- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 20,532
- Liked Posts:
- 14,426
- Location:
- The sewers
My favorite teams
Ever heard of best case scenario?! And 50 wins isn’t happeningCubs will not be .500 they'll be lucky to win 50 games.
they will win 70+ games
Ever heard of best case scenario?! And 50 wins isn’t happeningCubs will not be .500 they'll be lucky to win 50 games.
I will happily take the bet on over or under 50 wins. They are going to be bad, but I will take the Over.Yet true... I guarantee I'll be more correct than you if the offseason continues on its current trajectory.
Not as long as you think.....it surprised me too. Baltimore and Detroit won 47 games back to back just a few years ago. But as bad as they might become, the Cubs will still win 65-70 games. Even the 2018 White Sox who were in rebuild overdrive, won 62 games. It's almost harder to be that bad than to be good.I am not stupid enough to call the Ricketts cheap, when they were top 5 in salary from 2016 through last year. Ans went into luxury tax more times than 25 other teams.
And I am not stupid enough to make a call that the team will win 50 games, when a team hasn't done that in a long time.
Stroman and Cubs about to be a thing?
![]()
REPORT: Cubs in "Hot and Heavy Discussion" Right Now with Marcus Stroman (UPDATE) - Bleacher Nation
This would be a major signing for the Cubs, not only for 2022 but for the years ahead.www.bleachernation.com
I mean this is a fair point. Other teams may give them a better shot to win sure. But you know as well as I do that it isn't always that simple. Both sides have to have interest. And if this is the question, why on earth would Jon Lester sign with a .500 team prior to 2015? Now I'll be honest, I tend to agree that it's less likely that Kershaw will sign with the cubs but that doesn't mean they can't try.Why on earth would Kershaw or Greinke sign with a cubs team that won’t be competing for a ring this season? They are both at the end of their careers, they don’t wanna play for a .500 team.
other than they would have zero interest in signing here, I could give more reasons…but there’s really no point
stroman details
AAV is higher than I would like but tbh for a 3 year deal i have 0 issues with it because cubs don't have any where else to spend in those 3 years with young players coming up
Stroman is more of a contact guy. Going forward with young pitching they will need a econ guy to give the pen a break after the pitch counts jump and the pen is in the 6th inning. It is going to happen. Having some econ arms in there with some young stuff guys like Kilian and Marquez. Ya it will save the pen.Well seems it's stroman for now. I don't hate the move though i'm interested to see numbers
Gotta say I’m surprised Stroman was down for just a 3 year deal. Figured he’d want to lock in as much guaranteed money as he could with those opt outs in case he can improve his contract down the roadstroman details
AAV is higher than I would like but tbh for a 3 year deal i have 0 issues with it because cubs don't have any where else to spend in those 3 years with young players coming up
I believe the lock out is a formality. It is being used in other sports so it keeps the ball moving vs another 1994.What happens if teams just keep negotiating with players during the lockout?
So technically the cubs could keep going about there business and working with FAs? They'd just royally piss off other teamsI believe the lock out is a formality. It is being used in other sports so it keeps the ball moving vs another 1994.
So technically the cubs could keep going about there business and working with FAs? They'd just royally piss off other teams