RisWell01
New member
- Joined:
- Oct 10, 2015
- Posts:
- 338
- Liked Posts:
- 49
GSH_34
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,650
- Liked Posts:
- 606
Kizer or Mahomes at 3 for me. I meh on Watson and hell no on Trubisky.
If it's defense, gotta be a DL/EDGE. Thomas, Allen, McDowell, Barnett, etc.
Absolutely no way I'd take a Safety that high. And a CB is a stretch too.
I think Pace goes QB. We need to get our guy and he's in a perfect position to do it. Next year's class is insanely talented but he can't afford to wait another year.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
If it's defense, gotta be a DL/EDGE. Thomas, Allen, McDowell, Barnett, etc.
Absolutely no way I'd take a Safety that high. And a CB is a stretch too.
I think Pace goes QB. We need to get our guy and he's in a perfect position to do it. Next year's class is insanely talented but he can't afford to wait another year.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
- Joined:
- Sep 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,460
- Liked Posts:
- 2,823
You'd take mahomes @3 , but not Adams??? OK...
- Joined:
- Sep 28, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,622
- Liked Posts:
- 10,259
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
That's unfortunate. On tape, he's a top 3 CB in this draft. He's the Malik Hooker of CB's with his ball skills.
[video=youtube_share;oKvkJhS9wEo]https://youtu.be/oKvkJhS9wEo[/video]
GSH_34
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,650
- Liked Posts:
- 606
Yup. Positional value. And Mahomes has a huge ceiling.
Safety is the least valuable defensive position. Ain't no way I'm picking one that high, especially in this deep of a DB class.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
GSH_34
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,650
- Liked Posts:
- 606
Bucky Brooks is so bad (in general). Never understood how or why professional evaluators change their rankings this late in the process.
And if a Pro Day/Combine causes you to do that, you're doing your job wrong.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
GSH_34
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,650
- Liked Posts:
- 606
There is no positional value taking a Safety at 3. In fact, the last DB to go top 3 was Shawn Springs back in like 1997.
I'd rather take a chance on a QB that high than draft arguably the least valuable position in the game apart from special teams.
I even struggle justifying a CB that high and as good as Lattimore is, I'd hard pass on him too that high.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
I'd rather take a chance on a QB that high than draft arguably the least valuable position in the game apart from special teams.
I even struggle justifying a CB that high and as good as Lattimore is, I'd hard pass on him too that high.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
Magenta Aye-Aye
Member
- Joined:
- Mar 28, 2017
- Posts:
- 197
- Liked Posts:
- 66
If that position of value can produce the next Brian Dawkins or Ed Reed, there is no reason not to take a leader of the defense at #3. That would give the Bears more value than Mahomes and by far. And yes Pace can wait until next season to draft a QB if needed, especially with that class. I think he will grab a QB this year, maybe not one of the top 3.
- Joined:
- Sep 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,460
- Liked Posts:
- 2,823
To each his own. Mahomes is not worthy of #3 overall.
Dagman310
Active member
- Joined:
- Aug 22, 2012
- Posts:
- 663
- Liked Posts:
- 289
Personally I'd be disappointed if they took Mahomes at 3 over any of those three. If all of those qbs are there at 3, we might actually have soneone that wants to trade for the pick. That would be ideal. Either way we are going to get a great player at 3 I just don't see it being Mahomes. Why is it a hell no on Trubisky?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
GSH_34
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,650
- Liked Posts:
- 606
Don't like Trubisky at all. By far my least favorite of the big 4. Inexperience, Fedora's system, lack of physical tools.
As for Mahomes, I'm of the belief that if you like a QB, you take him anywhere. My QB board is:
1) Kizer
2) Mahomes
3) Watson
4) Trubisky
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
mcbear34
Here for the Wins
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,837
- Liked Posts:
- 633
- Location:
- Houston
Matt Barrows ✔ @mattbarrows
Lots of talk/rumor about Carolina (picking at No. 8) trying to obtain #49ers' No. 2 pick. Told there's nothing currently in the works.
Lots of talk/rumor about Carolina (picking at No. 8) trying to obtain #49ers' No. 2 pick. Told there's nothing currently in the works.
ZenBear34
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 28, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 3,799
Weird. I don't see a prospect in this draft worth moving up for outside of Garrett...so unless they think the Browns are going QB at 1 I'm curious as to who they want.
dennehy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 29, 2015
- Posts:
- 11,072
- Liked Posts:
- 12,414
- Location:
- Jewels to get a case of Squirt
I think teams that feel they are close might put a lot of value in Fournette. Carolina is a talented team, and adding Fournette would make that offense much more formidable, especially with the amount of read option they can run.
Enasic
Who are the brain police?
- Joined:
- Mar 17, 2014
- Posts:
- 13,405
- Liked Posts:
- 9,827
Solomon Thomas?
mcbear34
Here for the Wins
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,837
- Liked Posts:
- 633
- Location:
- Houston
MrOuija
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,691
- Liked Posts:
- 1,123
But if they wanted Fournette, wouldn't they rather trade with the Bears? They'd need less compensation and they'd know that, A. We don't need a RB and B. Pace is probably willing to trade. Seems like if they want to trade to #2 then they're trying to scoop one of our targets.
- Joined:
- Sep 5, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,460
- Liked Posts:
- 2,823
I think Bears would be their ceiling, give up less than #2+pace has said open to trade down. I think they look at Thomas/Allen. In hindsight, they would want #2 if they feel bears going that route. If there is anything to "rumors"
mcbear34
Here for the Wins
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,837
- Liked Posts:
- 633
- Location:
- Houston
I agree, Gettleman is probably sniffing both buttholes
Les Grossman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 22, 2011
- Posts:
- 14,001
- Liked Posts:
- 12,836
Fournette, I would guess. He's a generational RB who would take the beating away from Cam.
