- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,895
- Liked Posts:
- 43,086
How do
You seem to want to argue
Huh? Im just calmly discussing the issue. Who's arguing?
How do
You seem to want to argue
Well I'm not going to argue what argue means but it's similar to disagreeing on a common point. Don't think calm or excited has much to do with it. In this case we are in agreement.Huh? Im just calmly discussing the issue. Who's arguing?
I’ll never forget that McNabb didn’t know games could end in a tie. Dumbass drunk!
That is why I said he may make it as a senior member. Since there are 2 (I think) senior members eligible every year, there will have been 80 senior members that have already gone in. Perhaps some of the QBs above will already be in the HOF as senior members, opening up the possibility of him making it.But Aikman is only in because he was a winner on the big stage. Aikman doesn't make it with his career numbers without those SB wins. Boomer Esiason, Kerry Collins, Carson Palmer and Jim Everett all have better numbers than Aikman, do any of these guys even get comp tickets to the HOF? His argument is very weak.
I guess. But he is asking the HOF to become little more than a 10+yr participation trophy, if you make him the standard.That is why I said he may make it as a senior member. Since there are 2 (I think) senior members eligible every year, there will have been 80 senior members that have already gone in. Perhaps some of the QBs above will already be in the HOF as senior members, opening up the possibility of him making it.
The HoF shouldn't be purely about men who statistically dominated for a career. Individual accomplishments and stories that are impressive in their own time deserve recognition. As the first QB to put up 30+ TDs and single digit interceptions, that's worth noting in some capacity when that is now considered the bar for a great season.I guess. But he is asking the HOF to become little more than a 10+yr participation trophy, if you make him the standard.
Player A:
34,068 yards
193 TDs
101 INTs
62 percent completion pct
Player B:
29,997 yards
207 TDs
134 INTs
57 percent completion pct
Player C:
37,276 yards
234 TDs
117 INTs
59 percent completion pct
Player D:
35,133 yards
227 TDs
160 INTs
62 percent completion pct
Player E:
46,233
275 TDs
267 INTs
57 percent completion pct
Are these Hall of Fame numbers? Which ones? Who’s who? Which one is McNabb?
Mcnabb wasnt a mobile QB and most QB's under Reid have "wins" but not the big oneHe may have a point. I've never been a fan but there's lesser QBs with worse numbers in the Hall. He was fairly durable for a mobile QB and had a lot of wins...a lot of playoff games... a lot of Conference Championship shots. ...very often close but never quite enough. Kinda like Jim Kelly...... who's in the HOF.
If I were to enter a debate on the subject, I could take either side and give an equally good argument either way.
He has some points when comparing him to Aikman. I believe that he will make it but as a senior member 40 years down the line. The longer he doesn't make it, the more people will compare him to current QBs, not the Aikmans of the world, and he will not look so impressive.
Those 37,276 yards and 234 touchdowns in 13 years won't look so impressive if Mahomes passes them in 7 years as a starter.