One Bloggers Opinion On A Blackhawks Possible Trade Target

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Chicago Blackhawks Trade Market: A Name To Consider | Committed Indians

The Buffalo Sabres are roughly $3.6M over the salary cap right now, and have actively been looking for trade partners to dump salary. They may find one in the Blackhawks.

Chicago, which has already added former Sabre defenseman Steve Montador, should inquire about the asking price for Gaustad; he would be a perfect fit and is consistent with all of the moves Hawks GM Stan Bowman has made this summer.

Gaustad, 29, is listed at 6’5 and 212 pounds and is a physical center. He finished last year ranked third in the NHL in faceoff win percentage (59.8) while piling up 128 hits and 101 penalty minutes in 81 games. He also blocked 44 shots to go with 12 goals and 19 assists.

He averaged 15:08 ice time per game last year, and his size was used primarily on the penalty kill; Gaustad average 2:01 per game short-handed, winning 60 percent of his faceoffs on the penalty kill.

That is the ideal resume for what the Blackhawks are looking for right now. Bowman has been clear that he doesn’t feel set at the center position, and adding a player like Gaustad would enable coach Joel Quenneville to keep Patrick Sharp at wing throughout the coming season; Gaustad would project as a checking line center, with Dave Bolland bumping up to the second line.

Gaustad, a seven-year veteran, would make fans (and coaches… and management…) much more comfortable as a third line center on Opening Night than Marcus Kruger, who might have enormous potential but has only played 12 games on this continent, much less the NHL.

The fact that he’s a big, physical center aligns with most of what Bowman did this summer; his game is similar to what the Blackhawks were looking for in adding Jamal Mayers.

But one more part of the Gaustad also aligns perfectly with what Bowman accomplished this summer: his contract expires next summer.

Gaustad has one more year on his deal with a $2.3M cap number. The Blackhawks currently have roughly $3M in available cap space.

While moving Gaustad wouldn’t clear up all of Buffalo’s cap issues, the Blackhawks could put together a deal that would work well for the Sabres as they continue looking to cut salary.

Brian Connelly, the only AHL All-Star in Rockford last season, could be an affordable player to fill the blue line for Buffalo but has seen his stock slide in an incredibly deep group of defense prospects with the Blackhawks. If trading or demoting Shaone Morrison or Jordan Leopold is the next step for Buffalo, a seasoned prospect with the puck-moving skills of Connelly might be a perfect addition to the Buffalo organization.


Again, this is just a blogger, but I thought id throw it out there
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
Nice article and the Sabres are definitely going to have to pull the trigger - I personally think Boyes might be the victim there.

First off, the Blackhawks have more space than $3 Mil. That $3mil from cap geek is with 14 forwards on the team and 8 dmen. If Kruger doesn't make the team that is .900M right off the bat.

I get the feeling that if we trade for a center it would be more of a 2nd line type player. Coach Q (even though he switches lines like no other) has said that he prefers Bolland on the third line. To me it seems like Toews, Sharp, Bolland are going to be our starting 3 centers for this year.

Kruger is more suited for the wing as he acclimates his time in the NHL, and I actually think the perfect place for him would be as a center in the AHL. Kruger has some great raw talent and is a hound on the back check but he still has to work at the art of being a center.
 

GrinderBall41

Sox/B'Hawks/Bears/Purdue
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
666
Liked Posts:
166
Location:
NW Indiana
I would definitely be down with Boyes/ Sharp/ Hossa if Boyes is capable of playing LW.

I agree I don't see Q adding a third line C. Even though Bolland is a very expensive third-liner, we are better off with the depth that we get by splitting him from the top 2 lines.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Kruger wont be a factor for a while if at all.
 

GrinderBall41

Sox/B'Hawks/Bears/Purdue
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
666
Liked Posts:
166
Location:
NW Indiana
I dunno it's hard to ignore the internal love affair with Kruger. I hope it's warranted.
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
I dunno it's hard to ignore the internal love affair with Kruger. I hope it's warranted.

He plays exceptional defense for a player his age. As I said before, is a hound on the back check and isn't afraid to go in the corners or play on the boards.

