Proof that Bears fans are absolutely clueless when it comes to evaluating OL play.

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

Stop fu cking arguing with the idiotic fake lions fan troll

Goddamn already

Easiest way for that to happen is banning him from the forum. Why he he still around? Beats me

 

[TL1961]

So being shy 244 and 266 yards isn’t close to 1000? Gotchaaaaaaaaa.

A moron is a “lions” fan posting on a Bears message board. Can you explain that one?

Are you trying to claim 734 yards is close to 1,000?

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

Are you trying to claim 734 yards is close to 1,000?

Sure am!

 

[nc0gnet0]

I had intercourse with your mom. Why does your room smell like chum?

Might I recommend a good therapist for your necrophilism disorder, you sick ****?
Never knew a rotting corpse smelled like chum, but hey, I guess you do.

 

[SugarWalls]

Might I recommend a good therapist for your necrophilism disorder, you sick ****?
Never knew a rotting corpse smelled like chum, but hey, I guess you do.

Did you start with the fish sex before or after your mom passed?

 

[Payton!34]

Am I on a payment plan? Do I have 17 months to pay it off? Is there interest?

Stfu with your stupid analogy.

You gotta hate those analogies when they disprove your point! Less than 15 yards per game is pretty fucking close. I guess it’s up to the definition of close which isn’t defined.

I’d say that’s close, but it’s arguable for sure. Your response tells me that you agree with “STFU” ending.

Being wrong isn’t always bad, it’s about your reaction amd perception- don’t look at it as a negative thing, being wrong teaches us lessons. Whether you choose to learn from it or not is up to you.

People get so upset over the silliest of arguments and then set out to prove their points. What’s close or not in terms of receiving yards- you will never receive a consensus on the subject- it’s not important!

I will guarantee at least 2 1000 yard receivers this year and probably 3 if you’re counting te’s, but does that even matter? I’d say it increases our chances of winning but aren’t solely correlated.

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

You gotta hate those analogies when they disprove your point! Less than 15 yards per game is pretty fucking close. I guess it’s up to the definition of close which isn’t defined.

I’d say that’s close, but it’s arguable for sure. Your response tells me that you agree with “STFU” ending.

Being wrong isn’t always bad, it’s about your reaction amd perception- don’t look at it as a negative thing, being wrong teaches us lessons. Whether you choose to learn from it or not is up to you.

People get so upset over the silliest of arguments and then set out to prove their points. What’s close or not in terms of receiving yards- you will never receive a consensus on the subject- it’s not important!

I will guarantee at least 2 1000 yard receivers this year and probably 3 if you’re counting te’s, but does that even matter? I’d say it increases our chances of winning but aren’t solely correlated.

In my opinion it’s close and don’t really care what others say, especially “lions” fans. It got to the point where I was just purposely trying to get Bluegill riled up and it clearly worked.

 

[TezMaKai]

Might I recommend a good therapist for your necrophilism disorder, you sick ****?
Never knew a rotting corpse smelled like chum, but hey, I guess you do.

RIP

At least she doesn't have to be ashamed of you anymore

 

[PrideisBears]

WTF is this? Are we going to start using unrealized wins as a stat too?


(Sorry, not trying to be a dick but the name of this stat cracks me up)

Akin to almost interceptions

 

[TL1961]

He was 250 short. Over a 17 game span that’s nothing if the Bears had a competent offense. So my point still stands as well

This is a perfect example of not knowing when you’re beat.

Rome wasn’t “close to 1,000” because of “should haves” and “could haves”.

I am very high on Rome and look forward to him having a good career with the bears, but I’m not going to ridiculously convince myself that he had 33% more yards than he really had.

He was not close to 1,000 and that is ok. He’s going to be very good.

 

[TL1961]

Akin to almost interceptions

Do you realize how many almost wins could have been wins if the almost interceptions had been interceptions?

 

[PrideisBears]

Do you realize how many almost wins could have been wins if the almost interceptions had been interceptions?

I prefer the almost int’s so we can keep both streaks alive

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

This is a perfect example of not knowing when you’re beat.

Rome wasn’t “close to 1,000” because of “should haves” and “could haves”.

I am very high on Rome and look forward to him having a good career with the bears, but I’m not going to ridiculously convince myself that he had 33% more yards than he really had.

He was not close to 1,000 and that is ok. He’s going to be very good.

Your first sentence is complete nonsense and honestly just flat out stupid. We all have different opinions.

I’m not basing my opinion on should have and could haves. I’m basing it on amount of receptions compared to targets. And in my eyes, having 54 receptions for 734 yards with 101 targets is close to 1000 yards.

And if you want to include the should have and could haves, we all know Odunze would have been over 1000 yards.

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

RIP

At least she doesn't have to be ashamed of you anymore

She’s laughing in her fish tank deep down in the Indian Ocean.