- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 15,938
- Liked Posts:
- 18,937
- Location:
- United Club
Dude, his actual name is Luther Burden the 3rd lol. It isn’t because of his number, though I’m sure that’s why he selected 3 as his number in college.He’s now LB87. Number 3 was Bronco Nagurski and is retired.
I also didn't think they would go T at 10 unless the board fell very differently and a trade down wasn't out of the question if Carter, Graham Loveland and Jeanty were gone. Maybe take Warren but Loveland is a much better fit... or Nolen. Being assured one of Hampton or Henderson plus more picks may have not been a bad option at that point.It was pretty apparent to me that Ben wanted a very highly rated offensive playmaker from the get-go.
They tried to move up to get Jeanty and when that fell through it was Warren/ Loveland at 10.
If Poles wanted Banks, he could have easily leap frogged the Saints. It appears competition for Braxton was always meant for a day 2 selection.
Burden was also an easy call after Henderson was taken and after that it was throw a dart against the board and see where it lands.
At least at this point, I like where most of the darts landed.
Henderson vs Burden is interesting. You could argue burden has the higher ceiling. I think Henderson on this team makes the bigger impact year 1. I’m more than fine with LB3, though. Still plenty of time to add a RB and I’m sure they will be drafting or signing one next off season.
I also didn't think they would go T at 10 unless the board fell very differently and a trade down wasn't out of the question if Carter, Graham Loveland and Jeanty were gone. Maybe take Warren but Loveland is a much better fit... or Nolen. Being assured one of Hampton or Henderson plus more picks may have not been a bad option at that point.
Completely agree. That they weren't trading up for a T would indicate that maybe they take Loveland even if Banks falls. This board would have gone nuclear.The board went chalk 1-7 until Tet and the 'late charging' Banks (at least to the media) went 8 and 9.
The Bears didn't consider trading down when they were at 10 so they obviously loved Colston there.
I'm pretty sure they also thought that they could have landed a Judkins/Henderson at 39 as well but that wasn't meant to be.
Dude, his actual name is Luther Burden the 3rd lol. It isn’t because of his number, though I’m sure that’s why he selected 3 as his number in college.
The board went chalk 1-7 until Tet and the 'late charging' Banks (at least to the media) went 8 and 9.
The Bears didn't consider trading down when they were at 10 so they obviously loved Colston there.
I'm pretty sure they also thought that they could have landed a Judkins/Henderson at 39 as well but that wasn't meant to be.
It would have made more sense to have named him LB III instead of LB3, because his name is not Luther burden 3.That’s awesome. I’m slipping this morning.
I personally think Banks being taken at 9 was a curve ball they didn't expect so therefore there was no need to trade up. It seems like more analysts had Banks moving down in the draft. I sure expected him to be there at 10. Totally agree with Judkins/Henderson in the 2nd too. I thought for sure the Bears would get one of them. If Ozzy can be a player and win LT, this will all play out well there but I still would prefer Henderson over WR3.
Shawn said Sportmockery does great work and we should all check them out sooooooooo................Shawm = DB70????Which one of you guys is Shawn? More Ozzy talk…
Anything i need to hear cause it's hard for me to listen to this guy talk??“Kyle looks like an answer.”
Nice recap of the day… Kyle talk starts at 12:28.