Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
20,903
Liked Posts:
14,890
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
Field Yates of ESPN has a two round mock out. Here’s what he selected for Chicago.

“Round 1, Pick 10: Will Campbell, OL, LSU

Will Campbell falling to the Bears at No. 10 would be an ideal scenario. Despite the free agency moves to retool the entire interior offensive line, that shouldn't stop Chicago from continuing to build up the wall in front of quarterback Caleb Williams. Campbell is hailed as the best offensive lineman in this draft class, and he would be a massive get for the Bears.

I'm pretty bullish on Campbell as a prospect. Despite concerns about his 32⅝-inch arm length, he ranks fifth on my board. And in this scenario, I'm not super focused on whether he would ultimately play tackle or slide inside to guard. The Bears' starting five is already much better on paper after a busy free agency, and Campbell could play wherever he's needed.

New coach Ben Johnson would love a player like Campbell, whose elite foot quickness and pass protection ability fit great in his system. The Bears will likely feature plenty of zone rushing schemes in 2025.

Johnson recently discussed arm length when it comes to evaluating offensive linemen, and he said it's not a problem unless it becomes a problem. Which means perhaps the Bears believe Campbell could be their franchise left tackle.

Round 2, Pick 39 (from CAR): Emeka Egbuka, WR, Ohio State (First time I’ve seen this in a Bears’ mock)

Wide receiver isn't the most pressing need on the roster, but there's depth needed behind starters DJ Moore and Rome Odunze following Keenan Allen's departure in free agency. While receiver at No. 39 would come as a surprise, there's no denying Emeka Egbuka would be a big get as another weapon for quarterback Caleb Williams.

As the Bears look for one more playmaker to maximize Ben Johnson's offense, they could turn to the ever-reliable Egbuka in Round 2. He set the Ohio State record for catches (205) and is a great route runner.

Johnson discussed the importance of the slot receiver in his offense, and Egbuka would be a perfect fit. While the team did sign Olamide Zaccheaus in free agency, Egbuka could be a long-term answer to pair with Moore and Odunze.

Round 2, Pick 41: Quinshon Judkins, RB, Ohio State

While many have linked the Bears to Boise State's Ashton Jeanty at 10th overall, he could very well be off the board at that point (or Chicago could elect to go another direction, in this case with Will Campbell).

But this is a deep running back group with some playmakers on Day 2, including Ohio State's Quinshon Judkins, who could thrive in Ben Johnson's offense.

More offense for the Bears, two picks after I had them taking Emeka Egbuka. I have an ever-so-slightly higher grade on Judkins' fellow Ohio State back TreVeyon Henderson, but Judkins can bring a better profile of power and thump to a Chicago offense that could use it. He scored 45 career rushing TDs.

The Bears have indicated that they're looking to add to the running back room this offseason, and Judkins would be a great addition alongside D'Andre Swift.”

love the Egbuka/Judkins picks
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,348
Liked Posts:
11,877
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
I dont really think that's a weight he prefers, they are just emphasizing bookers need to add bulk. Booker got thrown around like a rag doll in the run game last year. I'd guess he played more around 240. I'd like to see him get up around 265 so he can hold the POA and see if he still has any pass rush explosion
Yeah i know Allen prefers the typical 4-3 DE at 265+ but i'm saying if they like a guy like Mike Green or James Pearce or Donovan Ezeiruaku type that will play somewhere around that 250 mark then it would really open up the guys we can target at DE.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,348
Liked Posts:
11,877
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Field Yates of ESPN has a two round mock out. Here’s what he selected for Chicago.

“Round 1, Pick 10: Will Campbell, OL, LSU

Will Campbell falling to the Bears at No. 10 would be an ideal scenario. Despite the free agency moves to retool the entire interior offensive line, that shouldn't stop Chicago from continuing to build up the wall in front of quarterback Caleb Williams. Campbell is hailed as the best offensive lineman in this draft class, and he would be a massive get for the Bears.

