Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans ONLY - Ozzy - Best draft value for Bears

modo

Based
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
30,278
Liked Posts:
25,063
Location:
USA
People continue to overlook this. That wingspan is awful and he would be a complete outlier at the position. The mean OT wingspan is 82.1 inches. That is a huge discrepancy. Dude is not an NFL LT
Yes. Its not just his arms....his whole freaking width is off by 5 inches....its crazy.....DEs will bend around him at the pro level.
 

SugarWalls

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 17, 2013
Posts:
7,764
Liked Posts:
7,551
I will be surprised if one of the first four picks isn’t a trade down. You don’t have to move down far on one of the 2nds or 3rd to get a day three pick
That sounds good to me but hasn’t poles traded up in the draft or am I misremembering?

I know he tried to trade up to get Rome (lol). I think he traded up to ensure they got Stevenson or maybe Dexter (also lol) ???
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,800
Liked Posts:
10,599
That sounds good to me but hasn’t poles traded up in the draft or am I misremembering?

I know he tried to trade up to get Rome (lol). I think he traded up to ensure they got Stevenson or maybe Dexter (also lol) ???

I don’t think he ever “tried” to trade up for Rome, but he contemplated it. Don’t believe an offer was ever made.

He did trade up a few spots for Stevenson. Historically, he prefers to trade down
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,635
Liked Posts:
12,065
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Name one even decent LT with as short of a wingspan. They don’t exist. Campbell going to be the first player to overcome that?

Hell, his wingspan is worse than Skoronski and titans had to play Skoronski at OG….and it’s not like he played well there either. I actually think Skoronski was better at LT than Campbell too. Either way, Campbell is one of the most overrated prospects this draft right now. He will have to learn how to play guard and will struggle because of his stance
The Titans didn't have to play Skoronski at G, the drafted him to play G and drafted JC Latham to play LT the following year.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,635
Liked Posts:
12,065
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
I think arm length is a big barrier for guys that lack athleticism and sound fundamentals. Imo an OTs feet and hands are more important and guys who struggle there have no chance to overcome short arms. Campbell's tape against elite opponents generally shows he's got great feet and hands. I understand the concerns, I just disagree that he can't succeed at OT.
Also has the power needed and great recovery.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,635
Liked Posts:
12,065
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
I like him as a possibility for the Bears, so I hope he’s alright. Honestly, I don’t need to see those big dudes running 40s. If you’re Darnold, it’ll help to see. Anyone else… don’t hurt yourself.
Yeah the big guys should just do a 10 yard split which is much more meaningful for them then the 40 is.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
1,193
Liked Posts:
795
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
He's 195 soaking wet on a good day with a lean frame. Like the player but he's a platoon player in the league,

This class is overhyped in my assessment of these backs.one of the best ever, nonsense. The quantity is certainly there but not the quality. Alot of these guys have warts.
He's 206+, LOL. He averaged .340 Missed Tackles per Carry when he last played in 2023, which ranks 7th among draft-eligible RBs and looked better in very short play time in 2024. Ran a 4.41 40 with 41.5 vertical and 17 reps at his Pro Day. Pff has him up to #144 overall in this draft from being projected as an UDFA just weeks ago. I've been saying that if he's there in 5, #148, the Bear should take him.
 
Last edited:

Wild_x_Card

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,047
Liked Posts:
13,352
He's 206+, LOL. He averaged .340 Missed Tackles per Carry when he last played in 2023, which ranks 7th among draft-eligible RBs and looked better in very short play time in 2024. Ran a 4.45 40 with 41.5 vertical and 17 reps at his Pro Day. Pff has him up to #144 overall in this draft from being projected as an UDFA just weeks ago. I've been saying that if he's there in 5, #148, the Bear should take him.
Official weight....Screenshot_2025-03-26-14-56-05-87_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

Again, I like the player, I think he can one productive in the league, the buring question is can his body hold up. He runs hard, no doubt. His durability will be a concern for teams. Because of his frame.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
1,193
Liked Posts:
795
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Official weight....View attachment 44593

Again, I like the player, I think he can one productive in the league, the buring question is can his body hold up. He runs hard, no doubt. His durability will be a concern for teams. Because of his frame.
He was 206 at his pro Day last week when he jumped that 41.5 vert and 10.5 broad jump.. He wasn't invited to the combine so your link is a guess. I've also seen him listed at 208.

Here's his current genuinely official #s.

 
Last edited:

Wild_x_Card

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
14,047
Liked Posts:
13,352
He was 206 at his pro Day last week when he jumped that 41.5. He wasn't invited to the combine so your link is a guess. I've also seen him listed at 208.
Wasn't invited to the combine? He ran a 4.39 40...at the combine. I feel like we're talking about two different players here lol
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,646
Liked Posts:
21,941
Official weight....View attachment 44593

Again, I like the player, I think he can one productive in the league, the buring question is can his body hold up. He runs hard, no doubt. His durability will be a concern for teams. Because of his frame.

He was 206 at his pro Day last week when he jumped that 41.5. He wasn't invited to the combine so your link is a guess. I've also seen him listed at 208.
You guys are talking about 2 different players.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
1,193
Liked Posts:
795
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Well I only ever spoke about one. I should have taken a look at your link,
 

Top