- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 37,851
- Liked Posts:
- 36,622
Of course more Polian guys. Seems like there is a lot of player personnel guys. Are their any guys who specialize in college scouting who are on the list?
Big Dick Rick baby.
Of course more Polian guys. Seems like there is a lot of player personnel guys. Are their any guys who specialize in college scouting who are on the list?
This is a complete clown show. Interviewing like 30 people for this job when obvious candidates are sitting their ready to go. Why must they be “wow’d” in an interview? I can count on my hand the amount of times this type of hire has worked out.
They are not competent enough to see through bs, and the position is to detailed for someone with no experience since they will have no mentors to lean on in the building.
What is most likely to happen is they fall in love with some random again who is not ready, plus they will miss out on the top HC and have to settle on someone.
Me either. They are going about this the right way. It does not mean they are going to hire the right guy but there is absolutely nothing wrong with interviewing the amount of candidates they have on the list.I honestly have no idea why people are upset over talking to lots of candidates.
I really want to start a WHY HAVEN'T THE BEARS HIRED A GM YET???? thread on the main forum. Just to get the meatballs riled up.Me either. They are going about this the right way. It does not mean they are going to hire the right guy but there is absolutely nothing wrong with interviewing the amount of candidates they have on the list.
I honestly have no idea why people are upset over talking to lots of candidates.
That precious ballhe just likes ball
The more they talk to the better chance of them getting swindled again. See Emery, Trestman, Pace I could go on and on.
Stop hiring based on interviews, pick the best resume and move on.
Uh you really do need to interview people. Surely you realize this?
I mean if you're going to work with someone for years and pay them millions you have to spend a day or two getting to know them.
I get your point but I'd be concerned with George even if it were two candidates.
Yeah, there comes a point where interviewing too many guys becomes a problem and hinders your ability to hire a HC if other teams are poaching the best guys first.The more they talk to the better chance of them getting swindled again. See Emery, Trestman, Pace I could go on and on.
Stop hiring based on interviews, pick the best resume and move on.
OK who’s the man? I don’t see a Reid or Theo.no you need to talk to people and confirm what you think you know. Not sit back and wait for the best bullshit salesman to make themselves sound perfect.
Just once I’d like to see the Bears get the fucking man. Like when the Chiefs grabbed Andy Reid, no wide net needed, made it happen.
did the cubs need a wide net to find Theo?
Yeah, this isn't good news for Bears fans that want Harbaugh, but it also isn't out of the realm of possibility that Harbaugh may have told the guy he hired that he would be a part of his staff at the NFL if he ended up taking a job, and the guy was cool with that, too.This could be telling. I don't think its as telling as the other assistants flocking to Ohio State with Day.
However- you could make the case a coach wouldn't go to Michigan if they didn't know Harbaugh wasn't staying. Its just one position coach and Harbaugh may have told him he wasn't sure if he was staying yet or not...but I doubt it.
Please do.I really want to start a WHY HAVEN'T THE BEARS HIRED A GM YET???? thread on the main forum. Just to get the meatballs riled up.