I'm pretty bullish on Campbell as a prospect. Despite concerns about his 32⅝-inch arm length, he ranks fifth on my board. And in this scenario, I'm not super focused on whether he would ultimately play tackle or slide inside to guard. The Bears' starting five is already much better on paper after a busy free agency, and Campbell could play wherever he's needed.

New coach Ben Johnson would love a player like Campbell, whose elite foot quickness and pass protection ability fit great in his system. The Bears will likely feature plenty of zone rushing schemes in 2025.

Johnson recently discussed arm length when it comes to evaluating offensive linemen, and he said it's not a problem unless it becomes a problem. Which means perhaps the Bears believe Campbell could be their franchise left tackle.

Round 2, Pick 39 (from CAR): Emeka Egbuka, WR, Ohio State (First time I’ve seen this in a Bears’ mock)

Wide receiver isn't the most pressing need on the roster, but there's depth needed behind starters DJ Moore and Rome Odunze following Keenan Allen's departure in free agency. While receiver at No. 39 would come as a surprise, there's no denying Emeka Egbuka would be a big get as another weapon for quarterback Caleb Williams.

As the Bears look for one more playmaker to maximize Ben Johnson's offense, they could turn to the ever-reliable Egbuka in Round 2. He set the Ohio State record for catches (205) and is a great route runner.

Johnson discussed the importance of the slot receiver in his offense, and Egbuka would be a perfect fit. While the team did sign Olamide Zaccheaus in free agency, Egbuka could be a long-term answer to pair with Moore and Odunze.

Round 2, Pick 41: Quinshon Judkins, RB, Ohio State

While many have linked the Bears to Boise State's Ashton Jeanty at 10th overall, he could very well be off the board at that point (or Chicago could elect to go another direction, in this case with Will Campbell).

But this is a deep running back group with some playmakers on Day 2, including Ohio State's Quinshon Judkins, who could thrive in Ben Johnson's offense.

More offense for the Bears, two picks after I had them taking Emeka Egbuka. I have an ever-so-slightly higher grade on Judkins' fellow Ohio State back TreVeyon Henderson, but Judkins can bring a better profile of power and thump to a Chicago offense that could use it. He scored 45 career rushing TDs.

The Bears have indicated that they're looking to add to the running back room this offseason, and Judkins would be a great addition alongside D'Andre Swift.”

But @msadows said he doesn't even have good foot speed let alone elite foot speed.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,348
Liked Posts:
11,877
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
I do too. I really hadn’t considered Egbuka at 39. He would be a great fit with DJ and Rome.
Can't see him falling out of the 1st round but i feel like i've said that about so many players now that there's bound to a 1 or 3 of them that do. I just saw a mock that had Kenneth Grant falling to pick #34. I'm against trading up in this draft but if Grant was sitting there at #34 then i'm making that call to see what they want to move up from pick #39.
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,428
Liked Posts:
21,523
Yeah i know Allen prefers the typical 4-3 DE at 265+ but i'm saying if they like a guy like Mike Green or James Pearce or Donovan Ezeiruaku type that will play somewhere around that 250 mark then it would really open up the guys we can target at DE.
I really would love those guys and hope I'm wrong but I don't think the Bears will take any of them
 

bears51/40

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
5,277
Liked Posts:
4,270
Who is that pure LT? This draft sucks for tackles, it's s really weak position group. I really want a LT myself, but not at the opportunity cost of Grant or Green for a group of guys that don't project to be impact players at LT, if they can even stick.
Disagree...............Campbell, Banks, Conerly are all first round LTs.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,679
Liked Posts:
10,485
Disagree...............Campbell, Banks, Conerly are all first round LTs.
How is Campbell even a LT, yet alone worthy of being taken in the 1st round. Please name 1 elite NFL LT with his arm length and wingspan measurements. Just one….
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,679
Liked Posts:
10,485
Interesting, so Campbell's arms are 33" and hit pro standard,

