Nelly
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 13, 2018
- Posts:
- 7,893
- Liked Posts:
- 9,305
We know Henderson can block with the best of them and we know he's a homerun threat wherever he is on the field. He's not the rushing talent that Jeanty is but for that 2nd round pick, or a minor trade-up to ensure you get him? Much, much, much better value than even taking Jeanty at #10 let alone basically trading what could be Henderson + #10 for Jeanty. If Johnson is the offensive guru he's claimed to be then he could do wonders with Henderson and Swift who are both threats to house it if they get the ball in space. We shouldn't need to have to spend a top 10 pick on a running back with a coach like that.Yea, for me personally, not to give a super longwinded answer:
- I do think Jeanty is special and the best RB in the class. I would bet against the Bears picking a better RB in this class at 39 or later.
- I know Ben can still make a number of RBs look really good if the line is functional, so I don't see a need to be desperate.
- RBs general shelf life is a concern for a top 10 pick. A starting OT can last a decade. Any RB that gets that far is definitely an exception. This leads into the positional value stuff too.
- Throwing premium draft picks (2nd rounders) into this just kills me even more.
- RBs are cheaper to obtain otherwise... trades, free agency, etc. Premium QBs, OTs, Edges, DTs more rarely become available.
- If the Bears got Jeanty, I would be excited to watch him. It's not about that.