Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,775
Liked Posts:
19,746
It's throw shit at the wall week.
Yeah, in the homestretch after everything has been said 100 times these guys have to come up with something new. Earlier someone suggested a writer should be fired for his crazy take but in fact that’s exactly what they’re being paid for.

While it is true, that fans will continue to regurgitate the same things over and over on a fan for him as we are doing here and I’m sure others are doing elsewhere, writers have to just throw shit at the wall as you said just to get somebody to read it.

The draft can’t come soon enough.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,429
Liked Posts:
55,026
Of course one will but which one? Then again Kiran could be all that in a year or so as well. Biggest problem for the Bear right now is the ? at LT this year but even top rookies often struggle at LT early in the NFL.

Agreed. This is one of the reasons I want to start now.
 

Washington

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 22, 2016
Posts:
4,137
Liked Posts:
3,222
Murray looked good in his short stint and Bates is solid... if he can play.

Are you talking about the same Bates who missed all of last year because he's riddled with arthritis? I am not sure Bates is solid. Buffalo revamped their OL last year and chose not to keep him even though he was cheap. They obviously knew something Poles did not.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
1,002
Liked Posts:
669
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Consciously or not I guarantee you this has affected the discussion this year. It was a big talking point this year.

As far as noticing the Bears RB room…. I am 100% on board with drafting RBs and agree it needs help. I would be fine adding two RB’s actually. My only issue has ever been with round 1 for one.
I've been projecting 2 for a while but this draft has so many that UDFA is a viable option for #2. We also still have Wheeler that showed genuine potential before the ding last year.
 
Last edited:

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,425
Liked Posts:
21,515
Consciously or not I guarantee you this has affected the discussion this year. It was a big talking point this year.

As far as noticing the Bears RB room…. I am 100% on board with drafting RBs and agree it needs help. I would be fine adding two RB’s actually. My only issue has ever been with round 1 for one.
It has definitely changed the conversation. Running games were glaringly important this year. If KC had any running game at all, maybe they have a chance in the SB and mahomes isn't getting killed.

I agree on two rbs if they take someone like judkins/johnson/Martinez, I'd really like to supplement that with a later round back like blue. But I also have a strong dislike for Swifts game.

As far as round 1, I just want the most impactful player on the board and I do think that could be jeanty if he were available. If they followed that up with ersery/savaiinaea, jtt/burch/swinson, west/caldwell/norman-lott or some similar combination of players, I'd be ecstatic.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,429
Liked Posts:
55,026
Yeah, in the homestretch after everything has been said 100 times these guys have to come up with something new. Earlier someone suggested a writer should be fired for his crazy take but in fact that’s exactly what they’re being paid for.

While it is true, that fans will continue to regurgitate the same things over and over on a fan for him as we are doing here and I’m sure others are doing elsewhere, writers have to just throw shit at the wall as you said just to get somebody to read it.

The draft can’t come soon enough.


Guys…… what if we traded all our picks this year for picks next year when the draft is (per sources) LOADED? Then we tank this year and have a Super Draft next year? Caleb can take the year off and work on his footwork with big BJ. Bagent can start and when we lose him to free agency we get a comp pick!!

I’ll hang up and listen….
 
  • Haha
Reactions: chi

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,429
Liked Posts:
55,026
I've been project 2 for a while but this draft has so many that UDFA is a viable option for #2. We also still have Wheeler that showed genuine potential before the ding last year.

Was thinking one of those 7ths may actually be useful for once
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,677
Liked Posts:
10,481
The Bears currently have a starter rehabbing from major surgery and a third round pick with one start.

I’m aware. It’s not an ideal situation, and they’ll need to add an OT at some point, but I don’t think you over draft a lesser player just because you’re concerned your starter might miss a couple of games. The Bears also have a lot more info on Braxtons injury too….if they’re really concerned about it or the rehab isn’t going well, thats definitely a factor….but if you expect him to fully bounce back, he’s going to beat out all these guys being talked about.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,710
Liked Posts:
23,671
I’m aware. It’s not an ideal situation, and they’ll need to add an OT at some point, but I don’t think you over draft a lesser player just because you’re concerned your starter might miss a couple of games. The Bears also have a lot more info on Braxtons injury too….if they’re really concerned about it or the rehab isn’t going well, thats definitely a factor….but if you expect him to fully bounce back, he’s going to beat out all these guys being talked about.

More than likely, but guys like remy want out left tackle to suck for a year so we get the growing paints out of a #10 pick. lol

Absolute bonkers thought but hey, I'm here for the stupidity. I'm mostly okay with taking a tackle at #10 because braxton is going to make crazy money if he plays the same as he has the last few years.

Personally my ideal scenario is to take a DE or jalon walker at #10, then trade up w/ 41 or 39 and pair it with 72 to get into the mid 20's and draft simmons. Let simmons redshirt a bit behind braxton and start in 2026.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,429
Liked Posts:
55,026
I’m aware. It’s not an ideal situation, and they’ll need to add an OT at some point, but I don’t think you over draft a lesser player just because you’re concerned your starter might miss a couple of games. The Bears also have a lot more info on Braxtons injury too….if they’re really concerned about it or the rehab isn’t going well, thats definitely a factor….but if you expect him to fully bounce back, he’s going to beat out all these guys being talked about.

What about 2,3,4 years from now? Who will be better? Does that figure into your decision making? That’s what I care about. I want long term solutions

If Braxton starts next year while they develop someone I am fine with it. Competition also makes everyone better and the Bears never have legit competition
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
1,002
Liked Posts:
669
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Are you talking about the same Bates who missed all of last year because he's riddled with arthritis? I am not sure Bates is solid. Buffalo revamped their OL last year and chose not to keep him even though he was cheap. They obviously knew something Poles did not.
Did you miss the qualifier (...if he can play)?

He said he's good after the stem cell treatment but we all have doubts. Point was that I don't think the Bear use a pick in the 1st 2 days at G. We don't know what Bates or the Bear do and that would change a perspective. We're not talking about him being the starter he was projected to be when traded. He missed the end of the season with a concussion, not the shoulder and even though it was an real issue last year, it's reportedly better. We'll see.

Murray had an 82 PFF grade before tearing his pec. Small but VG sample and he was planting guys.
 

didshereallysaythat

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2011
Posts:
21,494
Liked Posts:
10,222
They need to just take the best overall player at 10. You never know what will develop into a need in a few years. Ideally, it will be at a premier position.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,710
Liked Posts:
23,671
Did you miss the qualifier (...if he can play)?

He said he's good after the stem cell treatment but we all have doubts. Point was that I don't think the Bear use a pick in the 1st 2 days at G. We don't know what Bates or the Bear do and that would change a perspective. We're not talking about him being the starter he was projected to be when traded. He missed the end of the season with a concussion, not the shoulder and even though it was an real issue last year, it's reportedly better. We'll see.

Murray had an 82 PFF grade before tearing his pec. Small but VG sample and he was planting guys.

Lol PFF grade.
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,336
Liked Posts:
17,928
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
More than likely, but guys like remy want out left tackle to suck for a year so we get the growing paints out of a #10 pick. lol

Absolute bonkers thought but hey, I'm here for the stupidity. I'm mostly okay with taking a tackle at #10 because braxton is going to make crazy money if he plays the same as he has the last few years.

Personally my ideal scenario is to take a DE or jalon walker at #10, then trade up w/ 41 or 39 and pair it with 72 to get into the mid 20's and draft simmons. Let simmons redshirt a bit behind braxton and start in 2026.

Your ideal scenario is drafting another pre-injured guy? Nice!
 

Top