And what about his wingspan? Hint: It’s 5 inches shorter than the mean NFL OT wingspan. I have no idea why people are just focusing on his arm length yet completely ignoring his 77 inch wingspan.
 

bears51/40

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
5,277
Liked Posts:
4,270
And what about his wingspan? Hint: It’s 5 inches shorter than the mean NFL OT wingspan. I have no idea why people are just focusing on his arm length yet completely ignoring his 77 inch wingspan.
Don't know what his wingspan was at his pro day, but it seems combine measurements were screwed up this year. That being said. Andrew Whitworth who was a 16-year NFL LT was asked about offensive linemen and length. He said for guys with shorter arms, it's more about quick feet, solid base, and technique. Campbell has all those traits and more.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,218
Liked Posts:
36,534
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
I'll be honest, I don't think I'd have the stones to make a good pick at #10.
 

pseudonym

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jan 11, 2014
Posts:
7,185
Liked Posts:
4,552
Location:
Chicago
I don't see them taking a WR in the first two rounds. He'd be pretty far down the target list after RB1/Swift, DJM, Odunze, TE1/Kmet so target #5 at BEST.
 

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
20,903
Liked Posts:
14,890
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
I don't see them taking a WR in the first two rounds. He'd be pretty far down the target list after RB1/Swift, DJM, Odunze, TE1/Kmet so target #5 at BEST.
i get the sentiment, but the reality is we have 2 WR's that are very good, then 1 vet that is mediocre at best on a short term deal, and then a bunch of bums

investing a rookie contract(im sure you see what WR's are getting in FA lately) into a young #3 WR that can emerge to become more than that in a pass happy NFL is a valuable resource to have.

not to mention if god forbid something happens to moore or rome or both of them. then what? what appears to be a somewhat strength of the roster can turn south pretty quick
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,428
Liked Posts:
21,523
Don't know what his wingspan was at his pro day, but it seems combine measurements were screwed up this year. That being said. Andrew Whitworth who was a 16-year NFL LT was asked about offensive linemen and length. He said for guys with shorter arms, it's more about quick feet, solid base, and technique. Campbell has all those traits and more.
You can't really mess up measuring wingspan. Pretty certain that stayed the same or was real close which still leaves it incredibly short.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,218
Liked Posts:
36,534
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Feels like a guy kc or Philly will take late if he really falls to them in 1. It also feels like Philly might do some serious dirty work trashing really good players anonymously to get them at their pick annually.



I'd much prefer burch or almost any of the 2nd/3rd round edges to mykel/shemar. I can't imagine burch going before the Bears pick at 39 either. The edge I really want is green because he's probably the best pass rusher in the draft but the bears will never take him
Lane Zerlein comps Burch to Dayo.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,679
Liked Posts:
10,485
Don't know what his wingspan was at his pro day, but it seems combine measurements were screwed up this year. That being said. Andrew Whitworth who was a 16-year NFL LT was asked about offensive linemen and length. He said for guys with shorter arms, it's more about quick feet, solid base, and technique. Campbell has all those traits and more.

Could you or Andrew whitworth name an elite LT with a 77 inch wingspan and 32 5/8 - 33 inch arms? People can discredit the measurements if they want, but you should be able to point to examples in the NFL.

Seems like betting on a guy at 10 to overcome those physical limitations, a wonky stance, and a 72 PFF grade in college to turn into a cornerstone LT in the NFL is an awful bet to make. Said it before but he’s an inferior Peter Skoronski, and Skoronski is currently struggling at OG. I’d wager the titans are regretting their decision because that’s awful value.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,348
Liked Posts:
11,877
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
I really would love those guys and hope I'm wrong but I don't think the Bears will take any of them
Yeah, might be looking more at one of the Ohio St boyz, (JTT or Sawyer) who are more of the traditional 4-3 DE size than the other 3 mentioned.
 

Top