Kruger definitely needs to fill out though. He is listed at 5'11" and 171 lbs. At 5'11" he needs to add another 10 - 20 lbs to be more effective in the NHL.

He did have a nice World Championships for Sweden after the season. I was able to catch a couple of the games on TV and he Showed some confidence which I really liked.

A player I like to look at is Marcus Johansson who is a young swede with the Capitals. Johansson is a lot more physically mature than Kruger, and 2 inches taller. Johansson has found early success in this league because of it. I think we could see Kruger become a 30+ point player in this league in a year or two. If he wants to play center though he is going to have to improve his size and face off ability.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Sign me up for Gaustad/Boyes. But, who we give up is another story.
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
Gaustad sounds more like a 3rd line center or an expensive 4th liner which doesn't do anything for the 2nd line. I agree with Hawkwriter's take on the center alignment as it currently stands and assuming Bolland stays (there isn't any reason to think that he won't) - I don't know where Gaustad would fit in.

Well not at center anyways - I suppose you can play wing and take faceoffs- and that -well actually that might be ok.

That being said, who else do they got?
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
^^^ Honestly, the only other person that could work out is Boyes. Boyes is a right winger (used to play center) and makes $4mil this year. He is a UFA after this year. The Sabres would want a draft pick or prospect/s for Boyes because they can't really afford to add salary.

Just looked at their team and how it is made up, I do think that Boyes is the one that gets traded...but anything can happen.
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
The Hawks need a 2C, so why would they go after a bottom 6 center? Bolland fits on the third line. I'm fine with Sharp playing center for now because that line was good together during the playoffs and I think Brunette will be fine on the top line. This could all change knowing Q though.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Gaustad would solidify the center position.

Fossil Mayers isn't the answer.
 
Last edited:

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
I wish we could pry away Ennis from buffalo
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
Gaustad would solidify the center position.

Fossil Mayers isn't the answer.

Only problem is we can't afford a 4th line center that makes 2.3M next year. If you want Gaustad as your 3rd line center and Bolland as your second, I don't know who would be our 4th line center.

Mayers should be fine. He definitely isn't going to wow anyone but if he continues to provide some toughness and keeps his FO% around 55% (like he did last year) he will be fine for the 4th line. He also provides another option on the PK where he can help out.
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
The Hawks need a 2C, so why would they go after a bottom 6 center? Bolland fits on the third line. I'm fine with Sharp playing center for now because that line was good together during the playoffs and I think Brunette will be fine on the top line. This could all change knowing Q though.

Pretty much how I feel, nice summary.

We won a Stanley Cup with Sharp at center...so why not? Not only is depth huge during the regular season/playoffs, but center depth is beyond important in the playoffs. I don't see any teams that can match the depth of Toews - Sharp - Bolland at the current time. San Jose comes close, Pitts IF they break up Malkin/Crosby (I think they finally use Malkin/Crosby/Staal in their top 6 year), and that is about all.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
With about three weeks until training camps open and the start of the 2011-12 season only six weeks away, the Buffalo Sabres and Washington Capitals remain above the $64.3 million salary cap.

They have until the start of the regular season to get under the cap, so while there's still plenty of time for both teams, their situations raise the possibility they will make salary-dumping deals.

The Sabres, sitting nearly $3.6 million over the cap, have a significant amount to clear, while the Capitals are nearly $891,000 above the ceiling.

The Capitals, of course, face an easier task. Although left winger Alexander Semin and his $6.7 million salary is a popular target for trade gossip, it's believed the Capitals will instead shed the necessary dollars by placing injured defenseman Tom Poti ($2.875 million per season) on long-term injury reserve.

It was assumed the Sabres would demote right winger Ales Kotalik and defenseman Shaone Morrisonn, as their combined salaries ($5.075 million) would provide the necessary cap relief, but GM Darcy Regier recently told Mike Harrington of The Buffalo News he hoped it wouldn't come to that.

“Hopefully we're able to make some moves to address that prior to the start of the season", said Regier, who also told The National Post's Sean Fitz-Gerald he would look at the trade market as the season neared, noting things are currently quiet with many of his peers on vacation.

