- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,432
- Location:
- Chicago
I'd love to ask Q what he sees in TT that makes him trustworthy where Pirri was not.
In Bowman I trust.
This trade won't prevent the Hawks from repeating IMO. Pirri had his moments as a legit 2C, but I'm excited for what TT will bring to the US.
I'd love to ask Q what he sees in TT that makes him trustworthy where Pirri was not.
Not a bad trade for the Hawks. Getting two draft picks for a guy who hasn't proven anything at the NHL level is a pretty good return, IMO. It also appeared that Pirri was not going to get a chance of playing in the top 6 here in Chicago so it was best for both parties to move on. Pirri will of course get an opportunity down in Florida, but he will likely flame out because Florida is where careers go to die.
It might actually be one of those - couldn't possibly be any worse situations (which isn't to say I thought Pirri was that bad -but it is more along the lines of Pirri was not what they were looking for -and if TT isn't either, technically speaking you just moved a salary. I don't think it is that big of a deal really -in that basically the moved a not really proven commodity. I doubt you were going to get much for the guy -and if he asked for a trade -then move him. He ought to fit in with Florida -they got a lot of the Rockford team down there.
I read somewhere (maybe here for all I can remember) that they were trying to get TT over -who knows -but why not, it is really sort of one of those bonus situations. The Hawks are really only playing for playoff positioning. I don't know that it matters so much if they get home ice advantage overall within the conference. They didn't have it in 2010.
The other thing is that you guys are right -there is no real knowing what, if anything TT can do - I know that there was a lot of unfounded speculative talk about Krueger being an offensive force because he was back in Europe. He hasn't been able to do much of that in the NHL -which isn't to say that that he is not a legitimate NHL player- because the kid is an excellent defensive centre.
..and on the other... other hand - in (I think) 1988 the Blues were crapping themselves trying to get this kid the Hawks had on their roster disqualified from being eligible to play in the playoffs (or I sort of remember this) -something about junior eligibility or something like that ... that kid was Roenick. So who knows... it would be nice if it all works out.
)and then on the other other other hand- I know I read a lot of bull (and heard it over here) which basically was talking about Crosby being the successor to Gretzky - and he isn't really that at all. A nice player, but - well yeah not exactly that threatening -and certainly not nearly as dominating as 99 was. Actually - I would say that from what I saw at Soldier Field the other night - Crosby couldn't dream of carrying Savard's jock strap let alone having delusions of Gretzkydom (NHL marketing notwithstanding.).
I think that has a lot to do with most in the NHL media having short term memories. Crosby will never be the player Gretzky was- ever. Gretzky was as intimidating as any coked up Probert with the luxury of not having to drop his gloves to prove it. There will never be another Gretzky no matter how much the spin doctors try and make the next great juniors player out to be. Remember Angelo Esposito? Of course you don't. He was the next Gretzky before he started believing his own hype and was nothing but a used up, broken player by the time he actually reached the NHL and was nothing but a throw in when the Pens acquired Hossa. The best player in the NHL is Toews. There is no doubt in my mind considering the guy refuses to lose and will do everything he can not to. That, imo, is a great player, beyond scoring a shit ton of secondary assists. Give me the guy who is on the same level as the best offensive players in the game, but plays so expertly smart as to not allow the other team from scoring and being insanely responsible in his own end and every stat sheet pundit can keep the scoring leaders for their loser team. I like Cups. I like getting shit faced during the summer down town with a whole bunch of marks who toss me free beers that I can inhale in front of them and make some sort of bond with if but for a few seconds. Fuck a scoring title if you aint putting those points in perspective.Glad you brought that up as it's been somewhat of a contention of mine for awhile now. Never said too much about it as I don't see a lot of his games, only his highlights which is probably reason to declare "too small a sample size". But in the full games I've seen him play, while he is a very good player....what am I missing about him being God's gift to the NHL? He was barely noticeable Saturday night as Toews' excellent game was the real eye catcher. I don't remember ever seeing a
game where Gretzky didn't catch your eye....whether he scored or not.