Poles admits he has character issues, makes announcement on DE plans

[JordanSigler]

I think I'd try to find out what provoked/ prompted the GM to destroy property at NFL stadium(s)
It's always good to get too the root of the matter ...right?

What if they say they did it because they weren’t good at handling emotions?

 

[run and shoot]

I think I'd try to find out what provoked/ prompted the GM to destroy property at NFL stadium(s)
It's always good to get too the root of the matter ...right?

What if they say they did it because they weren’t good at handling emotions?

LOL....well the first thing is never assume. Sit down and have a discussion.
Again...I'd try to find out what provoked/ prompted the GM to destroy property at NFL stadium(s)

 

[JordanSigler]

LOL....well the first thing is never assume. Sit down and have a discussion.
Again...I'd try to find out what provoked/ prompted the GM to destroy property at NFL stadium(s)

Ah so you wouldn't believe what they told you straight up about why they did it?

What's the point of the discussion then if you don't believe them?

 

[MDB111™]

click link #51 And then quit talking to me. I here to discuss football. I'm done responding to your butt dribble

I literally clicked that link and it links me back to this same thread.! Why do you always speak in generalities and vagueness? Say what you mean and mean what you say bro!

You run this shit man! Take control!

 

[run and shoot]

What if they say they did it because they weren’t good at handling emotions?

LOL....well the first thing is never assume. Sit down and have a discussion.
Again...I'd try to find out what provoked/ prompted the GM to destroy property at NFL stadium(s)

Ah so you wouldn't believe what they told you straight up about why they did it?

What's the point of the discussion then if you don't believe them?

LOL you said I wouldn't believe him......not me. I'd want to find out what was going on
with the "GM" from a "emotional" perspective. I'd do some listening

 

[JordanSigler]

LOL you said I wouldn't believe him......not me. I'd want to find out what was going on
with the "GM" from a "emotional" perspective. I'd do some listening

yeah man, and what if that’s all they wanted to share? That they destroyed property during games because they had a hard time handling their emotions when bad things happened during the games. And then laughed after they told you that.

 

[run and shoot]

LOL you said I wouldn't believe him......not me. I'd want to find out what was going on
with the "GM" from a "emotional" perspective. I'd do some listening

yeah man, and what if that’s all they wanted to share? That they destroyed property during games because they had a hard time handling their emotions when bad things happened during the games. And then laughed after they told you that.

See what's going here is called "begging the question". No matter what I say you're gonna come back with another
"what if" ( fallacy question) ........couched in a extreme scenario. Which in the end creates your own personalized non sequitur. In addition, you're doing what's called......"Poisoning the well"

 

[ThatGuyRyan]

What if they say they did it because they weren’t good at handling emotions?

I’d be willing to be t is watching Sam Mustipher

 

[JordanSigler]

See what's going here is called "begging the question". No matter what I say you're gonna come back with another
"what if" ( fallacy question) ........couched in a extreme scenario. Which in the end creates your own personalized non sequitur. In addition, you're doing what's called......"Poisoning the well"

Extreme? I heard something similar on 670 yesterday?

 

[Discus fish salesman]

Wtf is going on in here? @run and shoot has shit running down the legs of his pants again? Holy **** man, pull it together

 

[run and shoot]

#70 lick it up for me

?

 

[run and shoot]

See what's going here is called "begging the question". No matter what I say you're gonna come back with another
"what if" ( fallacy question) ........couched in a extreme scenario. Which in the end creates your own personalized non sequitur. In addition, you're doing what's called......"Poisoning the well"

Extreme? I heard something similar on 670 yesterday?

oookay

 

[Discus fish salesman]

#70 lick it up for me

?

This is disgusting. Get your shit together, asshole! Your family must be disgusted to read what you put on here!

 

[JordanSigler]

oookay

?

 

[run and shoot]

You wanna see a a-hole look in the mirror at the guy here in link #70
You say my "family must be disgusted" SMH, You Initiate a statement #70 about"shit running down the legs"
on a sport forum. What would your mother say.

 

[JordanSigler]

You wanna see a a-hole look in the mirror at the guy here in link #70
You say my "family must be disgusted" SMH, You Initiate a statement #70 about"shit running down the legs"
on a sport forum. What would your mother say.

The poster in the link and the person in the mirror are two different guys...

 

[run and shoot]

See what's going here is called "begging the question". No matter what I say you're gonna come back with another
"what if" ( fallacy question) ........couched in a extreme scenario. Which in the end creates your own personalized non sequitur. In addition, you're doing what's called......"Poisoning the well"

Extreme? I heard something similar on 670 yesterday?

Not sure of the tie in..... to the observations above....but ok no problem

oookay

 

[KittiesKorner]

Calm down friends: mandatory mini camp is soon, not sure when, though

 

[JordanSigler]

Not sure of the tie in..... to the observations above....but ok no problem

I think your getting your links mixed up.

I asked a question and then you started playing a facetious game of well the GM would just offer me more information instead of just giving a judgement based off the info I provided.

I was hoping to have a discussion in good faith on an anonymous message board, my bad. ?‍

I know you were busy with “butt dribble” responses at the time that your mom would be proud of.

 

[run and shoot]

I think your getting your links mixed up.

I asked a question and then you started playing a facetious game of well the GM would just offer me more information instead of just giving a judgement based off the info I provided.

Here's what u did below.

run and shoot said:
See what's going here is called "begging the question". No matter what I say you're gonna come back with another
"what if" ( fallacy question) ........couched in a extreme scenario. Which in the end creates your own personalized non sequitur. In addition, you're doing what's called......"Poisoning the well"