Packers sign Kyle Fuller to offer sheet

[Omeletpants]

Yeah I agree, and that's probably what the Bears are thinking. I could see Pace say "we're not letting the Pack get him."

Any GM that acquires a player to not let an opponent get him is an idiot. You acquire players to help your own team

 

[Bear Pride]

Any GM that acquires a player to not let an opponent get him is an idiot. You acquire players to help your own team

Not buying it.

 

[Omeletpants]

ESPN rates Fuller deal a D+............and they hate Pace
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...trades-signings-moves-offseason-bill-barnwell

 

[gwharris2254]

Is ESPN the CNN of sports ?
....radically biased ....

 

[playthrough2001]

ESPN rates Fuller deal a D+............and they hate Pace
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...trades-signings-moves-offseason-bill-barnwell

Barnwell was getting hammered on Twitter by Bear fans. He’s a thin skinned fellow.

 

[Adipost]

Barnwell was getting hammered on Twitter by Bear fans. He’s a thin skinned fellow.

It doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

 

[playthrough2001]

It doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

It’s one contract. If Fuller is who you claim he is and he plays well for 3 years, who cares?

 

[Navy Orange Ninja]

Is ESPN the CNN of sports ?
....radically biased ....

Pretty much, both have an agenda and are biased.

 

[BearFanJohn]

The bright spot here people is the Bears actually kept one of their successful (making it even more rare, like pictures of big foot riding a unicorn rare) draft picks.

 

[Omeletpants]

Barnwell was getting hammered on Twitter by Bear fans. He’s a thin skinned fellow.

If he supported the Bears you would be cheering

 

[anotheridiot]

but if the offer from green bay was really 5/60, all we had to do was match it. Instead we sign him for 4/56. I think that is why this is graded as such a bad contract.

 

[didshereallysaythat]

It doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

Walter football gave the Bears a B+

http://walterfootball.com/freeagentsigninggrades.php#ixzz59xpYjmKq

 

[Bearly]

but if the offer from green bay was really 5/60, all we had to do was match it. Instead we sign him for 4/56. I think that is why this is graded as such a bad contract.

:gary:

 

[iueyedoc]

I have to aks, which one of you fools is dis?
[video=youtube_share;yByb8g3E9m4]https://youtu.be/yByb8g3E9m4[/video]

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

but if the offer from green bay was really 5/60, all we had to do was match it. Instead we sign him for 4/56. I think that is why this is graded as such a bad contract.

It wasn't.

 

[SugarWalls]

So we re-sign a ‘home grown’ talent to a multi year deal and people are still bitching? I’m shocked.

 

[Wild_x_Card]

So we re-sign a ‘home grown’ talent to a multi year deal and people are still bitching? I’m shocked.

I absolutely find it entertain when people get bent over player contracts.

....A grip, some need to find one.

 

[BaBaBlacksheep]

If he supported the Bears you would be cheering

If you supported the Bears you'd be cheering....

 

[xer0h0ur]

So we re-sign a ‘home grown’ talent to a multi year deal and people are still bitching? I’m shocked.

I absolutely find it entertain when people get bent over player contracts.

....A grip, some need to find one.

#Cunting

 

[Washington]

ESPN rates Fuller deal a D+............and they hate Pace
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...trades-signings-moves-offseason-bill-barnwell

He did bring up some interesting points.

I too am confused on why Pace did not wait the full 5 days. He easily could have told Fuller "We're matching but making the Packers wait."

I'm glad Fuller was re-signed. Perhaps the franchise tag would have been better but that's Monday morning QB'ing at this point.