supraman
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 8,024
- Liked Posts:
- 196
- Location:
- St.Pete, FL
So I seen the headline for this article and while reading it I was asking myself the question posed in the headline 'Are We Disappointed with Space Exploration?"
http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...e-disappointed-with-space-exploration/237136/
So for me to answer the question. Yes, yes I am disappointed with space exploration. I am a sci-fi nerd I want to see space stations and space docks where we build ships in space unimpeded by the gravity of earth. I want to see monstrous ships that can be seen from the planet.
So I am disappointed. The realist in me understands that the scientific advances from the Shuttle program have been huge and important but here's the rub, they aren't sexy. No one cares because it isn't sexy.
In the 60s going to the moon was sexy as hell, today it is Mars or building a permanent base on the moon. Sending robots is just flat out boring it isn't cool. No one gives a damn.
NASA is always being threatened with budget cuts and I've heard talks about it being completely axed too. The public hates paying for NASA, but I bet in the 50s and 60s they didn't mind. Back then we pushed the boundaries now we are humdrum.
I understand the argument that is brought up of the human cost of space exploration but I think we have to accept those costs, those that sign up to do it understand the risk and they accept the risk because they want to explore new frontiers, push us as a species forward, not send some robots to take pictures but to put boots on the ground, to make history. Who's more famous Neil Armstrong or the Mars Rovers.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...e-disappointed-with-space-exploration/237136/
So for me to answer the question. Yes, yes I am disappointed with space exploration. I am a sci-fi nerd I want to see space stations and space docks where we build ships in space unimpeded by the gravity of earth. I want to see monstrous ships that can be seen from the planet.
So I am disappointed. The realist in me understands that the scientific advances from the Shuttle program have been huge and important but here's the rub, they aren't sexy. No one cares because it isn't sexy.
In the 60s going to the moon was sexy as hell, today it is Mars or building a permanent base on the moon. Sending robots is just flat out boring it isn't cool. No one gives a damn.
NASA is always being threatened with budget cuts and I've heard talks about it being completely axed too. The public hates paying for NASA, but I bet in the 50s and 60s they didn't mind. Back then we pushed the boundaries now we are humdrum.
I understand the argument that is brought up of the human cost of space exploration but I think we have to accept those costs, those that sign up to do it understand the risk and they accept the risk because they want to explore new frontiers, push us as a species forward, not send some robots to take pictures but to put boots on the ground, to make history. Who's more famous Neil Armstrong or the Mars Rovers.