I was never opposed to cutting Leno, but Plan A was faulty (rookie with a bad back), Plan B appears to be another Rookie from the 5th round, Plan C was to "find" someone on the current roster to fill in, Plan D was to get a Tackle that is as old as Tom Brady, and will likely not make it through the season.
At this point, keeping Leno appears to have been the best plan. Perhaps making him aware that he was going to be cut or replaced through competition would have motivated him to play better?
Leno was a 7th rounder that played his was into a second contract, and at the time, many of you and I thought it was good signing.
The failure here is that, every single plan A-D was critically faulty. It appears that Pace has simple taken too much risk, in the off season to try to address the LT position.