- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 44,108
- Liked Posts:
- 53,401
CorrectI believe Flus is the one moving him to RG, no?
CorrectI believe Flus is the one moving him to RG, no?
I hope the best OT on Poles draft board is there at #9 so the Bears can shore up the OL and let Fields ball out this season.It's hard to tell. If Paris is gone at #9 but if Christian Gonzalez is there, it'd be tough to pass on him. We're still at a point where we need ballers at most any position.
There seems to be 4-5 solid C prospects and we should get one to compete with Cody for sure.So, Whitehair was the Bears C from 2016 to mid 2020 and only moved to LG because of an injury to Daniels and has over 4,000 NFL snaps, was a Pro Bowl alt in 2018 but somehow, he can't make a snap in shotgun? I also believe the Bears should draft a C but bring him in to compete with Whitehair for that spot.
Correct
But the rotating at RG made no fucking sense. Jenkins was the far superior player.I believe Flus is the one moving him to RG, no?
That's the thing. What if the best OT is on his board isn't rated as highly as Gonzalez (or someone else) and both are available? Do you still take the OT out of need or take the higher rated player?I hope the best OT on Poles draft board is there at #9 so the Bears can shore up the OL and let Fields ball out this season.
This is true, and the Bears are 0-3 in the last three, thanks for pointing that out!!
But the rotating at RG made no fucking sense. Jenkins was the far superior player.
That is something we as fans will never know unless we could get a peek at Poles draft board. Just my guess is Poles is going to do what is best for his franchise player, which means OT at #9, but that is just my opinion.That's the thing. What if the best OT is on his board isn't rated as highly as Gonzalez (or someone else) and both are available? Do you still take the OT out of need or take the higher rated player?
While i think Paris at #9 would be probably the best pick possible, i actually wouldn't be surprised one tiny bit if Poles doesn't think that a top 10 pick (or maybe even a first rounder) should be spent on an o-lineman. For one, we know he prides himself on finding gems later. Second, the outside zone scheme doesn't require super-studs to be effective as a unit. I woldn't be surprised at all if Poles grabs a D-lineman or even one of the cornerbacks considering the defense needs the help and we have Eberflus as the HC.That is something we as fans will never know unless we could get a peek at Poles draft board. Just my guess is Poles is going to do what is best for his franchise player, which means OT at #9, but that is just my opinion.
How do we know he prides himself on finding gems later on? Just because that's what he tried to do last year with limited draft picks?While i think Paris at #9 would be probably the best pick possible, i actually wouldn't be surprised one tiny bit if Poles doesn't think that a top 10 pick (or maybe even a first rounder) should be spent on an o-lineman. For one, we know he prides himself on finding gems later. Second, the outside zone scheme doesn't require super-studs to be effective as a unit. I woldn't be surprised at all if Poles grabs a D-lineman or even one of the cornerbacks considering the defense needs the help and we have Eberflus as the HC.
Why are dolphins and 49ers paying top money to their lt then? Some of the shit you guys talk yourselves into LOLWhile i think Paris at #9 would be probably the best pick possible, i actually wouldn't be surprised one tiny bit if Poles doesn't think that a top 10 pick (or maybe even a first rounder) should be spent on an o-lineman. For one, we know he prides himself on finding gems later. Second, the outside zone scheme doesn't require super-studs to be effective as a unit. I woldn't be surprised at all if Poles grabs a D-lineman or even one of the cornerbacks considering the defense needs the help and we have Eberflus as the HC.
Face it spanky, the Bears are Aaron Rodgers *****.All of it is true. Your welcome for correcting your dumb mistakes. Guess being 8-18 against Rodgers has you frazzled.
You add nothing to the Bears forum.Face it spanky, the Bears are Aaron Rodgers *****.
Face it spanky, the Bears are Aaron Rodgers *****.
You add nothing to the Bears forum.
Unfortunately, this is true. Should never be up for debate. And in the 1st 3years, the Bears were 2-3 against him. And then lost the NFCCG in January of 2011 to him. I think the next games he lost to the Bears were:Face it spanky, the Bears are Aaron Rodgers *****.
Fair point. I'm on board with Paris at #9, I just don't get the impression that Poles is necessarily thinking he needs to spend that pick on a tackle.Why are dolphins and 49ers paying top money to their lt then? Some of the shit you guys talk yourselves into LOL