JZsportsfan
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,503
- Liked Posts:
- 674
- Location:
- Chicago
Wiggins definitely has it in the bag, but would still be great to see him finish #2
hate Nikola at the 3 it pretty much negates what he brings
don't want to hinder him by forcing him to play out of position
he has flourished at the 4 and has been pretty underwhelming at the 3
I disagree. Niko can play both positions. One of the main things he brings to the table is that he's a matchup problem for other teams. Imo, Niko should alternate between the PF and SF to create matchup problems for teams.
He should be a PF most of the time, I agree, to pull the bigs out with his shooting, but he can also go the SF and create a mismatch there based on the matchup, especially since we have Pau and Taj.
He should give Thib's the ability to make subs during the game to their advantage, imo.
It really depends on the defensive matchup imo. He can destroy SFs in the post, but many of them can kill him with their quickness. However, if he's playing against a slower SF, you could totally play him at SF without getting burned. Obviously the biggest advantage is for him to play PF, but in the right scenario, him at SF can be good also.he doesn't have the quickness to play SF
when thibs plays him there hes not been very good but when hes played PF hes been great...its like night & day
It really depends on the defensive matchup imo. He can destroy SFs in the post, but many of them can kill him with their quickness. However, if he's playing against a slower SF, you could totally play him at SF without getting burned. Obviously the biggest advantage is for him to play PF, but in the right scenario, him at SF can be good also.
Bird was also ridiculously smart and knew exactly where to put himself on defense. You don't get that many steals by luck.Exactly, that was pretty much my point about matchups as well. If you haven't figured it out yet, I hate generalizations. This totally eliminates the ability to strategise and gameplan. I'm also tired of hearing Niko can't play defense and is too slow. Larry Bird was pretty slow and last time I checked, he played SF pretty well. :dunno:
i think hes gotta go for Nikola's development
Taj is not really a 5 and Nikola is not a 3 so i don't see a spot
maybe we can still get a decent wing for him
Meanwhile, Wiggens stats are:
GP | MIN/G | PPG | REB/G | AST/G | FG % |
60 | 35.0 | 15.9 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 43.7 |
It really depends on the defensive matchup imo. He can destroy SFs in the post, but many of them can kill him with their quickness. However, if he's playing against a slower SF, you could totally play him at SF without getting burned. Obviously the biggest advantage is for him to play PF, but in the right scenario, him at SF can be good also.
I ain't saying absolutely keep Taj, I'm just saying if you had to keep Taj you could still use Mirotic. You don't necessarily have to punt Taj off the team either as there as still scenarios where they can be used together. That said, if you can swap Taj for a decent wing player and/or picks, you probably make that deal.my point is its not the ideal position for him and is not something i would force him to do just to keep Taj
I ain't saying absolutely keep Taj, I'm just saying if you had to keep Taj you could still use Mirotic. You don't necessarily have to punt Taj off the team either as there as still scenarios where they can be used together. That said, if you can swap Taj for a decent wing player and/or picks, you probably make that deal.
Because Niko is really a 4 and not a 3. He can occasionally play the 3 if the matchup is good, but it is not ideal. He is not a full time 3 unless you want him to get wrecked defensively almost every game.Pardon my ignorance, but if Niko really can be a 3, why not just keep Noah/Pau/Taj as your 4/5's...