NFL top 100 rookie contributors (all speculation)

Burque

Huevos Rancheros
Joined:
Mar 11, 2015
Posts:
15,966
Liked Posts:
10,866
NFL.com saying we got four guys in the top 53 immediate contributors.

Whether it's cause we suck or we drafted really well is up for debate...

What are your thoughts?

After digesting this draft I think we did really really well and it will show on the field when we surprise people this season on both sides of the ball.




http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...cting-top-100-nfl-rookies-of-2016-players-120

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 

airtime143

This place is dead and buried.
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,964
Liked Posts:
16,606
NFL.com saying we got four guys in the top 53 immediate contributors.

Whether it's cause we suck or we drafted really well is up for debate...

What are your thoughts?

After digesting this draft I think we did really really well and it will show on the field when we surprise people this season on both sides of the ball.




http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...cting-top-100-nfl-rookies-of-2016-players-120

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

I am all for getting players that fit the defense they are building. the bears just didnt have them last year.
However, I have low expectations for the team overall. the offseason losses due to rebuild are enough to negate the additions, even if they all pan out as solid.
 

Burque

Huevos Rancheros
Joined:
Mar 11, 2015
Posts:
15,966
Liked Posts:
10,866
For the record:

Floyd @ six
Bullard @ thirty
Howard @ thirty nine
Whitehair @ fifty three.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 

Burque

Huevos Rancheros
Joined:
Mar 11, 2015
Posts:
15,966
Liked Posts:
10,866
I am all for getting players that fit the defense they are building. the bears just didnt have them last year.
However, I have low expectations for the team overall. the offseason losses due to rebuild are enough to negate the additions, even if they all pan out as solid.
I predicted (correctly) that we were a 6-10 team last year and I think we reverse that this year going 10-6 albeit against projected easier divisions. I would argue the AFC South is not going to be easy this year though.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: WCL

wazzupi

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 9, 2016
Posts:
4,393
Liked Posts:
1,621
I am all for getting players that fit the defense they are building. the bears just didnt have them last year.
However, I have low expectations for the team overall. the offseason losses due to rebuild are enough to negate the additions, even if they all pan out as solid.

So what did we lose exactly ??
 

Top