- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
LOL, SF wins!!!!
Wildest5
Active member
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 187
- Liked Posts:
- 126
I saw that also the dude committed dpi and defensive holding in the same play
Uncle Zeek
New member
- Joined:
- Jul 26, 2011
- Posts:
- 2,369
- Liked Posts:
- 800
Teams don't get penalized for the officials review
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
Not the way it works, Golden Tate Vs Atlanta was ruled a TD, overturned, and because Detroit had no time outs, ten seconds were run off the clock. Game over. I didn't see a ten second run-off so I am assuming they charged Pitt a time out.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
Sorry, but your wrong.
Sparks500
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 28, 2014
- Posts:
- 2,478
- Liked Posts:
- 2,178
They didn't have any time outs
Guess Who
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,756
- Liked Posts:
- 424
And Mitchell only had two.
Guess Who
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,756
- Liked Posts:
- 424
Miller's catch was a TD.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
I am aware of that, go back and read the posts.......
Guess Who
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,756
- Liked Posts:
- 424
So run, run, run, run,run,run pass?
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
So I ask the same question again.........
did Pittsburgh even have a time out? If not why not a ten second runoff?
did Pittsburgh even have a time out? If not why not a ten second runoff?
Uncle Zeek
New member
- Joined:
- Jul 26, 2011
- Posts:
- 2,369
- Liked Posts:
- 800
Let me rephrase that. They don't get penalized a time out for a play they didn't challenge.
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Visionman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 28, 2017
- Posts:
- 7,995
- Liked Posts:
- 4,451
because, as others have been trying to tell you, scoring plays are automatically reviewed upstairs.
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
That's because the result of the pass was incomplete so the clock stops. With golden tate it was complete but he didnt cross the plane. Hence the runoff. If it was rule incomplete after the review, there would be no runoff.
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
It was incomplete.
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
Exactly. Lot of bull shit call coming from NY.
Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,971
- Liked Posts:
- 1,634
They should just get rid of the automatic review for TD. It should come from the booth like it did in previous years.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
Ahh ok, that makes sense......kinda? Still fucked up. So, if they would have reviewed that to be a complete catch but he didn't cross the plane, then Pitt would have had a ten second run-off. Makes perfect sense........not!
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 17,758
- Liked Posts:
- 3,592
- Joined:
- Sep 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 41,611
- Liked Posts:
- 13,639
OK but makes no sense as time is stopped after TD anyway.
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up