- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 39,599
- Liked Posts:
- 52,334
The first round was absolute lightning, but I can't say I'm not underwhelmed with how the rest of the draft played out.
Solid B for me.
Where’s the option for A+?
The first round was absolute lightning, but I can't say I'm not underwhelmed with how the rest of the draft played out.
Solid B for me.
Here's you defending the players - do I see a bit of a defense of Kindle Vildor?
The highlighted area is an absolute gem of yours!
View attachment 38307
I am legit curious. Why did you pick Jonah Ellis as the "should have" guy?
Were you high on him pre-draft? Is there something specific about Ellis you really liked?
Or are you just picking his name because he went immediately after a Bears pick, and therefore was available?
Why not use Gabriel Murphy as an example? He was rated higher on several boards (websites, not teams) Is it because Gabriel Murphy went undrafted?
Austin Booker was rated higher as well by some, including NFL.com, and the Bears got him 69 picks later.
Had the Bears drafted Ellis at 75 as you wish they had, what about OL?
How do you determine these "random" and "objective" picks after the draft?
Not trying to dog you out, but I am legit curious when it comes to those constantly criticizing the GM after the fact saying what they "should have done" as though they have the benefit of the hindsight you are using.
Why are these opinions formed after the draft?
I was expecting earlier picks that could help bolster OL/DL, not only during the draft but all offseason. Our skill group has improved by 100% but the trenches are pretty much the same as they were at the end of last season
That's still not holes everywhere you dickless worm.No crying about the o-line protection or d-line pressure from you this year...
OL is improved. New tackle. Two new IOL. And a couple new depth vets.
DL is worse and the thing that worries me most about this team.
He's analyzed exactly ZERO tape on Willilams too.He hasn't even analyzed any tape beyond Caleb, whereas I have seen EVERY SNAP at this point. Was up all night trying to figure out this Booker mess but I'm starting to come around to him as a looooong term project unless they get him on some HGH.
A journal? You realize there's a search feature on the website, right?So while others are watching football, you're keeping a journal of everyone who disgarees with you? You must have a big scrapbook.
Be sure and tag my posts from this weekend. But promise you'll bring them up no matter what, because we know you cherry pick the times someone else gets it wrong and you don't.
False, you have lost every strawman argument he has ever made.Name anything about football you want to discuss. We’ll see who knows what.
I’ve never lost an argument to you. You never have an opinion that doesn’t default to everyone sucks.
The search feature on this site is horrible, produces very poor results even when you know exactly what you're looking for, doesn't go back over a year or two plus very well, and doesn't produce screenshots.A journal? You realize there's a search feature on the website, right?
And I won't tag your posts because I scroll past most of them (not worth reading).
And as if my infamous Mitch Trubisky post (after his rookie year) isn't cherry picked...there's literally over a hundred where I trash him, and just a few showing support.
More like, where’s the option for dick just jizzing everywhere!Where’s the option for A+?
You've missed the plot and are looking at it binary. Wr1 Wr2 ect.B-
Caleb carries what should be a D. I like Odunze the player and prospect (he comps to a faster Allen Robinson without the preinjured knee), but WR3 at 9 was a completely unnecessary pick and a luxury, and just something we’d make fun of the lions for doing some 2 decades ago; holes everywhere on the roster? Take another WR.
He’ll be WR2 next year? Great! Who’s LDE1 this year? After Tez nobody on the DL can get home. I hope this kids a perennial 1000+ per year guy. He’s going to be called a bust when he finishes this year with 300-400 receiving yards.
The OL was a project player who’s got traits and measureables, but not really technique. Nice local story I suppose.
A punter at 122 was egregious, even if he is being called the Iowa Hawkeyes best offensive weapon. I’m not saying Trenton Gil was good or that they should keep him longterm, but punter at 122? That’s something a stupid football team with minimal picks does. Overreach.
The trade up for the edge I like. Booker feels like he should have gone a lot higher than 144 though. I wonder why.
If they can’t make it in the next 3 years a a solid competitive playoff team with the weapons they have now, plus the draft picks in 2025 and 2026, plus free agency, just sell the damn team.
2026, if we supposedly got have nothing to spend it on, which will not be the case, then spend it on good depth, where we are weak.At first I thought you were saying playoffs next year (I do have hopes) but there's the rookie years being all over the place to demand that.
But in 3 years. Hell yeah.
Considering what we need I would expect this to be a whole team after '25. 1st round DE, 2nd DT/OL or C.
What is left for '26? Do we end up with a god RB because we have nothing else to spend it on?
Poles has the Bears legit set up to be a great team.