Prospect News and Rumors

[PolarBear]

You can pretty much forget about Ramsey, Bosa, Jack and Tunsil. Very slim chance at Buckner and Stanley. Hargreaves and Zeke are your two top guys who could fall.

Best, realistic players in play at #11 -

- Jack Conklin
- A'Shawn Robinson
- Shaq Lawson

 

[WindyCity]

You can pretty much forget about Ramsey, Bosa, Jack and Tunsil. Very slim chance at Buckner and Stanley. Hargreaves and Zeke are your two top guys who could fall.

Best, realistic players in play at #11 -

- Jack Conklin
- A'Shawn Robinson
- Shaq Lawson

My guess is that those will be the 3 they are staring at

1. If you want a LT you need to pick him in the 1st
2. So much upside and scheme fit
3. If you want a pass rusher draft them in the 1st

 

[Omeletpants]

I don't want to kill the Myles Jack boners in here, but he wil be gone by 5 at the latest, wouldn't shock me is he went 2.

 

[FireFox]

Aren't you a little old for this show?

 

[GSH_34]

I don't want to kill the Myles Jack boners in here, but he wil be gone by 5 at the latest, wouldn't shock me is he went 2.

Oh I know he won't be there and it's a pipe dream.

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

 

[BearsFan51]

I don't want to kill the Myles Jack boners in here, but he wil be gone by 5 at the latest, wouldn't shock me is he went 2.

The likelihood Myles Jack has a better career than Lance Briggs, discuss.

 

[Komodo Dragon]

The likelihood Myles Jack has a better career than Lance Briggs, discuss.

Put down the pipe and step back

 

[PolarBear]

The likelihood Myles Jack has a better career than Lance Briggs, discuss.

Myles Jack has Patrick Willis and Ray Lewis type athleticism. He has the production and tape to match. That's his upside.

 

[WindyCity]

I still think my #1 option would be a short move up to the 6-8 range and grabbing Buckner.

The Bears need some game changing talents and he is such a perfect scheme fit.

 

[PolarBear]

I still think my #1 option would be a short move up to the 6-8 range and grabbing Buckner.

The Bears need some game changing talents and he is such a perfect scheme fit.

Buckner might be another candidate to fall...Really depends on how many QB's go and if Treadwell goes top 10. He isn't a scheme fit for NYG or TB so if he makes it past Philly, I think he will be there for Chicago.

One way Buckner falls -

1. Tennessee Titans - Laremy Tunsil
2. Cleveland Browns - Carson Wentz
3. San Diego Chargers - Jalen Ramsey
4. Dallas Cowboys - Joey Bosa
5. Jacksonville Jaguars - Myles Jack
6. Baltimore Ravens - Ronnie Stanley
7. San Francisco 49ers - Jared Goff
8. Philadelphia Eagles - Laquon Treadwell
9. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Vernon Hargreaves
10. New York Giants - Ezekiel Elliot

 

[Enasic]

I still think my #1 option would be a short move up to the 6-8 range and grabbing Buckner.

The Bears need some game changing talents and he is such a perfect scheme fit.

I love Buckner but if I'm trading up it's for the likes of Ramsey or Jack.

 

[pseudonym]

Trading to 1-3 is VERY expensive from 11. Like multiple firsts. I wouldn't do it. BUT trading from 11 to 5 isn't bad.

#11 = 1250
#5 = 1700

Trade our 1st (1250) and 2nd (490) gets you there (1740). Maybe even a 5th and 7th back (JAX 5th is worth 32, 7th is 3 pts).

 

[GrinAndBearIt]

I'm all for trading up if possible,I'd hate to give a 1st and second, but for Buckner, Jack, Ramsey , I would be willing to trade up, unless we can get an Ezekiel, and K Joseph with our first and second picks, you just never know how draft will play out.

 

[pseudonym]

I'm all for trading up if possible,I'd hate to give a 1st and second, but for Buckner, Jack, Ramsey , I would be willing to trade up, unless we can get an Ezekiel, and K Joseph with our first and second picks, you just never know how draft will play out.

True. I feel like there will be some studs at #11, like the #1 or #2 guy at a position. Depends on if you want to go OL, DE, CB, QB, RB or S.

 

[PolarBear]

I like Buckner but not enough to give up a 2nd to get him though.

 

[Sagbear]

I just hope there is a run on QBs and someone reaches for lynch in the top 10 (unlikely but not impossible). Hargreaves, Stanley are the most likely of the top to drop to us.

 

[Komodo Dragon]

I'd rather stay at 11 and think one of Stanley, Buckner or Hargreaves. If they are gone with the other top guys take Robinson or trade back about ten spots and pick up another second. There are many good players between 18-45

 

[GSH_34]

Myles Jack has Patrick Willis and Ray Lewis type athleticism. He has the production and tape to match. That's his upside.

Good comparisons from an athleticism standpoint. Forgot how ridiculous Ray's measurables were. He ran 4.39 at his Miami Pro Day. [emoji15]

Jack's coverage ability is why I'm so intrigued with his upside. It's possible he could line up as a Nickel corner in sub packages.

His defensive coordinator has to be drooling over the versatility and flexibility Jack would give him.



Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

 

[GSH_34]

Put down the pipe and step back

Not sure you realize how good a prospect Jack is and how much potential he has.

If Jack has a Briggs-esque career I'll be very disappointed because that means he underachieved. Not a knock on Briggs at all either. Just a testament to Jack's ceiling.

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

 

[fatbeard]

Not sure you realize how good a prospect Jack is and how much potential he has.

If Jack has a Briggs-esque career I'll be very disappointed because that means he underachieved. Not a knock on Briggs at all either. Just a testament to Jack's ceiling.

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

The question with Jack, at least from the Bears' perspective, is "Where does he play?" He's clearly not a OLB in a 3-4. I just watched all his tape for the second time last night, and I don't think he's a ILB in a 3-4, either. So he probably has to move to SS, at least in a base formation, but a 6'1" 245lbs SS who runs and covers like a DB would be a nice tool to have.