Harrington wondered which players Regier would move, pointing out forwards Brad Boyes ($4 million), Jochen Hecht ($3.525 million) and Paul Gaustad ($2.3 million) are in the final year of their contracts and would need to have good seasons to be re-signed by the club.

Moving Boyes, who can play center and right wing, would clear more than enough cap space. At 29 years old, he is valuable to teams seeking scoring depth.

Hecht is only a season removed from a 21-goal, 42-point performance, but he's also aging (34) and has an injury history. Clearing his salary alone wouldn't be quite enough to get the Sabres under the cap.

Gaustad, 29, had the third-best faceoff percentage (59.8) in the league last season, was second on the club in hits (128) and is popular with his teammates. He has trade value, but Regier might not be keen on parting with such an aggressive and useful forward. Like Hecht, moving Gaustad's salary alone wouldn't be enough to make the Sabres cap compliant.

It's possible Regier will try and trade one of Hecht or Gaustad, then demote Kotalik or Morrisonn. The GM may also try to peddle the latter two, but there likely won’t be much interest.

Harrington also listed the Colorado Avalanche, Phoenix Coyotes, New York Islanders and Winnipeg Jets as potential trade partners, due to their need to get over the $48.3 million salary cap floor. The latter two teams can likely achieve that goal by re-signing or promoting players from their farm team, while the Coyotes recently became cap compliant by re-signing winger Mikkel Boedker.

The Coyotes are believed to be in the market for a center, so Boyes or Gaustad would fit that desire. The Jets are also rumoured to be seeking more scoring depth, while the Ducks will be in the market for a right winger if Teemu Selanne retires. Both teams would have a certain degree of interest in Boyes if he’s made available.

Beyond Boyes, Hecht and Gaustad, Regier's trade options appear limited.

Of the players earning $4 million or more, Thomas Vanek, Jason Pominville and Derek Roy won't be dealt. Neither will Ville Leino, who just signed with the team this summer, or Drew Stafford, who was re-signed to a long-term extension July 3.

Defensemen Robyn Regehr and Christian Ehrhoff are recent additions who'll figure prominently in the Sabres’ playoff hopes this season and anyone who suggests goaltender Ryan Miller will possibly be shopped should have their head examined.

Defenseman Jordan Leopold is a trade possibility, though. Like Hecht and Gaustad, shedding his salary ($3 million) alone wouldn't be enough to get the team under the cap, plus Regier would prefer to retain him.

While a trade is of course possible, Regier won't risk weakening any part of his roster simply to get under the cap, especially since he can't afford to take back salary in return. Demoting players such as Kotalik and Morrisonn remain his best option.

Here's an article with Buffalo's Cap
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
^^^ Honestly, the only other person that could work out is Boyes. Boyes is a right winger (used to play center) and makes $4mil this year. He is a UFA after this year. The Sabres would want a draft pick or prospect/s for Boyes because they can't really afford to add salary.

Just looked at their team and how it is made up, I do think that Boyes is the one that gets traded...but anything can happen.

With the cap it ends up becoming a 'how you can get under it' deal which doesn't always work out the best in terms of overall team composition; mainly because the other NHL GM's are aware of the situation as well. If they are over the cap, then they are a bit stuck in terms of options.

___


Mayers is just a depth guy, however the thing is - and it is pretty much relevant, - if you want to get a center for the 2nd line at some point in the season (or hold open that option), then you can't just jump for the first thing that comes along. Gaustad is a better player than Mayers -no question about that.

I'm not sold on Brad Boyes, and if you could wind back the clock on Hecht about 4 or 5 years - I'd rather him than anyone.

I do actually agree that Gaustad might be a lot better than Mayers at center, but not sure I want to go there just yet - it might be too much money to direct his way for later ( not that I have looked at capgeek or anything). Plus if Emery is to make the team, there needs to be money available for a contract for him. Does that leave the team in a position to go after anyone for draft choices/prospects not on the NHL roster at this point?
 
Last edited:

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
Right now on the Buffalo Depth chart they have Boyes as the 4th line center. This is what the whole chart looks like. The numbers in () are the players cap hits.

