DefNextYear
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 21, 2024
- Posts:
- 4,024
- Liked Posts:
- 3,948
Looking at this lad now. Definitely fast but doesnt look as talented a natural runner as jeanty as you acknowledge. Question is how much betternis jeanty? That's the projection poles/johnson need to get right. Personally not as concerned about missing out on a second round pick if Jeanty is good enough to give the qb some room to develop.We know Henderson can block with the best of them and we know he's a homerun threat wherever he is on the field. He's not the rushing talent that Jeanty is but for that 2nd round pick, or a minor trade-up to ensure you get him? Much, much, much better value than even taking Jeanty at #10 let alone basically trading what could be Henderson + #10 for Jeanty. If Johnson is the offensive guru he's claimed to be then he could do wonders with Henderson and Swift who are both threats to house it if they get the ball in space. We shouldn't need to have to spend a top 10 pick on a running back with a coach like that.
This is the more interesting move for me. The Bears are a perfect spot for Hunter as he can split time at outside CB and be the primary 3rd WR so we can manage his overall snaps. If you buy into the idea he covers 2 positions with one player then is their a deal to be made with Cleveland to move up to 2 to get him?
What about anything below would make you say that calling him a "not good blocker" is incorrect?Wut? That's simply not true. Definitely needs refinement, wouldn't say he's as polished as a guy like Henderson. But he's more then capable.
This is a weird reply. You literally said this:That doesn't matter at this time.
If that's who Poles takes at 10 all I can do is wait and see if he's a good blocker. Then in a year or two I could look back and decide if it was a good pick.
If he trades up without a steal of a deal that makes it being a good pick much more difficult since he takes up 2 spots that could've been oline or dline.
Well, we can add a RB not named Jeanty. It's hyped as one of the deepest RB classes ever. That also factors into why I think trading up is bad when there's going to be a lot of value at RB later in the draft.Can't disagree with your points but I was a little underwhelmed by swift and johnson last year. Would be nice to have a rb who could create yards and take some pressure off the young QB.
I sure as **** hope so. Though all the people saying Graham is going to tumble well into the teens is surprising to me. Less than 3 hours til the start of finding out.Plot twist:
Poles is attempting to trade up. Not for Jeanty, as that is just a smokescreen, but for Mason Graham.
That's just from the top of my head. There has been plenty of others.This is a very dramatic take. The only one of those moves that really “set the bears back” was Claypool. Davis was a dud but hardly set them back…Bates cost a 5th and is currently their backup C who could also play OG, assuming he’s healthy.
If it's between trading up for Jeanty or trading down for Hampton, I'm taking Hampton + more value 100 times out of 100.Well, we can add a RB not named Jeanty. It's hyped as one of the deepest RB classes ever. That also factors into why I think trading up is bad when there's going to be a lot of value at RB later in the draft.
Did they meet with graham?Plot twist:
Poles is attempting to trade up. Not for Jeanty, as that is just a smokescreen, but for Mason Graham.
I heard they may be able to get myles Garrett for himIt’s time for Poles to get a future 1st and then some for Bagent
Hopefully not only Myles. I probably decline that.I heard they may be able to get myles Garrett for him
Hooker for Maxx Crosby too.I heard they may be able to get myles Garrett for him
A lot of teams would kill for Hooker.Hooker for Maxx Crosby too.