Katesboobsrgr8
Active member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 118
- Liked Posts:
- 134
Exactly. People are overlooking that having more tackles than you need would be a good problem to have. I'm not saying you just hoard all the tackles in the league, but Braxton and Kiran both carry big question marks right now. The lesser evil is to get a new one, that you're more confident will become a long term starter and then you have expendable depth that can be traded or at least become good comp picks. What the Bears can't have is two terrible LTs leaving a gaping hole on a young QB's blindside.
I agree. Unfortunately there isn't a clear answer in this draft, just more question marks. If there were obvious answers we wouldn't have the opportunity to draft them at 10 anyway. I suppose the probability on hitting on one of three question marks is higher than one of two, but it also comes with the risk of a wasted first round pick.
That said, if our scouting believes Banks is the guy I will defer to their judgement. Poles runs these as a collaborative effort, and by all accounts we have some damn good football minds on our team. If they collectively agree that Banks is the top available player to sustain improvement, then I will reserve judgement until he shows what he is in the league.