer up their pooper.[/quote]



I was adopted, so I don't know where the hell I came from. Some say I'm hispanic. Others think European or South American. Others Middle Eastern. Either way, I have no idea.



Fact of the matter is, I have my identification, my birth certificate, my social security, and whenever I can afford it, my passport. I'm an American citizen. Nuff said. This won't apply to me unless they politely ask me. I certainly won't mind showing the authorities as long as they themselves cooperate.



That said, I won't be going to Arizona for awhile anyway, but I'm one of the few who actually approves of that law. Oddly enough, my partner who is Puerto Rican, also approves of it and he's from Texas... I know Puerto Rico is a US territory, so it doesn't really apply, but he's still considered "hispanic" by cultural heritage, ironic as it sounds. He's basically in agreement with me on this matter.



We'd go to Arizona if there were a reason, but there isn't at the moment, so we don't intend on it anytime soon.[/quote]



KOTL the way the law is written an officer cannot stop you just to ask to prove you are in the country legally. There has to be another reason to stop you before they can ask that. Now I know they can make something up but there isn't much you can do against that problem.
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,207
[quote name="supraman"]

KOTL the way the law is written an officer cannot stop you just to ask to prove you are in the country legally. There has to be another reason to stop you before they can ask that. Now I know they can make something up but there isn't much you can do against that problem.[/quote]



There's a lot of great posts in this thread.

IMO if someone is walking down the street and a cop asks for their papers with no reason to stop them, I highly doubt they would lose a lawsuit against that city for discrimination. As P.C. as everything has become, there's no way they could lose.
 

E Runs

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
658
Liked Posts:
0
The United States of America is either a nation of laws or it is not.
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,671
Liked Posts:
3,041
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
It's a bit more complex, but I can sum it up as such:



Illegal aliens bad, violation of 4th amendment worse. The law is redundant but I agree with it as long as the 4th amendment isn't violated.



Anyhow, to lighten the tone, if a cop pulls you over in Arizona and says, "Papers?" if you say "Scissors" do you win?
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
[quote name="LordKOTL"]

Anyhow, to lighten the tone, if a cop pulls you over in Arizona and says, "Papers?" if you say "Scissors" do you win?[/quote]



Did you think that up on your own?
 

IceHogsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,024
Liked Posts:
0
Lead Story on Fox News



Mexico's President Slams Arizona Law, Urges Congress to Pass Immigration Overhaul



WASHINGTON -- Mexican President Felipe Calderon on Thursday strongly denounced Arizona's new law clamping down on illegal immigrants and urged members of Congress to pass "comprehensive immigration reform."



In the first address to Congress by a foreign national leader this year, Calderon delivered a message that the two countries must cooperate to improve security along the often-violent border and control the flow of immigrants into the United States.



While Republican lawmakers welcomed Calderon's call for improved relations between the two countries, they jeered his lecture on how to fix the U.S. immigration system and his criticism of Arizona's new law.



"I think it's inappropriate for him to come in and criticize our law," Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told Fox News. "When we go down to Mexico, we don't do that to the Mexicans."



"The Arizona law is not the problem," he added. "The problem is the growing violence down the border and securing the border and the Obama administration enforcing federal law."



In his remarks Thursday, Calderon said he is "convinced comprehensive immigration reform is crucial to securing our border."



"But I strongly disagree with the recently adopted law in Arizona," he said. "It's a law that not only ignores reality, but also introduces racial profiling as a basis for law enforcement."



Calderon said his "government does not favor the breaking of the rules" and that he respects the right of any country to "enact and enforce its own laws."



"But what we need today is to fix a broken and inefficient system," he said. "We favor the establishment of laws that work and work well for all."







http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05 ... -congress/



Not one mention of this story on CNN.
 

jakobeast

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,903
Liked Posts:
21
Location:
yer ma's pants
[quote name="Stu Grimson"]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=es3hq0XM-cw[/youtube]​
[/quote]



Wow. What asshats.



Hey, all you ******* with no jobs willing to move. AZ is hiring!!!!
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
[quote name="jakobeast"]
[quote name="Stu Grimson"]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=es3hq0XM-cw[/youtube]​
[/quote]



Wow. What asshats.



Hey, all you ******* with no jobs willing to move. AZ is hiring!!!![/quote]



They legislate to arrest all illegal immigrants, so of course many of them leave, but now, the same Arizona legislature that passed the new law - including the bill's original sponsor - is considering bringing them back as "guest workers" because they can't find anyone to fill their work positions since they've vamoosed and companies are losing big, big money. LMFAO!
 

Top