norton63
Member
- Joined:
- Nov 13, 2016
- Posts:
- 213
- Liked Posts:
- 59
10-7Not even close. 4-13
10-7Not even close. 4-13
They play the Giants, Jets, Texans, Falcons, Washington, Eagles and the Lions twice. I could see at least 6 wins.I'm trying to see something
Hicks was hurt half the season, Goldman and Robinson just collected a check, Daniels gave way to a many sacks and Peterson is who again? Serious question, I can't think for the life of me who you are talking about.No Hicks, no Goldman, no Robinson (who at least drew coverage), no Daniels, no Peterson................
should I go on?
PetersHicks was hurt half the season, Goldman and Robinson just collected a check, Daniels gave way to a many sacks and Peterson is who again? Serious question, I can't think for the life of me who you are talking about.
If anything, the team got better with Goldman and Robinson off it. At least their replacements will likely give SOME effort.
Byrd went to the Falcons, I think.Hicks has been a shell of himself the last 2 seasons, and that's when he's been healthy. Still a solid player but note how he hasn't been signed yet. Same for Goldman.
Daniels is fine. Not a great player. Patrick more or less replaces him.
Robinson was invisible last year. Not that Pringle is a better player but it'll be pretty easy for him to eclipse Robinson's 2021 performance this coming season if he's starting.
Other losses include Tashaun Gipson, Jason Peters, Damiere Byrd, Marquise Goodwin and others, all of which I believe are still unsigned.
Other than Mack (who was hurt for more than half the season), the bears haven't lost a piece that can't be fairly easily replaced. More of a concern is the lack of draft capital to keep up with other teams that are on a similar level roster wise. The jets, giants and lions all have 2 first round picks (for example), among others.
?So I’m curious for those that think our record will be worse: knowing our schedule on paper seems to be a lot easier this year, and knowing most all the players we “lost” didn’t contribute much, if anything, last year, what to you base your thoughts on? Do you think Nagy was a ton better coach than our new staff will be?
Other than just pure clueless emotion, what are you basing your thoughts on?
IdiotBetter coaching, easier schedule. And the team isn’t devoid of talent, despite what clueless overreacting posters think.
Better coaching, easier schedule. And the team isn’t devoid of talent, despite what clueless overreacting posters think.
Schedule is way too easy. It would take an all time worse team to lose more than 10. I think the expectation should be 8-9 wins and anything short would be a failure to make a. Serviceable roster. Wildcard spot shouldn't be out the question
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaYes they will
What did I say that was wrong? It took an all time worse team to lose 10+ games with the schedule we had. And yes, Management failed to make a serviceable roster. Our OC refuses to throw the ball because our OL cant protect, Alot of free agents were busts and then we then traded away our two defensive captains.hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Schedule is waaayyyyy too easy broWhat did I say that was wrong? It took an all time worse team to lose 10+ games with the schedule we had. And yes, Management failed to make a serviceable roster. Our OC refuses to throw the ball because our OL cant protect, Alot of free agents were busts and then we then traded away our two defensive captains.
CorrectSo the logic is if we don’t have a complete team ready to compete for a SB we are destined for 3-4 wins? There’s nothing in between? Lol
The irony of this post is just delicious…Other than just pure clueless emotion, what are you basing your thoughts on?