- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 21,858
- Liked Posts:
- 9,050
Well Scooter, you arent looking hard enough.I don't see it.
Well Scooter, you arent looking hard enough.I don't see it.
You spelled fraud wrong.I don't either...then again PG13 came into the league as a 6'6 combo guard then grew like 3 inches in one offseason and became the monster we now know.
You have some weird opinions on some great basketball players.You spelled fraud wrong.
Paul George will be the poster child for the Hall of Very Good. I don't think he's a guy that elevates your team.You have some weird opinions on some great basketball players.
Dude is a 1st team all defense guy who is capable of scoring 20+ a night...how does that not elevate your team? Unless you're of the opinion that only superstars elevate your team in which case, I guess I will be forced to agree on the basis that PG is not a superstar.Paul George will be the poster child for the Hall of Very Good. I don't think he's a guy that elevates your team.
The Thunder went from 47 wins the year before PG, to 48 and then 49. First round exits each season with Paul. I suppose I expect more from a guy that is capable of scoring 20+ a night for $19 million.Dude is a 1st team all defense guy who is capable of scoring 20+ a night...how does that not elevate your team? Unless you're of the opinion that only superstars elevate your team in which case, I guess I will be forced to agree on the basis that PG is not a superstar.
Fair point. Even if you wanted to blame Westbrook for their underwhelming performance, PG in theory should have more impact than 2 wins in 2 years.The Thunder went from 47 wins the year before PG, to 48 and then 49. First round exits each season with Paul. I suppose I expect more from a guy that is capable of scoring 20+ a night for $19 million.
Its kind of hard to up the wins when Westbrook plays Westbrook ball and is complete inefficient.Fair point. Even if you wanted to blame Westbrook for their underwhelming performance, PG in theory should have more impact than 2 wins in 2 years.
Guess it depends on if you think OKC got as many wins as they did because of Westbrook or in spite of Westbrook. Westbrook was especially inefficient this year though...only shot like 65% from the line and under 30% from 3.Its kind of hard to up the wins when Westbrook plays Westbrook ball and is complete inefficient.
Yea, he is a top 4 MVP candidate. Westbrook was awful all year and OKC role players sucked. Westbrook is so ball dominant that its got to be tough to play around. I know players say they love him, but I think thats only for his competitiveness.Guess it depends on if you think OKC got as many wins as they did because of Westbrook or in spite of Westbrook. Westbrook was especially inefficient this year though...only shot like 65% from the line and under 30% from 3.
PG was ok...something like 44/39/83. 28ppg though, didn't realize he was dropping so many buckets this year.
PG will likely end up 3rd in the MVP voting this year. He's an unreal player. IMO he's a legit Superstar and elevates his team.Guess it depends on if you think OKC got as many wins as they did because of Westbrook or in spite of Westbrook. Westbrook was especially inefficient this year though...only shot like 65% from the line and under 30% from 3.
PG was ok...something like 44/39/83. 28ppg though, didn't realize he was dropping so many buckets this year.
Guess you can duke it out with @Gustavus AdolphusPG will likely end up 3rd in the MVP voting this year. He's an unreal player. IMO he's a legit Superstar and elevates his team.
Teams jumping the Bulls to grab a PG because our front office leaks like a sieve.Trades galore! None of them involve the Bulls!
Minnesota trading ahead of the Bulls impacts them, though.Trades galore! None of them involve the Bulls!