Visionman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 28, 2017
- Posts:
- 7,995
- Liked Posts:
- 4,451
They aren't concerned with any injuries. Just brain injuries. And higher impact collisions tend to cause them more often...
They aren't concerned with any injuries. Just brain injuries. And higher impact collisions tend to cause them more often...
It was actually tougher to find than I originally thought it was. I can just say that anecdotally in my referee clinics/meetings special emphasis is placed upon watching out for safety fouls on special teams plays. As for which special teams plays they are talking about, I've always been under the assumption it's kickoffs and punts. On these plays a return man has a lot more open field to change direction, and that change of direction is where there is concern. You have a return man change direction, and the tackler moves with him not looking and gets decleated by a blocker - you're pretty much guaranteed to be looked at for a concussion.Thanks - I appreciate the response. Interesting stuff. It's a start, but nothing about kickoffs vs. other plays.
Yes so the owners and league don't get sued like they did 15 years down the line. But what sucks is they're changing the game - drastically. And they have been doing it year after year since Roger came into power.
When is enough? It's all about money. I get that. But damn, why change the whole game how it was meant to be played. The moving of the kickoffs really pissed me off 4 years ago.
And to come up with gimmick safety plays....with a punt...smh.
Players know the risks and should- KNOW possible injuries- playing a violent game. Maybe sign a waiver. shit. I'm not gonna watch millionaires play flag football. Next is two hand touch on the QB - no more sacks because the owners invest too much money in their QBs.
Bottom line this will set a precedent -that NFL will be soft because of greedy owners.
I don't understand why they don't just have the players sign a waiver eliminating the NFL from any liability in the event of head injuries. Sure they may lose a couple of players initially like the Borlands of the world, but I would guess most players would take the risk for generational wealth. I can think of several jobs that are much more dangerous and life threatening that get paid a fraction of what NFL players do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The idea is to make the game safer not just to protect profits. Players killing themselves with swiss cheese for brains is bad press and makes parents less likely to encourage their children to play. There is a trickle down effect they would like to avoid.I don't understand why they don't just have the players sign a waiver eliminating the NFL from any liability in the event of head injuries. Sure they may lose a couple of players initially like the Borlands of the world, but I would guess most players would take the risk for generational wealth. I can think of several jobs that are much more dangerous and life threatening that get paid a fraction of what NFL players do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Waivers only keep the lawsuits at a minimum. Teams can be sued regardless of any waiver that's been signed
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk