Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,775
Liked Posts:
19,746
The bears have a lot of good young players at many positions.

You dont replace developing players you just drafted a few years ago. Only morons dont understand it takes time to develop draft picks.

Dexter is certainly one of those players. He has a very high upside, most DT's take 3-4 years to breakout.
Well, this moron certainly understands it as I’ve stated it many times. My point is that somehow Bears fans don’t want to draft any position at which we already have a player on the roster and that kind of makes it hard doesn’t it?
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,598
Liked Posts:
3,444
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Sad times... I like him. If they're hell bent on a top end RB prospect, I'm ok seeing what falls to 39/41. There should be one of Judkins, Skat, and Johnson there. I like all of them. I like guys in the 3rd too.

My gut though is that Ben will want to get a ~top 5 type of back though given his emphasis on the run game. So that said, I feel like they won't gamble on waiting to see what's there in the 3rd.
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
12,132
Liked Posts:
13,324
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
Not knowing a lot about the Saints, they lined up in the A gap about half the time the Bears did with the NT/1T. I checked 2023 too considering Billings injury. Based on that, my guess is Billings' snaps will drop some. The Saints generally seemed to favor using two 3Ts unless it was a clearer running situation.

I went back to 2021 and not one of the top 3 DTs in snaps even exceeded 300 lbs.
View attachment 44966
Billings isn't really a big, clogging nose though.

His snaps will certainly drop, he was playing way too much last year.
 

Katesboobsrgr8

Active member
Joined:
Mar 23, 2016
Posts:
117
Liked Posts:
134
I'm feeling like Jalon Walker might be the guy who drops this year. If he does, he's the obvious choice at 10, isn't he?
 

thenewguy

Well-known member
Joined:
Nov 28, 2012
Posts:
1,441
Liked Posts:
2,026
Billings is 30 for the entire NFL season next year, and he costs $3,3m. Unless he gets injured or is still injured there's no reason not to keep him. He was the best DL on the team last year imo and they really collapsed after he got hurt. He was also playing too many snaps, and that shouldn't be as big an issue this year.
Yeah, no reason to get rid of Billings. He's a tremendous value. It really is a great time to get an interior DL and let them learn from Jarret and Billings. Those two may only have a couple of years in the tank and hopefully they can help develop some young players and reduce their snaps in the process.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,598
Liked Posts:
3,444
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Billings isn't really a big, clogging nose though.

His snaps will certainly drop, he was playing way too much last year.
No, he isn't the large 330 lb NT, but just his style as a 1T seems like it's not exactly how Allen does it. But who knows... maybe Allen sees this piece and decides to tweak things to utilize a guy who was a high performer. I'm just speculating based on what I could gather from NO's past seasons. A lot of embedded assumptions on my part.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,775
Liked Posts:
19,746
And you draft a guy when he falls because character is no better or worse of a way to predict whether or not or guy will be a bust.

You can have the Tim Tebow of leadership character and hard work and he can still be awful as a football player and bust out of the league.
You don’t draft a player lacking NFL talent because he has high character but you may want to pass on a player possessing NFL talent due to character concerns.
 

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,598
Liked Posts:
3,444
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I'm feeling like Jalon Walker might be the guy who drops this year. If he does, he's the obvious choice at 10, isn't he?
I believe DA would love him in the way he runs all these different fronts. At the moment, he has done a lot of damage from the nickel (Gordon is going to be dangerous this year). He also likes to bring LBs to the LOS and stand up his edges a lot. I think all of these things make it so a versatile guy like Walker would be an absolute weapon for him.

 

HearshotKDS

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 9, 2012
Posts:
7,750
Liked Posts:
7,949
Location:
Lake Forest
And big fatties that will, or should, be around in the early 2nd that you like if we aren't able to get Grant? T.Williams, A.Collins, O.Norman Lott, D.Walker, J.Phillips?
Collins has really grown on me, I think his ceiling is a really solid NT but not a star or significant pass rush threat. But think he will be a really good space clogging tarpit in the NFL that run games basically just have to avoid. Deone Walker is a no for me due to back issues, I like Lott, and havent watched a ton of Williams or Phillips.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,347
Liked Posts:
11,876
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Collins has really grown on me, I think his ceiling is a really solid NT but not a star or significant pass rush threat. But think he will be a really good space clogging tarpit in the NFL that run games basically just have to avoid. Deone Walker is a no for me due to back issues, I like Lott, and havent watched a ton of Williams or Phillips.
Good stuff but i think D.Walker could end up the gem out of all the players listed if he holds up health wise. I think he can be that big fatty that can stop the run and get to the passer. Big question though when it comes to back issues.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,637
Liked Posts:
2,990
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Chris Jones #37
Justin Madubuike #71
Quinnen Williams #3
Jalen Carter #9
Justin Simmons #19
Dexter Lawrence #17
Vita Vea #12
Daron Payne #13
Kenny Clarke #27
Javon Hargrave #89

Please stop cherry picking only the highest drafted players at the position. Even when you try the majority still fall outside of the top 10.

It's not difficult to find a good DT in the draft, and MOST are not top 10 picks meaning that unless the Bears are really good they can find another DT somewhere during the mid first round where they will be picking


@SugarWalls @bamainatlanta etc
 

bears51/40

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
5,277
Liked Posts:
4,270
Philly has a rotation, Jalen Carter played 79% of the snaps and 3 other DTs below 50%.
Dexter played 57% of the snaps and they also added Grady Jarrett who played 67% of snaps for Atlanta...
Do you think Dexter will want even less snaps or that the Bears are paying Jarret to play less than 50% of the snaps?

So how do they fit in a #10 pick that will also be in need of at least 50% of the snaps, plus Andrew Billings?
Dexter looks like he is about 285 right now, could be the plan is to use him in a rotation as a base DE and slide him inside as a rush DT.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,637
Liked Posts:
2,990
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
You can't possibly be this wrong. The Eagles had just drafted Jordan Davis and had an elder statesman in Fletcher Cox and drafted Jalen Carter to play around 30 to 40 percent of the snaps behind those two. You draft high level talent regardless of your depth. Especially with Grady Jarrett being long in the tooth. You want a player like Nolen to learn behind a long established pro who is also a known leader.
The Eagles were already a playoff team loaded with talent, they could afford to draft for depth. They had players like Cox and Graham who had one foot out of the door already so of course they were looking to replace them.

Jordan Davis is not a 3T that would need to share snaps with Carter who was a former teammate.

Keep trying.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,637
Liked Posts:
2,990
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
You realize this invalidates your argument right?

You said “DT position is an easy to scout” and then implied it would be really easy to find a DT anywhere in the draft next season.

What would being selected in the top 10 matter then?

DT is a ridiculously hard position to scout. I’m starting to wonder if your a brilliant parody account

I confess you caught me, my alt is @bamainalabama..
 

bears51/40

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
5,277
Liked Posts:
4,270
IMO, the way the draft appears to be shaping up, I just don't see any trench guys worth taking at 10 but they may take a couple on day 2 though.
Aside from possibly CB, I expect some sort of offensive chess piece for Ben at 10. It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out.
Considering Ben Johnson is the HC you very well could be right. Bears would still need a LT on day two at 39'41, or 72. who could you see the Bears taking in that range?
 

Top