Thomas Vanek(7.1)--Derek Roy(4.0)--Ville Leino(4.5)
Tyler Ennis(.875)--Jochen Hecht(3.525)--Jason Pominville(5.3)
Nathan Gerbe(1.433)--Paul Gaustad(2.3)--Drew Stafford(4.0)
Cody McCormick(1.2)--Brad Boyes(4.0)--Patrick Kaleta(.907)
Ales Kotalik(3.0)

Tyler Myers(1.3)--Robyn Regehr(4.020)
Christian Ehrhoff(4.0)--Andrej Sekera(2.750)
Jordan Leopold(3.0)Mike Weber(.950)
Shaone Morrison(2.075)

Miller(6.25)
Enroth(.675)

Buyout (.167)
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
With the cap it ends up becoming a 'how you can get under it' deal which doesn't always work out the best in terms of overall team composition; mainly because the other NHL GM's are aware of the situation as well. If they are over the cap, then they are a bit stuck in terms of options.

___


Mayers is just a depth guy, however the thing is - and it is pretty much relevant, - if you want to get a center for the 2nd line at some point in the season (or hold open that option), then you can't just jump for the first thing that comes along. Gaustad is a better player than Mayers -no question about that.

I'm not sold on Brad Boyes, and if you could wind back the clock on Hecht about 4 or 5 years - I'd rather him than anyone.

I do actually agree that Gaustad might be a lot better than Mayers at center, but not sure I want to go there just yet - it might be too much money to direct his way for later ( not that I have looked at capgeek or anything). Plus if Emery is to make the team, there needs to be money available for a contract for him. Does that leave the team in a position to go after anyone for draft choices/prospects not on the NHL roster at this point?

To answer the bold first. Salak is currently being counted against the cap at a hit of .613M a year. If we sign Emery, it is going to be around that number (that would be my guess) so I wouldn't worry at all about the salary cap concerning Emery. Obviously if Emery is signed he basically takes the place of Salak's cap hit and we are right where we started.

I'm actually a fan of Boyes. He is a right winger but I am sure that he could play left wing (most wingers can adjust if given time - and Boyes isn't one of those pull up forwards like Kane who needs to be on the offside), also he plays center. Boyes put up 55 points last year, but just 3 and 4 years ago he put up 65 and 72 points. Imagine what he could do with a line Boyes/Sharp/Hossa. The nice thing about Boyes is that he is a UFA after this year.

Like you said though, it might be a smart thing to wait and see if anything comes available. At the trade deadline if we have $3Mil available in cap space, we would be able to take on a player(s) that make almost $9Mil a year because it would be prorated.

Also to icehog, there is no way that Boyes is their 4th line center to start the year. I realize that is their depth chart but they had Boyes playing right wing last year and he will be in the top 9 for the Sabres. They really improved their depth over the last year though, wow.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
To answer the bold first. Salak is currently being counted against the cap at a hit of .613M a year. If we sign Emery, it is going to be around that number (that would be my guess) so I wouldn't worry at all about the salary cap concerning Emery. Obviously if Emery is signed he basically takes the place of Salak's cap hit and we are right where we started.

I'm actually a fan of Boyes. He is a right winger but I am sure that he could play left wing (most wingers can adjust if given time - and Boyes isn't one of those pull up forwards like Kane who needs to be on the offside), also he plays center. Boyes put up 55 points last year, but just 3 and 4 years ago he put up 65 and 72 points. Imagine what he could do with a line Boyes/Sharp/Hossa. The nice thing about Boyes is that he is a UFA after this year.

Like you said though, it might be a smart thing to wait and see if anything comes available. At the trade deadline if we have $3Mil available in cap space, we would be able to take on a player(s) that make almost $9Mil a year because it would be prorated.

Also to icehog, there is no way that Boyes is their 4th line center to start the year. I realize that is their depth chart but they had Boyes playing right wing last year and he will be in the top 9 for the Sabres. They really improved their depth over the last year though, wow.

They are stacked on the right side. I see them having someone make that switch to LW. Heres some face=off numbers for Boyes.

2010/2011: 42.5
2009/2010: 44.4
2008/2009: 49.2
2007/2008: 44.5
2006/2007: 48.2
 

Top