in regards to the dirty comments, i wouldn't consider the pacers as a team "dirty." i would say that jeff foster is, but not the team as a whole. hansbrough has not shown me anything that you could call dirty so far. mcroberts had the elbow on derrick that was definitely a dirty play, but he's not a dirty player. i don't agree with rami that it's an ok basketball play, but i do agree that josh mcroberts is overall not a dirty player.
teams like the pacers and the bad boys pistons are very physical because honestly, they don't have the talent to stick with the other teams any other way. laimbeer, mahorn, they were not very skilled basketball players, or people in general. they made a living in the nba by taking people out, and that's what foster is trying to do in this situation. the difference between the two time world champion pistons and the 37-45 indiana pacers of course is that one had isiah thomas and joe dumars compared to danny granger and darren collison...
honestly, i'm not TOO bothered by the physical play IF:
1. derrick doesn't get injured
2. the bulls can play with the same level of physicality AND
3. derrick knocks down the easy free throws
hell this means the nba is worried about rose like they were worried about jordan! if rose can learn to play through the contact and score in new ways like jordan did, it can only help him in the long run.