Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
986
Liked Posts:
661
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
So you don’t think any of these tackles will have better careers than Braxton or Kiran? Guess we shall see in a few years.

I do trust Roushar at least.
Of course one will but which one? Then again Kiran could be all that in a year or so as well. Biggest problem for the Bear right now is the ? at LT this year but even top rookies often struggle at LT early in the NFL.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,704
Liked Posts:
23,663
Oladejo is DL at 72.



I dont think this is 100% accurate. Barkley, Henry, lions and Buffalo run games (great rbs & OLs [outside of baltimores]) may have swayed people some but people also notice the bears rb room is fucking awful. Fortunately if they did go rb in 1 there is quite a few OL (& DL) they could take in rd 2 & 3 with those 3 picks that could contribute and develop as well.

I think swift is dookie, but if you put swift/roschon as a starting duo behind this OL(Healthy) they should be much much better

Shit, you take last years starting OL and give them actual coaching and a real blocking scheme and the run game would already look better.

It's hard to judge anyone off the shitshow that was the 2024 bears offense.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
986
Liked Posts:
661
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
We absolutely can't rely on either but if you want to thats cool

Bates has played 140 snaps the last two years combined and Bill Murray is a random guy off the street who's played 42 snaps
So relying on a Backup rookie is err, reliable? How early do want to draft a backup vs a contributor? They'll take developmental OL somewhere.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,405
Liked Posts:
54,980
Oladejo is DL at 72.



I dont think this is 100% accurate. Barkley, Henry, lions and Buffalo run games (great rbs & OLs [outside of baltimores]) may have swayed people some but people also notice the bears rb room is fucking awful. Fortunately if they did go rb in 1 there is quite a few OL (& DL) they could take in rd 2 & 3 with those 3 picks that could contribute and develop as well.


Consciously or not I guarantee you this has affected the discussion this year. It was a big talking point this year.

As far as noticing the Bears RB room…. I am 100% on board with drafting RBs and agree it needs help. I would be fine adding two RB’s actually. My only issue has ever been with round 1 for one.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
35,775
Liked Posts:
19,742
It's throw shit at the wall week.
Yeah, in the homestretch after everything has been said 100 times these guys have to come up with something new. Earlier someone suggested a writer should be fired for his crazy take but in fact that’s exactly what they’re being paid for.

While it is true, that fans will continue to regurgitate the same things over and over on a fan for him as we are doing here and I’m sure others are doing elsewhere, writers have to just throw shit at the wall as you said just to get somebody to read it.

The draft can’t come soon enough.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,405
Liked Posts:
54,980
Of course one will but which one? Then again Kiran could be all that in a year or so as well. Biggest problem for the Bear right now is the ? at LT this year but even top rookies often struggle at LT early in the NFL.

Agreed. This is one of the reasons I want to start now.
 

Washington

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 22, 2016
Posts:
4,132
Liked Posts:
3,215
Murray looked good in his short stint and Bates is solid... if he can play.

Are you talking about the same Bates who missed all of last year because he's riddled with arthritis? I am not sure Bates is solid. Buffalo revamped their OL last year and chose not to keep him even though he was cheap. They obviously knew something Poles did not.
 

--CyBear--

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 6, 2025
Posts:
986
Liked Posts:
661
Location:
Hoffman Estates
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Consciously or not I guarantee you this has affected the discussion this year. It was a big talking point this year.

As far as noticing the Bears RB room…. I am 100% on board with drafting RBs and agree it needs help. I would be fine adding two RB’s actually. My only issue has ever been with round 1 for one.
I've been projecting 2 for a while but this draft has so many that UDFA is a viable option for #2. We also still have Wheeler that showed genuine potential before the ding last year.
 
Last edited:

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
16,393
Liked Posts:
21,452
Consciously or not I guarantee you this has affected the discussion this year. It was a big talking point this year.

As far as noticing the Bears RB room…. I am 100% on board with drafting RBs and agree it needs help. I would be fine adding two RB’s actually. My only issue has ever been with round 1 for one.
It has definitely changed the conversation. Running games were glaringly important this year. If KC had any running game at all, maybe they have a chance in the SB and mahomes isn't getting killed.

I agree on two rbs if they take someone like judkins/johnson/Martinez, I'd really like to supplement that with a later round back like blue. But I also have a strong dislike for Swifts game.

As far as round 1, I just want the most impactful player on the board and I do think that could be jeanty if he were available. If they followed that up with ersery/savaiinaea, jtt/burch/swinson, west/caldwell/norman-lott or some similar combination of players, I'd be ecstatic.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,405
Liked Posts:
54,980
Yeah, in the homestretch after everything has been said 100 times these guys have to come up with something new. Earlier someone suggested a writer should be fired for his crazy take but in fact that’s exactly what they’re being paid for.

While it is true, that fans will continue to regurgitate the same things over and over on a fan for him as we are doing here and I’m sure others are doing elsewhere, writers have to just throw shit at the wall as you said just to get somebody to read it.

The draft can’t come soon enough.


Guys…… what if we traded all our picks this year for picks next year when the draft is (per sources) LOADED? Then we tank this year and have a Super Draft next year? Caleb can take the year off and work on his footwork with big BJ. Bagent can start and when we lose him to free agency we get a comp pick!!

I’ll hang up and listen….
 
  • Haha
Reactions: chi

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,405
Liked Posts:
54,980
I've been project 2 for a while but this draft has so many that UDFA is a viable option for #2. We also still have Wheeler that showed genuine potential before the ding last year.

Was thinking one of those 7ths may actually be useful for once
 

Top